On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
> On May 30, 2013, at 7:27 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 30, 2013, at 12:08 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>
>>> Looking in poddling.xml there are 3 poddlings marked "dormant" and nearly
>>> 30 marked "retired". The 3 dormant ones are from a
On May 30, 2013, at 7:27 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
> On May 30, 2013, at 12:08 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
>> Looking in poddling.xml there are 3 poddlings marked "dormant" and nearly
>> 30 marked "retired". The 3 dormant ones are from ages ago and looking back
>> in the archives its from when the
On May 30, 2013, at 12:08 AM, ant elder wrote:
> Looking in poddling.xml there are 3 poddlings marked "dormant" and nearly
> 30 marked "retired". The 3 dormant ones are from ages ago and looking back
> in the archives its from when there wasn't a documented retirement process
> and people didn't
On 30 May 2013 08:08, ant elder wrote:
> Looking in poddling.xml there are 3 poddlings marked "dormant" and nearly
> 30 marked "retired". The 3 dormant ones are from ages ago and looking back
> in the archives its from when there wasn't a documented retirement process
> and people didn't really kn
Looking in poddling.xml there are 3 poddlings marked "dormant" and nearly
30 marked "retired". The 3 dormant ones are from ages ago and looking back
in the archives its from when there wasn't a documented retirement process
and people didn't really know what to call it. IMHO the simplest thing to
a
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:36 PM, ant elder wrote:
> I agree with Mark and John, the terms mean different things, and the term
> "retired" is reasonably well understood now and mentioned in various places
> in the Incubator documentation so wouldn't it be better to keep it as is?
Question comes up
What we really need now is a few hundred more emails on this exciting subject,
just like every other year! At the end we can all agree to disagree and go
away sad that nothing ever gets done around here, just like every other year we
have this interesting debate!
Party on I say.
Sent from my
I can't see any place in the docs that describe dormant.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:36 PM, ant elder wrote:
> I agree with Mark and John, the terms mean different things, and the term
> "retired" is reasonably well understood now and mentioned in various places
> in the Incubator documentation s
I agree with Mark and John, the terms mean different things, and the term
"retired" is reasonably well understood now and mentioned in various places
in the Incubator documentation so wouldn't it be better to keep it as is?
Are there really any dormant poddlings? If so probably they are really
reti
If no one minds I will change them all to dormant, since all are welcome back
to the fold, should they so desire.
Regards,
Alan
On May 27, 2013, at 12:58 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:17 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>> I think the terms mean different things, from th
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:17 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> I think the terms mean different things, from the incubator perspective.
>
> Dormant - we're not active enough right now for a full community, but
> believe later on we can build it back up.
> Retired - we've given up all hope of becoming a T
+1 for this interpretation
--
John D. Ament schrieb am Mo., 27. Mai 2013 21:17 MESZ:
>I think the terms mean different things, from the incubator perspective.
>
>Dormant - we're not active enough right now for a full community, but
>believe later on we can build it
I think the terms mean different things, from the incubator perspective.
Dormant - we're not active enough right now for a full community, but
believe later on we can build it back up.
Retired - we've given up all hope of becoming a TLP, instead we think it's
best to archive the code/move it to gi
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> Yeah, I like the word dormant as well. Should we rename them all to dormant?
+1 from me. So far I don't see any difference in the end.
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On May 27, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Upayavira wrote:
>
>> I think it was just a ques
Yeah, I like the word dormant as well. Should we rename them all to dormant?
Regards,
Alan
On May 27, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> I think it was just a question of 'retiring' sounding too final. Using
> the word 'dormant' was less threatening, and made it more feasible for
> the pod
I think it was just a question of 'retiring' sounding too final. Using
the word 'dormant' was less threatening, and made it more feasible for
the podlings to go, well, dormant.
Upayavira
On Mon, May 27, 2013, at 05:39 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> They kinda sound the same. Why didn't podlings want
They kinda sound the same. Why didn't podlings want to retire? Does anyone
know?
Regards,
Alan
On May 27, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> I asked the same question in july 2011, and got a response from Henri
> Yandell which I repost here:
>
> "Given the PPMC is closed down,
I asked the same question in july 2011, and got a response from Henri
Yandell which I repost here:
"Given the PPMC is closed down, I think it has to be retired.
Dormant implies a PPMC is taking some time off.
Basically this is a larger version of "don't be afraid to delete a
line of code; it's i
Looking at the podlings.xml and it's not clear to me what the difference is.
I'm sure I neglected to read some documentation bit.
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
19 matches
Mail list logo
