On 2/19/09, Thilo Goetz wrote:
> Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>> I have put XAP's status to a vote. What others do people feel should be
>>> considered? I have several in mind, but want to hear from the Mentors
>>> and
>>> the Commun
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> We should probably try to find the collective energy to review UIMA
> before the project's enthusiasm is sapped.
That sounds like a healthy observation. My Q for the community is; Do
you have a healthy and diverse set of users? If s
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>
>> We should probably try to find the collective energy to review UIMA
>> before the project's enthusiasm is sapped.
>
> That sounds like a healthy observation. My Q for the community is; Do
> you have a he
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
> My pet hypothesis (or maybe I'm just looking for excuses) is
> this: UIMA is heavily used in academia. Now academics have no
> problems with open source, to the contrary. But they have an
> overwhelming need to publish and build up a reput
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
>
>
>
>> My pet hypothesis (or maybe I'm just looking for excuses) is
>> this: UIMA is heavily used in academia. Now academics have no
>> problems with open source, to the contrary. But they have an
>> overwhelming ne
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> We should probably try to find the collective energy to review UIMA
> before the project's enthusiasm is sapped.
+1 I may be mistaken, but from the what I can tell UIMA has had to
manage with barely any mentor support for the p
> My pet hypothesis (or maybe I'm just looking for excuses) is
> this: UIMA is heavily used in academia. Now academics have no
> problems with open source, to the contrary. But they have an
> overwhelming need to publish and build up a reputation. So
> they like to publish their source code on t
On 2/20/09, Thilo Goetz wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> My pet hypothesis (or maybe I'm just looking for excuses) is
>>> this: UIMA is heavily used in academia. Now academics have no
>>> problems with open source, to the contrar
On 2/20/09, Janne Jalkanen wrote:
>> My pet hypothesis (or maybe I'm just looking for excuses) is
>> this: UIMA is heavily used in academia. Now academics have no
>> problems with open source, to the contrary. But they have an
>> overwhelming need to publish and build up a reputation. So
>> the
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
I know that we usually try to strongly encourage companies not to use
apache as dumping ground but I wonder sometimes whether it might be
useful to accept more contributions of proof-of-concept code
especially from academia. It's often easier to start from some proof
.org
> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 4:31:50 PM
> Subject: Re: UIMA [WAS Re: Suspending Projects]
>
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> > wrote:
> >
> >> We should probably try to find the collective energy to r
On Fri 20 Feb 2009 17:23, Thilo Goetz wrote:
>> Can you perhaps contact these individuals one-by-one and get their
>> view on how they see it. Perhaps ask them to publish their work in
>> parallel, and perhaps the 'OSS bug' will bite a couple of them??
>
> I have talked to quite a few of them, a
- Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr."
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 12:57:09 AM
> Subject: Re: UIMA [WAS Re: Suspending Projects]
>
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> >
> > I know that we
2009/2/20 Janne Jalkanen :
>> My pet hypothesis (or maybe I'm just looking for excuses) is
>> this: UIMA is heavily used in academia. Now academics have no
>> problems with open source, to the contrary. But they have an
>> overwhelming need to publish and build up a reputation. So
>> they like t
2009/2/20 Robert Burrell Donkin :
> On 2/20/09, Thilo Goetz wrote:
>> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
My pet hypothesis (or maybe I'm just looking for excuses) is
this: UIMA is heavily used in academia. Now academics have no
>>
.
Ross
>
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Thilo Goetz
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 4:31:50 PM
>> Subject: Re: UIMA [WAS Re
- Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Ross Gardler
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 10:40:12 PM
> Subject: Re: UIMA [WAS Re: Suspending Projects]
>
> 2009/2/21 Otis Gospodnetic :
> >
> > Perhaps GSOC is something to con
Ross
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Ross Gardler
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 10:40:12 PM
>> Subject: Re: UIMA
2009/2/20 William A. Rowe, Jr. :
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>
>> I know that we usually try to strongly encourage companies not to use
>> apache as dumping ground but I wonder sometimes whether it might be
>> useful to accept more contributions of proof-of-concept code
>> especially from acade
19 matches
Mail list logo
