Re: [DISCUSS] Druid incubation proposal

+1 - glad to see Druid finally (hopefully) landing here! On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:57 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen < henn...@schmiedehausen.org> wrote: > Woot! > > +1 for druid incubation. > > -h > > > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Gian Merlino wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

+1 ! On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Cool. > > +1 > > > On Nov 3, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > > > Please find below a proposal for a new Incubator podling named Apache > > RocketMQ, a fast, low latency, reliable,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Annotator

+1 from me! On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:23 AM Daniel Gruno wrote: > Obviously a binding +1 from me :) > > With regards, > Daniel. > > On 08/08/2016 09:41 PM, Benjamin Young wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > Thanks for everyone who's contributed to the discussion around the >

Re: Apache Annotator needs you to mentor! ;)

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Benjamin Young wrote: > Hi all! > > I'd very much like to un-log-jam the Annotator Proposal which I submitted > back in late May-hence the new thread. ;) > > AFAIK, we only need one more Mentor to get things rolling. Two of our > committers

Re: [VOTE]: Graduate Apache jclouds as an Apache Top Level Project

And a belated +1, not that it needs the extra vote, but jclouds functions great! On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:56 AM, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote: On Sep 23, 2013, at 2:57 PM, Andrew Bayer andrew.ba...@gmail.com wrote: Reminder - it'd be great to get more eyes and make sure we're not

Re: [PROPOSAL] Aurora for Incubation

Aurora is aimed at long-running stateless services (like app servers)? -Brian On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Dave Lester d...@ischool.berkeley.eduwrote: Hi All, We're pleased to share a draft ASF incubation proposal for Aurora, a service scheduler used to schedule jobs onto Apache Mesos

Re: [VOTE] Accept jclouds into the Apache Incubator

* Matt Stephenson, Google * Everett Toews, Rackspace == Sponsors == === Champion === * Brian McCallister, Apache Software Foundation === Mentors === * Brian McCallister, Apache Software Foundation * Tom White, Apache Software Foundation * Henning Schmiedehausen, Apache Software

Might I have permission to edit the wiki (add a page)?

BrianMcCallister Thanks! -Brian

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.10.0-incubating (RC2)

+1 On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Benjamin Hindman b...@berkeley.eduwrote: Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos (incubating) version 0.10.0. This will be the second incubator release for Mesos in Apache. The candidate for Mesos 0.10.0-incubating release is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating (RC5)

+1 swept for licensing and general organization of everything :-) On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matei Zaharia ma...@eecs.berkeley.edu wrote: +1 Tested it on Mac OS X, seems to work fine. Matei On Apr 19, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Benjamin Hindman wrote: Please vote on releasing the following

CloudStack?

I don't remember seeing anything about a CloudStack project, is there something I missed? http://www.citrix.com/English/NE/news/news.asp?newsID=2323072 -Brian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Propose Howl as an Apache Incubator project

The proposal looks fine, but the name collides with http://howl.ow2.org/ -Brian On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Alan Gates ga...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: I would like to propose Howl as an Apache Incubator project.  Howl is a table and storage management service for data created using Apache

Re: [PROPOSAL] Mesos Project

=  * Ali Ghodsi (UC Berkeley / Swedish Institute of Computer Science)  * Benjamin Hindman (UC Berkeley)  * Andy Konwinski (UC Berkeley)  * Matei Zaharia (UC Berkeley) = Sponsors = == Champion == Tom White == Nominated Mentors ==  * Dhruba Borthakur  * Brian McCallister  * Tom White

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

+1 On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: +1 (binding ) sent from my Android phone Am 06.05.2010 07:57 schrieb Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com: +1 --Gurkan From: Simone Gianni simo...@apache.org To:

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Cassandra to an Apache TLP

+1 (slightly late, but I have a great excuse!) On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) Good luck. --kevan On Jan 28, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Eric Evans wrote: Greetings, We took the feedback from the earlier discussion[1] here and added our

Re: [Discuss] Apache Shindig as a TLP

Big +1 On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Vincent Siveton vsive...@apache.org wrote: Hi folks FYI, the Shindig community has successfully voted for graduation [1]. If no objection on the charter or other, I will start a formal acceptance vote soon. Cheers, Vincent [1]

Re: [Proposal][Vote] Traffic Server

+1 On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Leif Hedstroml...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Good evening, As you know, we've been preparing our proposal to submit Traffic Server to the Incubator for a few weeks now. With the help from our champion (thanks Doug!), and the entire Incubator community, it's my

Etch?

