RE: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-30 Thread Sander Striker
From: Ted Leung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:10 AM You do realize that I'm neither a member of the Incubator PMC nor do I support its existence. Create the mail list. The name shouldn't be up to the Incubator, it should be up to the XML PMC. Its you're baby,

Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-30 Thread Ted Leung
On 7/30/2003 4:59 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Ted Leung wrote, On 30/07/2003 12.15: And can we get it on the website, please? Well, I would personally say no to having the grant itself there. Donations to the ASF should at least come through members IMHO and having the document there

Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-29 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Steven Noels wrote, On 29/07/2003 18.50: On 29/07/2003 10:41 Berin Lautenbach wrote: Steven Noels wrote: and see to bring XMLBeans where people can actually help them out. Apart from Nicola's apparent efforts in keeping the Incubator alive, most of the real action is done by infrastructure

Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-29 Thread Roy T. Fielding
I've no issue with rules, except when we say we have rules but can't articulate them. Example #1. What should the names of the mailing lists and CVS be? [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] We don't have that rule. Nicola Ken suggested creating such a rule. My opinion is that we will

Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-25 Thread Tetsuya Kitahata
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:14:04 +0200 Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] project-subproject CVS [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm 0 on both suggestions. Go with this one for now*. And lets not delay kicking off a project for this for too

Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-25 Thread Erik Abele
On 25/07/2003, at 02:05, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: On 7/25/03 7:46 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's simple: The Incubator PMC is responsible for the project. All others (can) help. No this is difference than in the past. Remember the Incubator is here to help and its OUR

RE: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-25 Thread Sander Striker
From: Erik Abele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 3:18 PM [...] Okay, I'm fine with this for now, but without an explicitly stated policy this discussion will come up every time a project arrives at the incubator. We definitely need a policy here, IMHO! I agree. I

Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-25 Thread B. W. Fitzpatrick
Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 07:23 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: IMHO it depends on what the incubator PMC does. If they *do* create the lists and the such then maybe they should set policy (meaning telling other people what do do ==

Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeans project )

2003-07-25 Thread Tetsuya Kitahata
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 23:27:13 +0900 Tetsuya Kitahata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ e.g. The XXX pmc has agreed to accept the YYY project for incubation. To aid in the process, Please create these below: