Stephen McConnell wrote:
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
unnecessary and unwarranted disruption of an incubator project
Let it go.
snip/
I would like to retract my comments above.
good! This sounds like progress. Is the issue now resolved as far as the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list is
Leo Simons wrote:
Is the issue now resolved as far as the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list
is concerned
We can hope.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Steven Noels wrote:
Please, not here. I'm quite confident that a good portion of the
inhabitants of this list doesn't care much about who is going to win
this flamefest. At least I am not, and I can imagine that neither
general@ nor [EMAIL
Brian Behlendorf wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Steven Noels wrote:
Please, not here. I'm quite confident that a good portion of the
inhabitants of this list doesn't care much about who is going to win
this flamefest. At least I am not, and I can imagine that neither
unnecessary and unwarranted disruption of an incubator project
Let it go. No one other than you is characterizing it that way. Just let
it go.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
unnecessary and unwarranted disruption of an incubator project
Let it go. No one other than you is characterizing it that way. Just let
it go.
I let it go for three months and now I'm seeing the consequences on not
speaking up earlier. If people here think it is
Steven Noels wrote:
...
But that is not what we are talking about ATM... I see two persons
bringing bad vibes into the wrong places. That will reflect badly upon
both of them. What I was trying to suggest is that those persons try and
find a solution amongst themselves.
David Blevins wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Steven Noels wrote:
Please, not here. I'm quite confident that a good portion of the
inhabitants of this list doesn't care much about who is going to win
this flamefest. At least I am not, and I can imagine that neither
general@ nor [EMAIL PROTECTED] are to
Nicola:
If you have a problem with my annoyance at your presumption to preach -
then present it here away from any particular project.
Stephen.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
As an innocent bystander of the flamewar that spawned this email:
Nicola commented on some technical changes, it started deteriorating
into shed painting, Nicola posted an email on de-escalating conflict in
technical discussions, then Stephen attacked Nicola directly for some
On 08 Jul 2004, at 18:38, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Brian McCallister wrote:
As an innocent bystander of the flamewar that spawned this email:
Nicola commented on some technical changes, it started deteriorating
into shed painting, Nicola posted an email on de-escalating conflict
in technical
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I'm quite confident that a good portion of the inhabitants
of this list doesn't care much about who is going to win
this flamefest.
+1
There is a sense in which a general discussion on community building
techniques and communication skills is worthwhile. I've suggested to
, 2004 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: Personal attacks and respect
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I'm quite confident that a good portion of the inhabitants
of this list doesn't care much about who is going to win
this flamefest.
+1
There is a sense in which a general discussion on community building
I've suggested to Nicola Ken that he start work on a web page
to cover ideals, techniques and scenarios [related to community
building and conversation skills]
-1
Sorry but Nicola Ken is not qualified.
Your opinion is noted, but that is not your call to make. I asked him if he
would
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I've suggested to Nicola Ken that he start work on a web page
to cover ideals, techniques and scenarios [related to community
building and conversation skills]
-1
Sorry but Nicola Ken is not qualified.
Your opinion is noted, but that is not your call to make. I asked him
On 08 Jul 2004, at 20:48, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I'm quite confident that a good portion of the inhabitants
of this list doesn't care much about who is going to win
this flamefest.
+1
There is a sense in which a general discussion on community building
techniques and communication skills is
From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 8:58 PM
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I'm quite confident that a good portion of the inhabitants of this
list doesn't care much about who is going to win
this flamefest.
+1
There is a sense in which a
I've suggested to Nicola Ken that he start work on a web page to
cover ideals, techniques and scenarios [regarding communication
skills and other useful community building techniques.]
I figure your suggestion and the assumedly planned work can't have
anything to do with what is happening
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:09:13AM +0200, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry but Nicola Ken is not qualified. I'm sorry Nicola but
you instigated this and only you can fix it.
Stephen, saying that someone is not
On 09 Jul 2004, at 03:44, David Blevins wrote:
I really don't want to get caught in the cross-fire, but...you could
call each other up and talk/yell this out on the phone and get the
argument over quickly.
+1, but some people just *need* the audience, alas. ;-)
(now i'm really gone)
/Steven
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