What ever happened to Etch? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cassandra into the Incubator

/repos/asf/incubator/cassandra== Issue Tracking == * JIRA Cassandra = Sponsors = == Champion == * Brian McCallister== Mentors == * Torsten Curdt* Brian McCallister * Matthieu Riou * Ian Holsman == Sponsoring Entity == * Incubator

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cassandra into the Incubator

, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote: I consider this to be a high-risk project, and agree with Martjin's concerns, but do not consider this a bar to entering incubation. The *reason* Cassandra wants to enter incubation is to address these weaknesses. +1 -Brian On Tue

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cassandra into the Incubator

On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote: I'd like to see some plan on dealing with the fork/community stuff. We *know* it is a problem, and I'd like to see how this is being addressed in the proposal. In my opinion that is the crux to this proposal.

Re: Cassandra Incubator Proposal

I am expecting to be a mentor. On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Matthieu Riou matthieu.r...@gmail.com wrote: If you need one more, you can count me in. Cheers, Matthieu On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:38 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote: Ian Holsman wrote: I'll be a mentor.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate CouchDB as TLP (Was: Re: Asking for Feedback: CouchDB Graduation)

+1 On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Jan Lehnardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Incubator General List, dear IPMC, thank you all for your comments on whether CouchDB should graduate from the Incubator to a top level project. I think we have your support. On behalf of the Apache CouchDB PPMC I

Re: [PROPOSAL] ESME - The Enterprise Social Messaging Experiment

Sweet, I'll +1 it and probably use it :-) On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Darren Hague [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to propose ESME as a project for the Apache Incubator. Enterprise Social Messaging Experiment (ESME) is a secure and highly scalable microsharing and micromessaging

Re: Apache Shindig Board Reports ?

Good catch, thank you! I just added us to the third group (ie, the March group). We'll need to be good incubatorlings and probably do our first three months of reporting a bit late :-) -Brian On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just trying to help with

Re: Subversion vs other source control systems

FWIW, I quite like both git and mercurial, both give me a better workflow than subversion for a lot of things I work on. Offline commits, local branches, and sane merging are *huge*. The approach to distributed repos is also very nice for folks who do want to maintain a fork elsewhere (forking

Re: [VOTE] Accept CouchDB for incubation

+1 On Sat, Feb 9, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors. Now it is time to

Re: [VOTE] as to Thrift Proposal

+1 -Brian On Thu, Feb 7, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 23, 2008 9:07 PM, Mark Slee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We've just posted the Apache Incubator proposal for Thrift onto the Wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ThriftProposal +1 -Yonik

Re: [DISCUSS] CouchDB incubator project

+1 -- I am very excited to see this and think it will be good for CouchDB. -Brian On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The original source for this proposal can be found at http://www.couchdbwiki.com/index.php?title=Apache_Incubator_Proposal and a current

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Shindig for Incubation

I've filed infra tickets for Shindig tuff to be set up :-) On Dec 3, 2007, at 1:33 PM, Brian McCallister wrote: +1: 25 0: 1 -1: 0 Looks like it passed! Woo hoo! On Nov 28, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Brian McCallister wrote: This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007. [ ] +1 Accept Shindig

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Shindig for Incubation

+1: 25 0: 1 -1: 0 Looks like it passed! Woo hoo! On Nov 28, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Brian McCallister wrote: This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007. [ ] +1 Accept Shindig for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason : = Abstract = Shindig will develop

Re: [PROPOSAL] Shindig, an OpenSocial Container

- Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, November 9, 2007 1:03:49 PM Subject: [PROPOSAL] Shindig, an OpenSocial Container Shindig Proposal -- = Abstract = Shindig will develop the container and backend

[VOTE] Accept Shindig for Incubation

lists A subversion repository A JIRA issue tracker = Initial Committers = Andy Smith (Google) Brian McCallister (Ning) Brian Stoler(Google) Cassie Doll (Google) Dan Bentley (Google) Dan Farino (MySpace) David Glazer

Re: [VOTE] Accept Shindig for Incubation

+1 from me as well :-) On Nov 28, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Brian McCallister wrote: This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007. [ ] +1 Accept Shindig for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason : = Abstract = Shindig will develop a container and backend

Re: [PROPOSAL] Shindig, an OpenSocial Container

Wow, really happy at the positive response. I'm on my way to ATL in the morning, and am halfway healthy again, so will try to pull out some code during hackathon. -Brian On Nov 9, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Brian McCallister wrote: Shindig Proposal -- = Abstract = Shindig will develop

