?action=recallrev=207
As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to scan
and review the archives for this month:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
On 6/15/2011 9:58 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
+1 (binding)
Past the 72 hour notation below but I didn't see a final tally.
Then you missed the note.
[Hint: search for the subject RESULT]
---BeginMessage---
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Binding votes
-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
I may have missed the vote it being over a weekend and me not checking
the archives for this month:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
This vote will close
to scan
and review the archives for this month:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
the archives for this month:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
This vote will close
;
b. + : because the many people from the OpenOffice.org project that I
know and want to give the Apache OpenOffice.org a chance, which I think
is fair too.
Round (b-a) = +0 (non binding)
Kind regards,
Cor
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:02:44 -0400
Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
-1 (non-binding)
I've agonised long and hard about this. Wouldn't it be fantastic
to see Apache take on such a great trophy project? And of course
we'll be best-of-friends with TDF despite perhaps a few vocal
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Binding votes are ones that are cast by Incubator PMC members. Quorum
is 3 binding +1 yes votes. Once quorum is met, if more +1 votes are
received than -1, the vote carries. Otherwise, the vote fails.
Vote started on
Congratulations to all who want this to happen! Now lets do our best
to make it a success.
For all the new committers: Welcome to the ASF. I wish a good time
here with lots of fun.
Cheers,
Christian
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Binding votes are ones that are cast by Incubator PMC members. Quorum
is 3 binding +1 yes votes. Once quorum is met, if more +1 votes are
Hey hey,
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
+1 binding. Given the sheer number of committers involved in this podling
there will be some work to do trying to gel a coherent development community
out of the group. While I am optimistic, I am reminded
On 6/13/2011 11:26 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Binding votes are ones that are cast by Incubator PMC members. Quorum
is 3 binding +1 yes votes.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Phillip Rhodes
motley.crue@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Binding votes are ones that are cast by Incubator PMC members.
On 6/13/2011 11:31 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Phillip Rhodes
Mondo rad. But one quick question what does the (v) mean, listed after
some of the names in the voter list?
I meant to either explain that or remove it. Oh well. :-)
That was my own personal
...@leosimons.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, June 13, 2011 12:31:00 PM
Subject: [DISCUSS] how to add many committers to a new project (was: Re:
[VOTE]
Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation)
Hey hey,
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
+1
A (v)olunteer on the committer roster
me too, if allowed
M.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com wrote:
A (v)olunteer on the committer roster
me too, if allowed
Oversight on my part. One that has no bearing on the process. Next
step for you is to send in an ICLA.
http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
M.
-
I see this is too late to count but I offer my thoughts anyway.
It was already late before it lurked in an outbox for a while.
[-1] (non-binding) Vote to reject the OpenOffice.org PROPOSAL
I reject the proposal not the community or the project.
I am still a bit of an open source newb and
Am 12.06.2011 01:20, schrieb Henri Yandell:
It is a large project; but so what? I thought Harmony had no chance of
being coded and that went very quickly, showing how well maximum
openness can walk the path between corporate, startup and hobby needs.
You think Apache Harmony is a comparable
Am 12.06.2011 01:20, schrieb Henri Yandell:
It is a large project; but so what? I thought Harmony had no chance of
being coded and that went very quickly, showing how well maximum
openness can walk the path between corporate, startup and hobby needs.
You think Apache Harmony is a comparable
+1
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
Comment: While I favor focusing on the reference implementation for ODF, as
my previous comments
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)
Dw*.
*: who is in a - what the hack mood - and thinks that get this code base in a
state where people can start hacking is better than let it bitrot any further.
And fully trust the incubator process to attic the code jettison
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
+/- 0 (non binding)
I am still going back and forth, on whether or not.
against:
I understand very well most of the arguments from André
https
+1 [binding]
Alex
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi,
On 10 June 2011 17:02, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache Incubator project.
+1 (non-binding)
Andrew.
--
asav...@apache.org /
+1 (not binding)
Trying to establish a layer of common infrastructure for Open Document
Format processors looks a worthy attempt, even with all the warnings and
caveats.
I was Incubator PMC member till recently, and I could have re-joined to
vote. It looks like cheating, though.
Regards
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache Incubator project.
+1 (non-binding)
/niklas
+1 non-bindung
From Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
Subject[VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Date Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:02:44 GMT
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1
On 2011/5/12 9:5 Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com wrote:
Nearly the whole and very active community in Brasil switched to LO. A
lot of very brilliant and active members of the german community are
working now at LO, doing a very good job.
