On 01.10.2014 05:41, Greg Stein wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
To the concrete question, the Subversion project never calls a strict
[VOTE] for new committers or PMC
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:52 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
...The HTTP Server project has successfully operated by unanimity...
As a side note, I often tell people that IMO the HTTP Server is so
modular because people couldn't agree on things - it's much easier to
get
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
...
Specifically, we (CouchDB) see voting as the failure mode of a
discussion (a useful one non-the-less), or as a last-step requirement
to officiate a particular set of project-level decisions (that are
fully enumerated
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
To the concrete question, the Subversion project never calls a strict
[VOTE] for new committers or PMC members. We discuss first, and that sets
the direction. People throw out +1 messages, but that is sure, make it so
rather
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
To the concrete question, the Subversion project never calls a strict
[VOTE] for new committers or PMC members. We discuss first, and that sets
As an additional reference, here's a previous thread on the topic:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201303.mbox/%3ccapfnckijy6tm5tycfn7msch6h0v_ear7ws5qmftegaoo+do...@mail.gmail.com%3E
Cheers,
Brett
On 26 Sep 2014, at 1:59 pm, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
In a
From: Joe Brockmeiermailto:j...@zonker.net javascript:;
Sent: 9/26/2014 5:00 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org javascript:;mailto:
general@incubator.apache.org javascript:;
Subject: Re: Committer Voting and Vetos
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014, at 10:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:52 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
The HTTP Server PMC has succeeded in working through these issues without
evicting a project member, and continuing to make progress.
There is a lot of credit due for this.
Of course, there are different stresses
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014, at 10:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
In a past discussion about by-laws, some folks were adamant that voting
for new committer and PMC members be consensus votes so a single person
can block the adding of a candidate.
Do any projects use some form of majority voting for new
Hey Alex
If during a new committer vote someone is giving a negative vote then the
reasoning should be included with that vote and a discussion can follow
around why the person was given the negative vote, this should all occur on
the private@ mailing list for that project. If there is hesitation
From: Joe Brockmeiermailto:j...@zonker.net
Sent: 9/26/2014 5:00 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.orgmailto:general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Committer Voting and Vetos
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014, at 10:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
In a past discussion about by-laws
. How the vote is
conducted is covered well by Joe.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Joe Brockmeiermailto:j...@zonker.net
Sent: 9/26/2014 5:00 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.orgmailto:general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Committer Voting and Vetos
.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Joe Brockmeiermailto:j...@zonker.net javascript:;
Sent: 9/26/2014 5:00 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org javascript:;mailto:
general@incubator.apache.org javascript:;
Subject: Re: Committer Voting and Vetos
.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Joe Brockmeiermailto:j...@zonker.net javascript:;
Sent: 9/26/2014 5:00 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org javascript:;mailto:
general@incubator.apache.org javascript:;
Subject: Re: Committer Voting and Vetos
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
In a past discussion about by-laws, some folks were adamant that voting
for new committer and PMC members be consensus votes so a single person
can block the adding of a candidate.
Do any projects use some form of majority
In a past discussion about by-laws, some folks were adamant that voting
for new committer and PMC members be consensus votes so a single person
can block the adding of a candidate.
Do any projects use some form of majority voting for new committers? What
are the reasons for allowing vetoes?
16 matches
Mail list logo
