At the current moment I'm not sure there is a strictly definitive
answer, given that Oracle technically still owns the trademark. When we
have specific legal questions that need to be worked on, we can work
with Sam and the privately archived legal-internal@ mailing list.
Once the ASF has the
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Alexandro Colorado
> wrote:
> >
> > I have the feeling none of the Apache people have read the OOo site
> > regarding this topic.
>
> I see your name on OpenOfficeProposal. That means that you will be
> one of the
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
> I have the feeling none of the Apache people have read the OOo site
> regarding this topic.
I see your name on OpenOfficeProposal. That means that you will be
one of the people we will be depending on to help. That's how things
work
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Ralph Goers >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Jun 5, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Ralph Goers <
> ral
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>> There is a pending trademark application for OpenOffice by Tightrope
>> Interactive so I am not sure that Apache OpenOffice would be acceptable
>> unless the pending application is turned
On Jun 5, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 5, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Ralph Goers >> wrote:
>>>
There is a pending trademark application for OpenOffic
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Ralph Goers >wrote:
> >
> >> There is a pending trademark application for OpenOffice by Tightrope
> >> Interactive so I am not sure that Apache OpenOf
On Jun 5, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>> There is a pending trademark application for OpenOffice by Tightrope
>> Interactive so I am not sure that Apache OpenOffice would be acceptable
>> unless the pending application is tur
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> There is a pending trademark application for OpenOffice by Tightrope
> Interactive so I am not sure that Apache OpenOffice would be acceptable
> unless the pending application is turned down.
>
Actually that trademark application is of deep con
On Jun 5, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> Hi I want to know if there is any formal clearance on the way OpenOffice.org
> ought to be reffered as.
>
> Since the adquisition of Sun by Oracle, they start re-inciting misquotations
> of OpenOffice.org as "OpenOffice" even later they mod
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> There is a pending trademark application for OpenOffice by Tightrope
> Interactive so I am not sure that Apache OpenOffice would be acceptable
> unless the pending application is turned down.
>
I will still enoucrage that play safe according to
There is a pending trademark application for OpenOffice by Tightrope
Interactive so I am not sure that Apache OpenOffice would be acceptable unless
the pending application is turned down.
Ralph
On Jun 5, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> Hi I want to know if there is any formal cle
Hi I want to know if there is any formal clearance on the way OpenOffice.org
ought to be reffered as.
Since the adquisition of Sun by Oracle, they start re-inciting misquotations
of OpenOffice.org as "OpenOffice" even later they modified StarOffice as
"Oracle Open Office"
As OpenOffice.org was tr
13 matches
Mail list logo
