On Sep 6, 2007, at 11:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 9/6/07, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...So, any advice on this matter?...
In my (totally non-lawyer) opinion, the cleanest way to change the
JSPWiki code to the Apache License might be for the project to rele
Yep, I got your point.
I've personally thought about possibility for users to run JSPWiki on
full Apache stack.
This could be nice out-of-the-box bundle: JSPWiki+Tomcat+Harmony
SY, Alexey
2007/9/6, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > What do you mean? Apache does not have n
In my (totally non-lawyer) opinion, the cleanest way to change the
JSPWiki code to the Apache License might be for the project to release
an Apache License version of their code, before coming to the
Incubator, using their existing release channels.
This would mean that the existing community
What do you mean? Apache does not have needed lower level projects to
run JSPWiki?
How about Tomcat+Harmony?
Well, let me put it this way: it would be kinda dumb to run our
public wiki site on another wiki engine. ;-)
We also have separate documentation and sandbox wikis.
http
2007/9/4, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Big +1 on JSPWiki. I've been a fan for years of the software and the
> community that drives it forward. There may be some issues with
> getting the JSPWiki web application up and running on Apache
> infrastructure, which will be necessa
On 9/6/07, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...So, any advice on this matter?...
In my (totally non-lawyer) opinion, the cleanest way to change the
JSPWiki code to the Apache License might be for the project to release
an Apache License version of their code, before comi
IANAL, but I am pretty sure you are right. However, I think there
is an issue
on "how simple is simple?". It seems common to talk about 10 lines
of code
are not infringements, but then noone give any hint of an upper
limit. I
think it would be good if it could be documented somehow, to get a
On Thursday 06 September 2007 00:45, Janne Jalkanen wrote:
> simple patches do not cross the
> boundary of an original work, and therefore cannot be claimed to be
> copyrighted.
IANAL, but I am pretty sure you are right. However, I think there is an issue
on "how simple is simple?". It seems
I believe Janne has already looked into this and has a good list of
all former contributors. Janne, can you comment on the difficulty of
this challenge?
Already ahead of you. We have all but one tracked down and all have
already agreed. The question is whether they need to sign CLAs or
whe
On 9/5/07, Bill Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > JSPWiki is a wiki engine available under the Lesser General Public
> > License.
>
> > The initial goals of the project is to release JSPWiki 2.8 under the
> > Apache license:
> Successfully executing
JSPWiki is a wiki engine available under the Lesser General Public
License.
The initial goals of the project is to release JSPWiki 2.8 under the
Apache license:
Successfully executing the license change could prove to be a
challenge. All past contributors to the project will need to agree
On 9/5/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Johnson wrote:
>
> > Big +1 on JSPWiki.
>
> > There may be some issues with getting [JSPWiki] up and running on Apache
> > infrastructure, which will be necessary for this effort, but I think
> >
Dave Johnson wrote:
> Big +1 on JSPWiki.
> There may be some issues with getting [JSPWiki] up and running on Apache
> infrastructure, which will be necessary for this effort, but I think
> we can overcome those.
Volunteering? ;-)
Big +1 on JSPWiki. I've been a fan for years of the software and the
community that drives it forward. There may be some issues with
getting the JSPWiki web application up and running on Apache
infrastructure, which will be necessary for this effort, but I think
we can overcome those.
-
This is interesting. Have you seen, that we are currently voting on
the
Jackrabbit list to enter Sling into the incubator. You may find more
information at [1].
Yes, actually I did. I think it is something we can consider
later. JSPWiki needs to do quite a lot of things internally than
Hi,
On 8/30/07, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am Janne Jalkanen, the lead developer of the open source wiki
> engine called JSPWiki, and I have a proposal for your enjoyment.
Nice!
> In the future, we expect to integrate somewhat with Jackrabbit.
Having worke
Hi Janne,
Am Donnerstag, den 30.08.2007, 00:02 +0300 schrieb Janne Jalkanen:
> Abstract
>
> Apache JSPWiki will be a modular and user-extensible wiki-engine,
> based on the open source JSPWiki software.
> ...
> * Clean up our metadata and backend support by adding JSR-
Hello all!
I am Janne Jalkanen, the lead developer of the open source wiki
engine called JSPWiki, and I have a proposal for your enjoyment.
This proposal is available in the web at http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/
ApacheJSPWikiProposal, should you wish to help us to make it better.
/Janne
201 - 218 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
