Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2010-05-05 Thread Luciano Resende
Apache PhotArk will be a complete open source photo gallery application including a content repository for the images, a display piece, an access control layer, and upload capabilities. The idea is to have a rigid design for the content repository with a very flexible display piece. The images in

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-09-10 Thread Luciano Resende
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Tim Williamswilliam...@gmail.com wrote: I have a need for something like this coming up and have been passively looking at PhotArk.  I'd suggest that a project like this would do itself good by having a simple architecture diagram[1], some good screenshots[2],

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-09-09 Thread Tim Williams
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:59 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: Based on the current active members of the community, it's then going  to be hard to get this

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-09-08 Thread sebb
On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please see details below : Looks OK now - the issues I raised have been fixed, thanks. --- The artifacts are available for review at:

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-09-08 Thread Luciano Resende
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please  see details below :  Looks OK now - the issues I raised have been fixed, thanks. This is great news,

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-09-08 Thread Luciano Resende
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:33 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:   On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:   A new RC is now available which should fix the items

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-09-08 Thread sebb
On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:33 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-09-08 Thread sebb
On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please see details below : Looks OK

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-09-08 Thread Luciano Resende
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:59 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: Based on the current active members of the community, it's then going  to be hard to get this release out !!! If by community you mean the IPMC, then the lack of response is

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-09-03 Thread sebb
On 02/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: A new RC is now available, please see details below : --- Please review and vote on the M1-incubating release artifacts of PhotArk. The artifacts are available for review at:

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-09-03 Thread Luciano Resende
A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please see details below : --- The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~lresende/photark/M1-incubating-RC4a/ This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report, and the Maven staging

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-09-02 Thread Luciano Resende
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:52 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: I did a cross-check to make sure only the used dependencies were  mentioned in the LICENSE and got the notices sniptes from these  required dependencies. Do you see a

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-09-02 Thread Luciano Resende
A new RC is now available, please see details below : --- Please review and vote on the M1-incubating release artifacts of PhotArk. The artifacts are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~lresende/photark/M1-incubating-RC4/ This includes the signed binary and source distributions,

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-09-01 Thread sebb
On 31/08/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for all the reviews and feedback for the PhotArk RC2. I have fixed all the severe and blocking issues and have produced a new RC... Please follow the link below for the new RC details :

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-09-01 Thread Luciano Resende
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:57 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31/08/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for all the reviews and feedback for the PhotArk RC2. I have  fixed all the severe and blocking issues and have produced a new RC...  Please follow the link below for

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-08-30 Thread Luciano Resende
Thanks for all the reviews and feedback for the PhotArk RC2. I have fixed all the severe and blocking issues and have produced a new RC... Please follow the link below for the new RC details : http://www.mail-archive.com/photark-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00145.html Thanks -- Luciano Resende

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-08-22 Thread Luciano Resende
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:16 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: Sigs and hashes OK; tgz and zip agree with each other. However, the source archive does not agree with the SVN tag - the versions are different in various pom.xml files. Can you give me one example ? The verious pom.xml should have

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-08-22 Thread sebb
On 22/08/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:16 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: Sigs and hashes OK; tgz and zip agree with each other. However, the source archive does not agree with the SVN tag - the versions are different in various pom.xml

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-08-20 Thread Luciano Resende
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Luciano Resendeluckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: Apache PhotArk will be a complete open source photo gallery application including a content repository for the images, a display piece, an access control layer, and upload capabilities. The idea is to have a rigid

Re: Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-08-20 Thread sebb
On 20/08/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Luciano Resendeluckbr1...@gmail.com wrote: Apache PhotArk will be a complete open source photo gallery application including a content repository for the images, a display piece, an access control

Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-08-14 Thread Luciano Resende
Apache PhotArk will be a complete open source photo gallery application including a content repository for the images, a display piece, an access control layer, and upload capabilities. The idea is to have a rigid design for the content repository with a very flexible display piece. The images in

Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-04-19 Thread Luciano Resende
Apache PhotArk will be a complete open source photo gallery application including a content repository for the images, a display piece, an access control layer, and upload capabilities. The idea is to have a rigid design for the content repository with a very flexible display piece. The images in