In General, the Brazilian users keeps using
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache Incubator
On Jun 12, 2011, at 3:01 AM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 01:20, schrieb Henri Yandell:
It is a large project; but so what? I thought Harmony had no chance of
being coded and that went very quickly, showing how well maximum
openness can walk the path between corporate, startup and
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
(binding)
- Shane
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:12 PM, IngridvdM ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de wrote:
[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
I would like to humbly beg you people from Apache for giving a chance to
those who are willing to join
[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
I would like to see a future for OOo and i hope that this can be a new
start. A few words to myself because i wasn't really visible here on the
list so far. My name is Juergen Schmidt (jsc) and I have worked on the
project since 1997
:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
This vote will close 72 hours from now.
- Sam Ruby
= OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
== Abstract ==
!OpenOffice.org is comprised of six
OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
This vote will close 72 hours from now.
- Sam Ruby
= OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
== Abstract ==
!OpenOffice.org is comprised of six personal productivity
encourage people to
scan and review the archives for this month:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org
On 6/12/2011 4:03 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Not that much;
* Same players.
* Same importance.
Really?
I'm pretty certain there is 0.05% overlap between the Office Suite
and Java Runtime mechanics of either Sun or IBM. They probably never
even shared so much as a VP, although I could be
+1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)
-Bertrand, who agrees with Dirk.
On Sunday, June 12, 2011, Dirk-Willem van Gulik di...@webweaving.org wrote:
*: who is in a - what the hack mood - and thinks that get this code base in
a state where people can start hacking is better than
=207
As the proposal discussion threads are numerous, I encourage people to scan
and review the archives for this month:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent
)
Malte.
On 10.06.2011 19:05, Sam Ruby wrote:
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h
the archives for this month:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
This vote will close
Ketih,
I think Italo is incorrect saying voting no would be a defeat for
free software. It is an honest mistake. People don't know what else
could happen, because alternatives are not being discussed.
They have been discussed. Even at this list. We have discussed to say
no to OOo at the ASF.
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding).
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h
Hi,
I am wearing my OOo-hat here, and this is my vote:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[X ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
I have contributed to OpenOffice.org for several years and I doubt
that the project will find
-Original Message-
From: Volker Merschmann [mailto:merschm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 11 June 2011 6:49 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Hi,
I am wearing my OOo-hat here, and this is my vote:
[ ] +1 Accept
Hi Gavin,
Op 11-6-2011 10:59, Gavin McDonald schreef:
-Original Message-
From: Volker Merschmann [mailto:merschm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 11 June 2011 6:49 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Hi,
I am wearing my OOo-hat
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache Incubator project.
+1 from me (binding).
cheers,
Leo
Hi,
Am 11.06.2011 06:17, schrieb Keith Curtis:
I think LibreOffice people are quiet for various reasons:
Everyone here votes on his own behalf, for his own reasons and at the
time he feels to be the right time.
There is currently no need to vote on anybody's behalf (really - nobody
here
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Ketih,
I think Italo is incorrect saying voting no would be a defeat for
free software. It is an honest mistake. People don't know what else
could happen, because alternatives are not being discussed.
They have
incompatibilities with LibreOffice.
Cheers,
Andreas
---
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 11 Jun 2011, at 11:23, Simos Xenitellis simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
The part about the ASF undertaking only a reference implementation for
the ODF format
was not discussed.
Yes it was. In fact it was the suggestion that OO.o should
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Simos Xenitellis
simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
Now that you mention it; the voting started at time (7.02pm local time).
Benson Margulies voted at 7.03pm.
You voted at 7.05pm.
Is the voting start time pre-announced?
The voting time was pre-announced on
I think Italo is incorrect saying voting no would be a defeat for
free software. It is an honest mistake. People don't know what else
could happen, because alternatives are not being discussed.
They have been discussed. Even at this list. We have discussed to say
no to OOo at the ASF. We
On Jun 11, 2011, at 6:23 AM, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Christian Grobmeier
The part about the ASF undertaking only a reference implementation for
the ODF format
was not discussed. This would probably make the Free Software
Foundation (FSF) happy.
The
-1 (non-binding)
Within the discussion several reasons that might support a -1 vote were
named, many have been addressed or may be addresed by the podling.
I still feel obligated to vote -1 because (even if the podling advances
to a Apache TLP) this will be the end of OpenOffice.org as it is
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
-1.
I think by accepting this ASF is risking quite a lot of flak and
reputational
OpenOffice.org for
incubation
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Friday, June 10, 2011, 6:13 PM
El 10/06/11 14:17, Roman H. Gelbort
escribió:
+1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
and binding
+1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)
N
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
This vote will close 72 hours from now.