Re: [PROPOSAL] Shindig, an OpenSocial Container

On Nov 9, 2007, at 1:34 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote: Brian McCallister wrote: Shindig Proposal A big +1, and I'd happily be a mentor. Thank you! We'll take you up on that :-) -Brian Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez - http://bluxte.net

[PROPOSAL] Shindig, an OpenSocial Container

A subversion repository A JIRA issue tracker = Initial Committers = Thomas Baker[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thomas Dudziak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Martin Traverso [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Sponsors

Re: [PROPOSAL] Shindig, an OpenSocial Container

On Nov 9, 2007, at 11:47 AM, Leo Simons wrote: Can we see a code dump of the stuff you'll be donating? As soon as possible :-) I am home with a nasty fever today so... blech. We should have the ning-specific stuff gutted out by ApacheCon at least! -Brian

Re: [VOTE] accept Pig into Incubator

+1 -Brian On Sep 25, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the proposed Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this project, which bodes well for its ability to build a diverse developer community.

Re: Incubator Proposal: SPL

On Sep 17, 2007, at 5:57 AM, David L Kaminsky wrote: Tomcat - We're open to suggestions regarding the order in which we add bindings to APIs, and doing such bindings isn't terribly hard. If Tomcat is particularly critical as an early demonstration, we can add that to the

Re: Incubator Proposal: Pig

+1 -- I'd offer to help as much as I can, but I know how little that is right now :-( Definitely support (and will probably use at least ;-) -Brian On Sep 18, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote: Hi, Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal below. The

Re: [VOTE] Retire Heraldry from incubation

+1 -Brian On Jun 1, 2007, at 2:15 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote: This is a vote to move the Heraldry project from active incubation to 'retired' status. Earlier this year the Heraldry project was reorganized in order to make another attempt at incubating an OpenID project. Unfortunately, the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate OpenJPA to a Top Level Project

+1 Good folks, good community, good code! -Brian On May 8, 2007, at 10:45 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: Dear Incubator, The OpenJPA podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider its graduation to a Top Level Project. Please vote on recommending the attached draft board resolution.

Re: Status of the Wadi project?

I think wadi withdrew from incubation. It seems alive here: http:// wadi.codehaus.org/ ? -Brian On Apr 15, 2007, at 2:09 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, I cross-referenced http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule against http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ and noticed that the

Re: WANTED: Another Mentor for QPid

On Apr 10, 2007, at 10:58 PM, Brian McCallister wrote: If someone can step up to help OpenJPA I will trade off :-) I haven't been a fantastic mentor for OpenJPA, anyway :-( (Not trying to ditch OpenJPA, just trying to open up options :-) -Brian

Re: WANTED: Another Mentor for QPid

If someone can step up to help OpenJPA I will trade off :-) I haven't been a fantastic mentor for OpenJPA, anyway :-( -Brian On Apr 10, 2007, at 7:46 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: I am informed that QPid has two Mentors. Would someone please volunteer to act as a third? QPid is an

Re: [vote] mod_wombat ip clearance

On Feb 15, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Brian McCallister wrote: search for if applicable Using the search available here ( http://www.uspto.gov/main/ trademarks.htm ) I found nothing which looks infringing. There are a number of wombat trademarks around, but the only one related to software

IP Clearance and Lazy Consensus

On Feb 14, 2007, at 6:00 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: This is a lazy-consensus approval vote. Huh? These types of things should require activing voting, not lazy-consensus. Otherwise the Incubator is worthless. I am just quoting from the IP Clearance docs: Fourth paragraph (if you count the

[vote] mod_wombat ip clearance

The last code grant for the mod_wombat codebase ( http:// incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/httpd-wombat.html ) has been recorded and I would like to move forward with the import. Code grants and CLA's have been recorded from each person who has contributed code. This is a lazy-consensus

Re: [vote] mod_wombat ip clearance

+1 From me :-) -Brian On Feb 13, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Brian McCallister wrote: The last code grant for the mod_wombat codebase ( http:// incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/httpd-wombat.html ) has been recorded and I would like to move forward with the import. Code grants and CLA's have been

Re: [VOTE] Roller graduation

+1 and about time :-) -Brian On Feb 6, 2007, at 7:07 AM, Dave wrote: OK, let's try this again. The Roller community believes that Roller is ready for graduation, as evidenced by this vote: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-roller-dev/ 200702.mbox/browser We would like to

