On 23 July 2012 05:50, Alexei Fedotov alexei.fedo...@gmail.com wrote:
Jukka, thanks for explaining.
Ross, Andrus,
would you please consider voting for the Openmeetings release? We are stuck
with insufficient number of votes. Thanks!
Apologies - I've been on the road for nearly three weeks.
Hi Ross,
we will be happy to get your feedback on the release,
but there is no need to rush, we got enough IPMC votes now to proceed
Sebastian
2012/7/25 Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org:
On 23 July 2012 05:50, Alexei Fedotov alexei.fedo...@gmail.com wrote:
Jukka, thanks for explaining.
Andrus, thanks!
We also have a shepherd. Matt, aren't you, by chance, IPMC?
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
Hi Alexei,
I am
BTW, most current people's memberships across apache cane be checked here:
http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
On Jul 24, 2012, at 2:12 PM, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
Andrus, thanks!
We also have a shepherd. Matt, aren't you, by chance, IPMC?
--
With best regards / с наилучшими
Hi Alexei,
I am listed as a mentor in error at
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openmeetings.html . I was the champion on
the proposal. But even though I like the project, I knew I wouldn't be able to
lead you through incubator and give all needed attention due to other
commitments. So I
Jukka, thanks for explaining.
Ross, Andrus,
would you please consider voting for the Openmeetings release? We are stuck
with insufficient number of votes. Thanks!
Incubator folks,
Don't allow another little cute kitten and fluffy puppy die by missing
Apache Openmeetings (Incubating) release:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Alexei Fedotov
alexei.fedo...@gmail.com wrote:
The release vote have successfully passed and forwarded to general@
list [1]. What should be our next step? Have we got Incubator PMC
approval? Can we proceed with wider distribution?
See
Hello Jukka,
You wrote:
IP clearance - No release:Openmeetings
The release vote have successfully passed and forwarded to general@
list [1]. What should be our next step? Have we got Incubator PMC
approval? Can we proceed with wider distribution?
[1]
[cc-ed to dev@ and changed the subject]
Hello Jukka,
You wrote:
IP clearance - No release:Openmeetings
The release vote have successfully passed and forwarded to general@
list [1]. What should be our next step? Have we got Incubator PMC
approval? Can we proceed with wider
Here are some thoughts about this based on my particular experiences.
So I won't preface each particular observation with 'In my
experience.'
There is a narrative around the Foundation about 'Diversity'. The
narrative goes like this: once upon a time, one (or more) projects
were predominantly
http://javaadventure.blogspot.ie/2012/07/do-you-want-to-become-maven-committer.html
is an example that comdev might want to propagate?
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are some thoughts about this based on my particular experiences.
So I
On 17 July 2012 11:44, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
http://javaadventure.blogspot.ie/2012/07/do-you-want-to-become-maven-committer.html
is an example that comdev might want to propagate?
I think this is a really interesting experiment and look forward to
seeing the outcomes.
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
This is great stuff. It implies the ComDev PPMC ought to focus on the low
diversity trap while Incubator focuses on more process driven IP, release,
graduation.
Sounds good.
Of course this means we should
Hi
Sent from my Samdung Galaxy S3
Apologies for any typos
On Jul 16, 2012 1:41 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
This is great stuff. It implies the ComDev PPMC ought to focus on the
low
Subject: Incubation state transitions and stuck projects (Was: February
report review)
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
My suggestion is to ask the podlings now in category 2 to report again
in May on their progress on the identified
This is great stuff. It implies the ComDev PPMC ought to focus on the low
diversity trap while Incubator focuses on more process driven IP, release,
graduation.
Of course this means we should figure our exactly what low diversity is.
As discussed recently low diversity is not a problem if the
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
My suggestion is to ask the podlings now in category 2 to report again
in May on their progress on the identified blockers. If there's been
no measurable progress by then, we'll dig deeper to see what we can
do.
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Zeta Components just submitted a late report, and Brett mentioned on
npanday-dev@ that he'd write up something today.
The NPanday report is now in (thanks, Brett!), and seems to confirm my
categorization of
+1
I'd also suggest that the below is a partial answer to the board's
questions to the IPMC on how it would improve oversight so it should
probably go in our report.
cheers,
Leo
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Sam
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged
NPanday and Zeta Components that have still not reported (both also
missed their
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Sam suggested asking prodlings in category 2 to report back again next
month on their progress towards solving the mentioned issues.
Hey, now don't go and start spreading false rumors here. Particularly
as the
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Sam suggested asking prodlings in category 2 to report back again next
month on their progress towards solving the mentioned issues.
Hey,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
By July we should then have a
pretty accurate record of progress throughout the entire Incubator,
including a clear list of podlings that are stuck and need help.
+1
- Sam Ruby
Hi,
The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged
NPanday and Zeta Components that have still not reported (both also
missed their previous
: February report review
Hi,
The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged
NPanday and Zeta Components that have still not reported (both
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged
NPanday and
Hi Joe,
On Feb 8, 2012, at 6:42 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Anybody know what the holdup is for Amber regarding IP Clearance?
I think [0] summarizes it pretty well
Regards
Antonio
[0] http://amber.markmail.org/message/yrcy376p5cmvxv5q
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged
NPanday and
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged
NPanday and
...@gmail.com
To: general general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 12:37 PM
Subject: February report review
Hi,
The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
issues (like
To: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com; general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: February report review
Thanks Jukka, a fair exaltation of the projects I'm involved with.
Single sign off should not be a concern. There are a couple of projects where
From: Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: February report review
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The podling reports
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
I don't mean this to sound like a yes, but, but you have identified
12 podlings that aren't new and aren't ready to graduate. Are there
active plans to address the top issue
- Original Message -
From: Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: February report review
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some
Hi,
On Wednesday, February 8, 2012, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
wrote:
From: Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
P.S. This may very well piss off four people, but have you
- Original Message -
From: Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: February report review
Hi,
On Wednesday, February 8, 2012, Joe Schaefer joe_schae
Jukka,
I'd love to see you step up, even if only for a short period alongside
Noel, or as chair.
As I've repeated many times I'm keen to work with the IPMC to find the
right setup between here and ComDev. That will take a little time. I agree
that the approach you are taking here is a good one.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: February report review
39 matches
Mail list logo