- Sam Ruby
= OpenOffice.org - An open productivity environment =
== Abstract ==
!OpenOffice.org is comprised
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 11 Jun 2011, at 11:23, Simos Xenitellis simos.li...@googlemail.com
wrote:
The part about the ASF undertaking only a reference implementation for
the ODF format
-1 (non-binding)
As stated elsewhere [1], this incubator, combined with the
disruption and delay it's causing to the OOo ecosystem, does not add
enough unique value to what we already have a TDF to justify the
effort.
(I'm referring to the existing proposal's mission statement [2], not
to the
+1 (non-binding)
--
Steve Lee
Full Measure - open source accessibility - http://fullmeasure.co.uk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hi Sam,
On Jun 10, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
(binding). Good luck!
Cheers,
Chris
+1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
(non-binding)
At first I thought beeing on the committers list would imply my approval
of the proposal. But now I'd like to give the reasons for my vote as so
many others did:
(All just my point of view as an suburban inhabitant of the old OOo
community
+1 (non-binding)
/-/-/-/-/-/
Scott Wilson
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (non-binding)
Malte.
On 10.06.2011 19:05, Sam Ruby wrote:
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 11 Jun 2011, at 11:23, Simos Xenitellis simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
The part about the ASF undertaking only a reference implementation for
the ODF format
was
+1 (non-binding)
Malte.
On 10.06.2011 19:05, Sam Ruby wrote:
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3cBANLkTi=xbf7sg1nc2jjrd-obxofukki...@mail.gmail.com%3e
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 11:55
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ... ]
Since Oracle was willing to transfer the OOo source code copyrights
[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Eric
On 10/06/11 18:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org
+1 (non-binding)
- Don Harbison
Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote on 06/10/2011 12:02:44 PM:
Please cast your votes:
[ X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
This vote will close 72
+1 (binding)
Dick
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:06 PM, donald_harbi...@us.ibm.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
- Don Harbison
Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote on 06/10/2011 12:02:44 PM:
Please cast your votes:
[ X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent
[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
I would like to humbly beg you people from Apache for giving a chance to
those who are willing to join you. I am deeply sorry that we are
bringing a big political dispute with us. My hope is that the community
that was so heavily
the archives for this month:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
This vote
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
I like the Apache license and I think having a really free alternative
is good for everyone, as much as clang vs gcc and linux vs FreeBSD.
Apache is also a good fit for OO technologically and I think the
incubation process will end up
and review the archives for this month:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
Please cast your votes:
I'm +1
If accepted, I'll try to help out with the podling, but alas I've not got
time at the moment to take on a full mentorship role of it.
Nick
-
To
Please cast your votes:
[ +1 ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Danese
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
On 6/10/11 12:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be
winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept
OpenOffice.org
On 6/10/2011 11:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
+1 [binding]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
+1 [binding]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:20 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 6/10/2011 11:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
+1 [binding
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Non-binding.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
For us outsiders, can you explain who is allowed to vote and in what way,
please?
S.
Anyone is allowed to vote. If you vote against, please, explain why.
Most of votes do not count anyway, negative votes are usually
addressed.
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:45 PM,
Simon,
Anyone interested can VOTE. If u see some of the votes they have
(binding) in the text, those are from folks on the incubator pmc.
Ultimately if we see a whole bunch of -1's then we check which way the
pmc voted to decide if the proposal was accepted or not.
So please go ahead and vote to
Awesome, thanks.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Alexei Fedotov alexei.fedo...@gmail.comwrote:
Anyone is allowed to vote. If you vote against, please, explain why.
Most of votes do not count anyway, negative votes are usually
addressed.
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Sorry for ignorance but what does binding - non-binding mean?
--
Ian
Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ)
www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940
The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth,
Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England
+1 (non-binding)
S.
binding is used by members of the incubator pmc [1]
-- dims
[1] http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator-pmc
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for ignorance but what does binding - non-binding mean?
--
Ian
Ofqual Accredited IT
On 10 June 2011 17:49, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
Simon,
Anyone interested can VOTE. If u see some of the votes they have
(binding) in the text, those are from folks on the incubator pmc.
Ultimately if we see a whole bunch of -1's then we check which way the
pmc voted to
Sorry, should have said +1 [binding]
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Danese Cooper dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Please cast your votes:
[ +1 ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Danese
to scan
and review the archives for this month:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Please cast your votes:
[X ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
This vote will close 72 hours from now.
(non
/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
This vote will close 72 hours from now.
- Sam Ruby
= OpenOffice.org - An open productivity
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
for this month:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/browser
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
This vote will close 72 hours from now
On 6/10/2011 11:45 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
For us outsiders, can you explain who is allowed to vote and in what way,
please?
Everyone is welcome to vote.
Binding votes include all Incubator Project Management Committee members.
Non-binding votes can and do influence the opinions of committee
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