Re: [VOTE] Felix Graduation

+1 -Brian On Jan 16, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote: The Felix community feels that we are ready for graduation, as indicated by the following community vote to request graduation: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-felix-dev/ 200612.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] We

[result] ActiveMQ Graduation

Vote passes! I'll forward the resolution to the board :-) +1: [ Henri Yandell Alex Karasulu James Strachan Davanum Srinivas Paul Fremantle Dain Sundstrom Brian McCallister Robert Burrell Donkin David Blevins Jason

Re: [vote] ActiveMQ Graduation

Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Rob Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] * David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [vote] ActiveMQ Graduation

+1 -Brian On Jan 8, 2007, at 5:20 PM, Brian McCallister wrote: ActiveMQ would like to move to graduate to a top level project, and that the proposal at the end of this email be presented to the board for consideration at the next meeting. Status File: http://incubator.apache.org/projects

[vote] ActiveMQ Graduation

ActiveMQ PMC: Alan Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rob Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL

Wombat IP Clearance

The Apache HTTPD project has decided (1) to import the wombat codebase (2) and I have filled out all but one part of the ip clearance form. The remaining part is the actual transfer of copyright/assignment/etc. What form is correct for filling this out? -Brian 1)

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid M1

On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:27 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote: On 12/6/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Concern: Was there any resolution on the AMQP licensing terms (1) in relation to making releases? I think it is okay, but how it fits into the current draft guidelines (2) I am unsure. I

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid M1

Concern: Was there any resolution on the AMQP licensing terms (1) in relation to making releases? I think it is okay, but how it fits into the current draft guidelines (2) I am unsure. I think Cliff voted for this, so I suspect it is okay. Just want to make sure :-) Nit: I am unable to

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Cayenne to TLP status (pending board approval)

+1 I have been watching the Cayenne goings-ons and am very impressed. -Brian On Dec 1, 2006, at 7:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: Apache Cayenne community just voted to request graduation from the Incubator as a TLP [1]. The text of the proposed board resolution (adopted from iBatis

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ CPP 1.0

+1 though I'd consider making the configure script +x in the future. -Brian On Nov 14, 2006, at 6:30 PM, Nathan Mittler wrote: The ActiveMQ community has voted on the release of ActiveMQ CPP 1.0 with a total of 6 +1's. The source bundle for the release candidate can be found here:

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

+1 -Brian On Sep 30, 2006, at 9:09 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: Cayenne community has voted and approved 2.0.1 release of Cayenne. This release marks a major milestone in Cayenne incubation as we've fully resolved all IP issues and got rid of incompatible license dependencies. Now we would

Re: Proposal for a new incubation project: Unstructured Information Management Architecture - UIMA

On Aug 25, 2006, at 4:07 AM, Leo Simons wrote: What does it *do*? I believe it is basically a big, pluggable, harness for analyzing and annotating streams of arbitrary data, if this is the same thing I talked with a bunch of folks about (including Martin, I believe) a couple years ago

Re: Proposal for a new incubation project: Unstructured Information Management Architecture - UIMA

On Aug 25, 2006, at 11:11 AM, Brian McCallister wrote: (including Martin, I believe) s/Martin/Marshall/g Doh! Sorry :-) -Brian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] approve the 4.0.2 release of ActiveMQ

Rob Davies +1 Guillaume Nodet +1 Alan D. Cabrera +1 Aaron Mulder +1 Brian McCallister We also had 1 non ppmc +1: +1 Kevan Miller Release tarball: http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.2-RC3/ maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/ Releases section of the Incubation Policy

Re: Forming an ActiveMQ PPMC

On Aug 16, 2006, at 12:32 AM, James Strachan wrote: On 8/16/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The ActiveMQ committers have decided to aim for TLP status (1), as such we need to get a PPMC in place. Thus far we have been working under a committer votes all count style (really

Re: Glasgow - new name proposal

AMQPD -Brian On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: How about Qpid? It could mean Queuing Protocol for Information Delivery or something like that. Carl Trieloff wrote: +1 for Kyma easy to say, read and use in code. Archit Shah wrote: More name ideas for Glasgow (and maybe

Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator

-1 I think that this project is premature until the spec is in an open, inclusive process or at an acceptable standards body with compatible licensing terms. I would embrace this project were it so. The project is supposed to be implementations of a standard protocol but the protocol in

Re: Blaze and Openness of Standards (was Re: [Proposal] Blaze)

