Re: MX4J dependency in Geode

Done. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-244 Anthony > On Apr 6, 2016, at 8:57 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > Hi, > > I agree with Justin and Bertrand's analysis, but I would also request > that you open a LEGAL Jira requesting that the MX4J license be added

Re: MX4J dependency in Geode

Hi, I agree with Justin and Bertrand's analysis, but I would also request that you open a LEGAL Jira requesting that the MX4J license be added to the list of approved licenses. MX4J is not only similar to Apache 1.1, but also to the PHP license. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#category-a

Re: MX4J dependency in Geode

Thanks for the help! Anthony > On Apr 6, 2016, at 4:50 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > INAL but this is what I would do: > - Add a pointer (i.e. path to the file) and the copyright owner to the full > text of the license in LICENSE > - Add the notice “This product

Re: MX4J dependency in Geode

Hi, INAL but this is what I would do: - Add a pointer (i.e. path to the file) and the copyright owner to the full text of the license in LICENSE - Add the notice “This product includes software developed by the MX4J project ..” mentioned in the MX4J license to the NOTICE file (i.e. exactly

Re: MX4J dependency in Geode

Hi, On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: >...The file in question has a license [4] > that is similar but different to ASF v1.1 [5] IANAL but my reading of [4] is that the only requirement beyond a typical MIT-style license is including the "This product

MX4J dependency in Geode

I'm working on clearing an issue [1] found during the review for Geode 1.0.0-incubating.M1 [2] (thanks Justin!). We have a bundled source dependency on an MX4J file [3]. The file in question has a license [4] that is similar but different to ASF v1.1 [5]. How should we deal with this license?