Thank you!
Using Apache License 2.0 as the single license makes sense to me.
Best,
tison.
Shane Curcuru 于2024年5月2日周四 19:55写道：
> (Moving general@incubator and dev@community to BCC since this is really
> a legal question about ASF licensing)
>
> tison wrote on 5/1/24 11:25 PM:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
(Moving general@incubator and dev@community to BCC since this is really
a legal question about ASF licensing)
tison wrote on 5/1/24 11:25 PM:
Hi,
IIUC, the Apache License 2.0 is mainly to license code and related stuff
that constructs the final software.
However, projects may also create
Hi,
The CC BY 4.0 is not compatible with the Apache license, so I would avoid it if
you can. While the Apache license is intended for code, it’s OK to use for
documentation as well.
Kind Regards,
Justin
> On 2 May 2024, at 1:25 pm, tison wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> IIUC, the Apache License 2.0 is
Hi,
IIUC, the Apache License 2.0 is mainly to license code and related stuff
that constructs the final software.
However, projects may also create text content like documents. Is it
appropriate to use Apache License 2.0 for them (since quite a few terms may
not be applicable)? Or what licenses