On Aug 1, 2006, at 1:47 AM, Gordon Sim wrote: The current working group is open to new members and is eager for feedback from anyone. Where are the archives of the discussions that have gotten it this far so I can understand what is driving the process and be able to contribute? What

Re: Blaze and Openness of Standards (was Re: [Proposal] Blaze)

On Aug 1, 2006, at 9:36 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote: Brian, Just as in JCP, OASIS or W3C the real work happens on private channels, that said we are in the process of creating public pages, from which to link user and feedback lists for anyone to read, access and interact with the working

Re: Blaze and Openness of Standards (was Re: [Proposal] Blaze)

On Aug 1, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote: Could you clarify whether you are asking if the Glasgow project could continue in a different direction from the spec, or whether the spec, itself, could be changed/forked and distributed by the ASF? If something were to happen to cause

Re: Blaze and Openness of Standards (was Re: [Proposal] Blaze)

On Jul 29, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote: Does anyone have any further concerns about this proposal? snip / - There was also the question about how the AMQP specification will be handled and licensed. I started this thread with my feelings about that aspect (short version: it looks

Re: [PROPOSAL] Incubate Wicket

+0 (I'd love to see it happen, but don't expect to be able to contribute). Nice folks, and anything with Upayavira, Sylvain, and Alex involved is destined to conquer the world anyway :-) -Brian On Jul 26, 2006, at 8:54 AM, Upayavira wrote: The Wicket developers

Re: [Proposal] Blaze

On Jul 20, 2006, at 7:12 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 22:33 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote: Carl Trieloff wrote: Sahan, Thank you for your interest, do you mind if we do a brief call (or email...or discuss right here on the list -- whatever your preference) to

Re: [Proposal] Blaze

On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Ian Holsman wrote: if blaze's goal is to create a standardized widely available and interoperable messaging solution (you forgot enterprise class) why is it creating a new one, and not using JMS ? Blaze's goal (AMQP) is to provide multple

Re: [doc] IRC guidelines (was Re: Extensible Ajax Platform (XAP) Project Update)

On Jul 11, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote: IRC can be used by a podling to bring new people up to speed (e.g. QA between available committers and interested users/contributors), although such sessions should be archived and made available to those not able to attend. However, using

Re: Renaming Heraldry

Just my 2 cents: I rather liked the name Heraldry as well -- thought it was one of the more appropriate, and evocative, around =) -Brian On Jul 1, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On 6/30/06, Matt Pelletier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For what it's worth, I don't have an issue with

Re: [VOTE] approve the 4.0.1 release of ActiveMQ

] Vote result: The VOTE has passed with 9 ppmc +1's and no -1s. +1 Hiram Chirino +1 Alan D. Cabrera +1 Adrian Co +1 Brian McCallister +1 Jonas Lim +1 Bruce Snyder +1 Fritz Oconer +1 James Strachan +1 Rob Davies Release tarball: http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.1-RC1

Re: [Proposal] Jini Project

On Jun 19, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Jim Hurley wrote: This proposal seeks to create a project within the Apache Software Foundation to continue the development and advancement of Jini technology. It has broad backing from the Jini Community, and includes core developers from Sun Microsystems

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release (new binary)

+1 -Brian On Jun 5, 2006, at 7:46 AM, James Strachan wrote: We ended up recutting the binary of the 4.0 release of ActiveMQ to address a few issues brought up in the Incubator PMC vote; I'd just like to call another vote to explicitly approve the new binary distro to avoid confusion (as most

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release

+1 -Brian On May 26, 2006, at 5:11 AM, James Strachan wrote: In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the ActiveMQ community has voted on and approved the 4.0 release binary. We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to perform the release.

Re: XAP (Extensible Ajax Platform) Proposal

On May 9, 2006, at 8:56 PM, Coach Wei wrote: Has anyone had a chance to look at this proposal? I realize there have been a few other threads on this list in the last week, but I'd really be interested in getting any feedback. Off topic of the proposal -- how is scripting a UI in XML

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenJPA as an Incubator Podling

+1 -Brian On Mar 19, 2006, at 5:33 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial version can be found here http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1 week until

Re: Incubation Process and PPMCs

On Mar 14, 2006, at 9:51 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote: And continuning the discussion from the OpenJPA proposal thread, do the other 27 - 15 = 12 people on the proposal get moved into non-committer status? Speaking as one of those twelve, I'd greatly appreciate not being removed just because I am

