Hi Nial!
First, thanks for the review!
Regarding the asc. This is a known Maven side-effect. It's not beautiful but
doesn't hurt.
Ad the Incubation disclaimer notice.
Thanks for the pointer!
Actually our webpage and documentation aren'tdone yet, but we will make sure to
include the
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:06 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 February 2012 01:44, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
A small but annoying nit: you've gone mad signing and creating
AFAIK, this is a known bug with Nexus and/or Maven.
I know the problem with .asc.md5 and
On 2/8/12 11:41 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:06 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 February 2012 01:44, Niall Pembertonniall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
A small but annoying nit: you've gone mad signing and creating
AFAIK, this is a known bug with Nexus and/or
On 20/01/12 06:46, Eric Yang wrote:
Still missing one IPMC vote. Could someone help out?
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
The Jena PPMC has voted to release
Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote
for this release.
== Overview
This will be the second incubator release for by Jena; it's the first
Apache release for the TDB module.
Jena is
Hi...
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
wrote:
Is this a discussion thread or a vote thread? If it is a vote thread
please restart it with [VOTE]. If you want to discuss whether
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there has been a [VOTE], [4], which formally
discussed the graduation to a TLP project. Result
+1 (binding). Good luck guys!
Cheers,
Chris
On Feb 8, 2012, at 6:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past
+1
regards,
gerhard
2012/2/8 Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there has been a
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi...
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
wrote:
Is this a discussion thread or a vote thread? If
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org wrote:
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there has been a
Hi all,
Tony, thanks for your explanation.
@Incubator PMC:
The topic is Project ready to comply with ASF mirroring guidelines from the
Incubation Policy:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Graduating+from+the+Incubator
It's only a SHALL task, but to me it even sounds
+1 (binding)
Ralph
On Feb 8, 2012, at 6:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there has been a
+1 (binding)
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: bval-...@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 3:39 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Apache BVal as a TLP
Hi...
It has been discussed,
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org wrote:
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there has been a
+1
david jencks
On Feb 8, 2012, at 6:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there has been a
+1, good luck!
Ate
On 02/08/2012 03:39 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there has been a
+1 (binding)
Tommaso
2012/2/8 Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there has been a [VOTE],
+1
--kevan
On Feb 8, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there has been a [VOTE],
Hi,
The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged
NPanday and Zeta Components that have still not reported (both also
missed their previous
Nice job Jukka. For me the biggest uptick from Jan was the mentor
participation in the sign-offs, clearly people are taking more time
reading these reports now.
The single-signoff or non-signoff projects are an area of concern
should a pattern emerge. Perhaps we need to take a closer look at
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged
NPanday and
Hi Joe,
On Feb 8, 2012, at 6:42 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Anybody know what the holdup is for Amber regarding IP Clearance?
I think [0] summarizes it pretty well
Regards
Antonio
[0] http://amber.markmail.org/message/yrcy376p5cmvxv5q
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged
NPanday and
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged
NPanday and
Thanks Jukka, a fair exaltation of the projects I'm involved with.
Single sign off should not be a concern. There are a couple of projects
where, for example, I have participated in report composition but have not
signed off. Only one mentor is required to sign off.
Sent from my mobile device,
Let's reset expectations then so that every
mentor is expected to sign-off on reports.
That way we have a better way of surveying
whether or not a podling is getting it's
share of active participation from mentors.
From: Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
From: Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: February report review
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The podling reports this
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
I don't mean this to sound like a yes, but, but you have identified
12 podlings that aren't new and aren't ready to graduate. Are there
active plans to address the top issue
- Original Message -
From: Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: February report review
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some
Hi,
On Wednesday, February 8, 2012, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
wrote:
From: Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
P.S. This may very well piss off four people, but have you
On 8 February 2012 10:41, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:06 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 February 2012 01:44, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
A small but annoying nit: you've gone mad signing and creating
AFAIK, this is a
- Original Message -
From: Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: February report review
Hi,
On Wednesday, February 8, 2012, Joe Schaefer
Jukka,
I'd love to see you step up, even if only for a short period alongside
Noel, or as chair.
As I've repeated many times I'm keen to work with the IPMC to find the
right setup between here and ComDev. That will take a little time. I agree
that the approach you are taking here is a good one.
Hi,
After consideration and some convincing (thanks!), I've decided to
throw also my hat into the ring as a candidate to be the next chairman
of the IPMC.
I believe in that role I could be more effective in focusing more of
our collective attention at where I think it would do most good - at
the
I already mentioned that I would have nominated you, and so I am
delighted to read your message. It will be very difficult to choose
between all these strong candidates.
Cheers
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
After consideration and some
I am happy to step out of the way for Jukka. He was clever enough to
stay out of the email s*** storm, and that alone, in my mind, renders
him most qualified.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
I already mentioned that I would have nominated you, and
+1
Niall
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din mn...@apache.org wrote:
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: February report review
40 matches
Mail list logo
