On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
IMO, it doesn’t matter so long as the original vote to accept the proposal
includes the entire proposal.
It would be inconvenient if people don't use the wiki or some other form where
the evolution of the proposal
On 23 November 2014 at 03:16, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
The current way the proposal page is written, the wiki for proposals is
optional. I don't think this is the case any longer, since it looks like
we request that all proposals get put there first.
Does anyone
On Nov 22, 2014, at 6:16 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
The current way the proposal page is written, the wiki for proposals is
optional. I don't think this is the case any longer, since it looks like
we request that all proposals get put there first.
Other IPMC
Alan,
I'm referring to [1], where under Developing The Proposal and The Vote it
seems to list the wiki as one solution or an option rather than the
proper place to put proposals. Not any specific proposal that has come up
recently.
John
[1]:
Yep, I think I understood which proposal page to which you refer to.
My opinion is still the same. It doesn’t matter so long as the original vote
to accept the proposal includes the entire proposal. We should always be
thinking less rules, less process, less roles.
Incubation is already a
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
Does anyone mind if I rephrase the page to make it mandatory to use the
wiki for proposals?
I’m sorry I was “out the past few weeks. What proposal attempted to post a
proposal that was not on the wiki? What
On 23 November 2014 at 17:20, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
Does anyone mind if I rephrase the page to make it mandatory to use the
wiki for proposals?
I’m sorry I was “out the past few weeks.
On Nov 23, 2014, at 8:40 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
I dont want to criminalize anybody, but on the other hand I would like to
have 1 common place where to look for accepted proposals.
Having the proposals, at least after acceptance, in one place should be
beneficial to everyone, so
On 23 November 2014 at 19:41, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Nov 23, 2014, at 8:40 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
I dont want to criminalize anybody, but on the other hand I would like to
have 1 common place where to look for accepted proposals.
Having the proposals,
it that way.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: jan imailto:j...@apache.org
Sent: 11/23/2014 11:00 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.orgmailto:general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposals - wiki required?
On 23 November 2014 at 19:41, Alan Cabrera l
benevolent editor, it is useful to have a wiki for the ground-truth du
jour, addition of initial committers, etc.
-Original Message-
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2014 11:00
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposals - wiki required?
On 23
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposals - wiki required?
On 23 November 2014 at 19:41, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
[ ... ]
As for storing them in one place after acceptance, why?
SImple so that new recruits can go and get ideas of how to interpret the
different headlines. The headlines
All,
The current way the proposal page is written, the wiki for proposals is
optional. I don't think this is the case any longer, since it looks like
we request that all proposals get put there first.
Does anyone mind if I rephrase the page to make it mandatory to use the
wiki for proposals?
13 matches
Mail list logo