Re: [VOTE] accept Cayenne into incubator

On Mar 2, 2006, at 6:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: Sorry, this is confusion on my end. I will change the Sponsor to DB, but is this consistent with the fact that we have no final decision on how Cayenne will graduate from the incubator (as TLP or DB subproject)? You cannot actually do

Re: Cayenne ASF Proposal

On Feb 28, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Thomas Dudziak wrote: Though it wasn't posted to the PMC list (I only saw it because of the announcement on the incubator list). Erg, could have sworn I CC'ed the pmc list once discussions heated up. My apologies! -Brian

Re: Cayenne ASF Proposal

) would like to join Apache. We wrote a proposal draft that can be viewed here: http://objectstyle.org/confluence/display/CAY/ASF+Proposal Brian McCallister volunteered to help us as a mentor. And now we need a Sponsor. I understand that for TLP a sponsor must be either Incubator PMC or the ASF

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve the 4.0-M4 release of ActiveMQ

+1 -Brian On Feb 17, 2006, at 10:09 AM, James Strachan wrote: In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the ActiveMQ community has voted on and approved a proposal to release the 2nd candidate of the 4.0-M4 release. We would now like to request the permission of the

Re: [VOTE] approve a milestone release of ActiveMQ?

+1 On Jan 30, 2006, at 12:06 AM, James Strachan wrote: On the developer list the committers voted to create a milestone release of ActiveMQ... http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-activemq-dev/ 200512.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] then the committers voted to approve the distro

Removing Axion Resources

The DB PMC would like to ask that the Axion incubation resources be removed and that Axion no longer be considered in incubation. -Brian McCallister - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail

Re: [VOTE] Changes to Incubator process(es)

On Jan 11, 2006, at 6:28 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: [ -1 ] - Any proposal should hit [EMAIL PROTECTED] first, No PR before that. [ -1 ] - Any PR should be vetted by PRC, No Excuses. If this includes blogging about it (which recently was an issue) then it won't work, regardless of what

Re: [VOTE] accept Solr into incubator

+0 (would be +1 but I am trying not to +1 anything which I cannot commit time to help with) I will use it, though =) -Brian On Jan 10, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, +1 from me. Yoav On 1/10/06, Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is as clear as day: +1. Otis

Re: [PROPOSAL] Solr

I know of at least half a dozen private implementations of exactly this. I definitely would like to see some common cause oon it. Will read proposal in more detail tomorrow morning! -Brian On Jan 3, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: Hello Incubator PMC folks, I would like to propose a

JDO2 Snapshots

Is it okay for the (incubating) jdo project to post snapshots to the maven repository at ibiblio via the cvs.apache.org repo? The only catch is figuring a good way to label it as in incubation. One option is to include it the artifact id, so it would be something like:

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Derby as sub-project of Apache DB

On Jul 26, 2005, at 11:21 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: So what happens now? :-) Logistical details that come to mind are: * adding Derby committers to the DB PMC - I assume a vote on who to add takes place on the DB PMC list, is this in progess? yes. Cannot comment on the rest =) *

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Derby as sub-project of Apache DB

+1 (derby ppmc and db pmc hats on) -Brian On Jul 20, 2005, at 8:40 PM, Daniel John Debrunner wrote: Noel said that rather than hassling the Incubator PMC members for release approval, we should just graduate! So please vote on graduating Derby to a sub-project of Apache DB. The developer

Re: [VOTE] Derby 10.1 incubating release

+1 (non-binding) -Brian On Jul 16, 2005, at 9:39 AM, Andrew McIntyre wrote: Hello Incubator, On behalf of the Derby development community, I'd like to request permission to post the files you can find here: http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/derby_10.1/ as an incubating release on the

Re: Proposal for STDCXX

Big +1 (non-binding) -Brian On May 13, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Heidi Buelow wrote: Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library Submission date: 12 May 2005, Tim Triemstra, Heidi Buelow (TimT @ RogueWave dot-com, Buelow @ RogueWave dot-com) (0) rationale The goal of the Apache C++

[OT] Re: [VOTE] Graduate Derby from the incubator

On Apr 22, 2005, at 2:16 PM, Daniel John Debrunner wrote: Pity my Derby internals proposal was rejected by Apachecon Europe :-) Would you consider doing it as a BOF if you will be there? I would like to attend it! -Brian - To

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Derby from the incubator

3, 2005, at 11:51 AM, Brian McCallister wrote: On Apr 3, 2005, at 11:02 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: At least one person from the DB PMC has voted in favour of graduation, which I hope means that the project understands the issues of assuming oversight and feels comfortable doing so. Having

  1   2   >