Hi,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:37 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
> >... For straight-to-TLP projects, like your Training proposal, I think the
> > initial PMC should consist only of Apache Members.
>
> While that seem like a good idea it’s not been the case with all PMC members
> on previous TLP. ...
Hi,
> For straight-to-TLP projects, like your Training proposal, I think the
> initial PMC should consist only of Apache Members.
While that seem like a good idea it’s not been the case with all PMC members on
previous TLP.
It’s really up to the board to decide if they accept a straight to
Thanks for the feedback everyone.
The general outline makes sense to me and it is reassuring that I didn't
miss anything too obvious.
I'll wait to see if a discussion is going to develop on the exact form this
is going to happen in.
Cheers,
Lars
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:14 AM Bertrand
Hi Lars,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 5:35 PM Lars Francke wrote:
> ...Proposals (and this especially) are a way to be granted something that you
> usually have to work for (prove merit)
I agree that being listed as an initial committer on podling proposals
is a way to get committership without
Some very general guidance - https://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
From: Lars Francke
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2019 8:34:10 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Meritocracy, initial contri
Hi,
> Is everyone just added to the list of contributors/PMC members?
In my experience for a project going via the incubator generally anyone who
asks is added (I can only recall one case where this was not the case and it
had a very large list of initial committers).
For straight to TLPs
Hello everyone,
I should have thought of this before, but I didn't. I also did some
research in the mailing list archives, but the search terms are so common,
I didn't come up with anything.
Meritocracy is valued strongly at the ASF. Usually it is granted post-fact
when someone has proven her-
