RAT [Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7]

On 4/27/07, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Also, I'm all for requesting that incubating projects requesting IPMC approval of a release provide a RAT report as well as explanations for any missing license headers since that's a focus of a lot of the ensuing conversation about a release.

Re: all licenses go into the LICENSE file (was: Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7)

On 4/30/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Apr 25, 2007, at 6:23 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Wednesday 25 April 2007 11:55, Patrick Linskey wrote: >>> * OpenJPA includes software developed by the SERP project >>> Copyright (c) 2002-2006, A. Abram White. All rights reserved. >>>

all licenses go into the LICENSE file (was: Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7)

On Apr 25, 2007, at 6:23 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Wednesday 25 April 2007 11:55, Patrick Linskey wrote: * OpenJPA includes software developed by the SERP project Copyright (c) 2002-2006, A. Abram White. All rights reserved. The "All rights reserved." means that it has not been properl

Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

+1 (binding) Also, I'm all for requesting that incubating projects requesting IPMC approval of a release provide a RAT report as well as explanations for any missing license headers since that's a focus of a lot of the ensuing conversation about a release. Eddie On 4/26/07, Michael Dick <[EM

Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

On 4/26/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, it's probably worth pointing out that schemas-doctype.rsrc is > OpenJPA IP, and not a redistribution of someone else's IP. Ah, OK. Hadn't seen this before I posted. --- Noel In future releases I'll remember to clarify t

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

> Also, it's probably worth pointing out that schemas-doctype.rsrc is > OpenJPA IP, and not a redistribution of someone else's IP. Ah, OK. Hadn't seen this before I posted. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

Patrick Linskey wrote: > I'm assuming that you're referring to these known issues from Mike's > original email Yes. > Yes; [some] are properly attributed in LICENSE.txt. Thanks. OK. > > java-keywords.rsrc does not contain IP. > To my knowledge, this is not discussed in the release. But no IP

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

ty named in this message. If you are not > the intended recipient, and have received this message in > error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednes

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 4:48 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7 > > > Known issues : [...] > > Are these noted anywhere in the distribution? > > --- Noel > >

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

n [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 4:48 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7 > > > Copyright (c) 2002-2006, A. Abram White. All rights reserved. > > Niclas' point is that "All Right

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

> Copyright (c) 2002-2006, A. Abram White. All rights reserved. Niclas' point is that "All Rights Reserved" has been a topic of discussion when dealing with an Open Source license. This may help explain: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200409.mbox/%3COF [EMAIL PROTE

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

> Known issues : [...] Are these noted anywhere in the distribution? --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

+1 I can't wait to start using the final release :) -dain On Apr 24, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Michael Dick wrote: We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a new release of OpenJPA. The vote email thread is available here: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE---THIRD-ATTEMPT--publish-openjpa-0.9.7- i

Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

+1 Craig On Apr 24, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Michael Dick wrote: We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a new release of OpenJPA. The vote email thread is available here: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE---THIRD-ATTEMPT--publish-openjpa-0.9.7- incubating-release-tf3620224.html

Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

Better late than never : http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/RAT/release-0.9.7-rat-output.txt There are a few known issues which I mentioned in the original vote email, and a few files which do not contain IP which have been discu

Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

+1 for the release On 4/25/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/25/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FWIW, I think that RAT was run at some point during the process. Ah great! Maybe next release, include a link to the RAT report too to avoid folks asking about it

Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

On 4/25/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FWIW, I think that RAT was run at some point during the process. Ah great! Maybe next release, include a link to the RAT report too to avoid folks asking about it :) -- James --- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ ---

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

I don't think that my vote counts on this alias, but hey, I'll vote anyways: +1 -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. ___ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Syst

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

immediately return this by email and then delete it. > -Original Message- > From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 9:57 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7 > > +1 looks good

Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

+1 looks good to me. It might be worth running RAT against the release next time to double check that all the license headers are properly applied etc. On 4/24/07, Michael Dick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a new release of OpenJPA. The vote email thr

Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

On Wednesday 25 April 2007 11:55, Patrick Linskey wrote: > >   * OpenJPA includes software developed by the SERP project > >     Copyright (c) 2002-2006, A. Abram White. All rights reserved. > > > > The "All rights reserved." means that it has not been > > properly licensed, and I as the licensee o

RE: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

please immediately return this by email and then delete it. > -Original Message- > From: Niclas Hedhman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 8:01 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7 > > On

Re: [VOTE] approve release of OpenJPA 0.9.7

On Wednesday 25 April 2007 04:02, Michael Dick wrote: In the NOTICE file we find; * OpenJPA includes software developed by the SERP project Copyright (c) 2002-2006, A. Abram White. All rights reserved. The "All rights reserved." means that it has not been properly licensed, and I as the li