Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

Saturday, December 31, 2016, 5:33:19 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Just to level set. I don't think its fair to expect a special policy for a > single podling. To be clear, I'm just asking a question, since there's no written policy regarding the Maven version number as far as I know. So I suppose

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

I'll point out that the link Martjin pointed to is a follow up conversation after the vote thread that originally introduced allowing podling artifacts to be distributed via Maven.

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

Just to level set. I don't think its fair to expect a special policy for a single podling. On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 9:40 AM Daniel Dekany wrote: > The original question in this thread is much less generic than in the > linked one though, so it's certainly easier to answer.

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

Hi all Am .12.2016, 15:40 Uhr, schrieb Daniel Dekany : The original question in this thread is much less generic than in the linked one though, so it's certainly easier to answer. Just as a reminder, the specialities are these: - This project already have suffixless

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

The original question in this thread is much less generic than in the linked one though, so it's certainly easier to answer. Just as a reminder, the specialities are these: - This project already have suffixless releases from before incubation, which are widely used. If the incubation fails,

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

Thanks for the link Martjin! Definitely a late night reading exercise. Maybe since Jukka and Bertrand are around they can give us feedback as well :-) Either way will digest. John On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 7:50 AM Martijn Dashorst wrote: > For reference, please read

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

For reference, please read this thread from 2008: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0b6c065a908c5f9ec39fa78c31b39c83a6fea29eb34fada0ee070413@1222432864@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E It has all the arguments for and against the -incubating versioning label, and why the disclaimer exists.

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Martijn Dashorst < martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > [...] > Freemarker has been in incubation for 17 months. What do you need to > learn and do before you will start your graduation vote? > In my opinion the Freemarker project would be ready to successfully

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

Thursday, December 29, 2016, 9:41:20 PM, Emilian Bold wrote: În joi, 29 dec. 2016 la 21:44 Martijn Dashorst a scris: > You are trying to fix the wrong thing. The whole idea of the > -incubating moniker is to communicate to end users that the project > is inside the

Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 5:35 AM Daniel Dekany wrote: > Wednesday, December 28, 2016, 4:12:06 AM, Christopher wrote: > > [snip] > > The one complication here is that the release artifact (source tarball) > is > > most easily created with a maven project by using the >