On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Does Apache has tools (like rat) to extract all the needed license? Digging
out the license manually is both labour intensive and error prone.
The rat community has started working on whisker[1] (and some other
tools) but we
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have generated your list of jars from looking at
kafka-0.7.0-incubating.tar.gz, the binary distribution that has been
built as a customary courtesy as part of the release attempt. This
includes quite a
On 29 November 2011 14:24, Eric Newton eric.new...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Accumulo, with the artifacts
versioned as 1.3.5-incubating.
VOTE:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accumulo-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg00939.html
RESULT:
On 2 December 2011 09:33, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have generated your list of jars from looking at
kafka-0.7.0-incubating.tar.gz, the binary distribution that has been
built as a
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:55 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 December 2011 09:33, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have generated your list of jars from looking at
On 2 December 2011 10:50, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 November 2011 14:24, Eric Newton eric.new...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Accumulo, with the artifacts
versioned as 1.3.5-incubating.
VOTE:
On 2 December 2011 10:50, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 November 2011 14:24, Eric Newton eric.new...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Accumulo, with the artifacts
versioned as 1.3.5-incubating.
VOTE:
Marvin says... supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date
(Wed, Dec 7th).
The December report[1] says... reports are due here by the first day
of the month
And the reporting schedule[2] says... should have their reports ready
by no later than the second Wednesday of that month (Wed, Dec
On 2 December 2011 13:11, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
Marvin says... supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date
(Wed, Dec 7th).
That's Incubator Marvin, who requires podlings to provide an extra week's notice
The December report[1] says... reports are due here by the
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:33 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 December 2011 13:11, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
Marvin says... supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date
(Wed, Dec 7th).
That's Incubator Marvin, who requires podlings to provide an extra week's
notice
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Andrew Savory asav...@apache.org wrote:
...We need to update http://apache.org/foundation/board/reporting and
http://community.apache.org/boardreport.html to reflect this change and to
be consistent with each other. The pages currently disagree on
On Friday, December 2, 2011 7:11:36 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Cannot find KEYS file to verify the sigs.
It's here: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/accumulo/KEYS
The md5 and sha hash files have an unusual format that is unlikely to
be recognised by many automated checkers.
The
On 2 December 2011 13:38, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:33 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 December 2011 13:11, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
Marvin says... supply board reports 2 weeks before the above date
(Wed, Dec 7th).
That's
On 2 December 2011 14:12, Billie J Rinaldi billie.j.rina...@ugov.gov wrote:
On Friday, December 2, 2011 7:11:36 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Cannot find KEYS file to verify the sigs.
It's here: http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/accumulo/KEYS
Thanks, please include the link in future
Hello Incubator!
WANdisco would like to propose the inclusion of a new project, Apache
Bloodhound, to the Incubator. The proposal has been posted to the
wiki[1], and is also included below. We've privately discussed this
project with a number of individuals, but would now like to get the
so this is basically Trac ++ and a fork of Trac ?
Or is it a completely rewritten new approach?
just curious :)
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Hyrum K Wright hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Ian Wild ian.w...@wandisco.com; Greg Stein
On 1 December 2011 23:24, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
sebb wrote:
OK?
Wow, thanks for that effort. Please do.
Now done.
Had to make minor tweaks for readability.
If there are any complaints with my changes, please raise ASAP so they
can be fixed.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
so this is basically Trac ++ and a fork of Trac ?
Pretty much. It's Trac plus a number of commonly used plugins plus
additional functionality. There's been some discussion about this
with the principles on the Trac
I was a committer at Seam 3 and I'd like to join forces in DeltaSpike
project.
p.s.: Struberg instructed me to send an email to
general@incubator.apache.org,
Am I doing it right?
Best Regards,
José Rodolfo Freitas
Hi,
I would be glad to be part of Apache DeltaSpike. I have already written some
useful CDI-Extensions for my company open knowledge GmbH and I think we would
contribute them to that project.
Cheers,
Arne
Hi José!
No worries, we don't yet have our mailing lists - this will all come after the
VOTE to accept Deltaspike as incubation.
I know, you (me too) are all eager to finally start hacking, but there is still
a week to hold your feet still ;)
After all the mailing list is setup, we'll ping
Our 72 hour window has passed. So, I'm calling this IP CLEARANCE complete.
Thanks!
--kevan
On Nov 29, 2011, at 5:09 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
The Apache Geronimo project has received a contribution which
On Dec 2, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
So I hope it's clear why it's frustrating to
have this rule suddenly pop up when it's apparently not enforced in
the majority of cases (and then to be asked to go and open JIRAs for
each of these projects on top of it).
This requirement is
SO, IIUIC, the first step is to import TRAC, and we will have
primarily a BSD codebase as the main body of code?
Does this mean that all BSD notices in source files must live in ASF
repository for all eternity, assuming that we are allowed to
sublicense into ALv2 (which I think is no problem)?
And
24 matches
Mail list logo
