Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Mnemonic project from Incubator

+1 Graduate Apache Mnemonic from the Incubator Regards, Patrick On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: > Hello IPMC and everyone, > > The Mnemonic community has voted on its Dev list to graduate, The vote > passed with > 14 +1s (including +9s from the

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrating to the New Incubator Website

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 5:35 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > I'd like to start the process to move forward on a new incubator website. > Based on discussions in the past on list, I wanted to do the following: > > - Roll out a new technology stack + repository > - Leave

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating [rc1]

+1 xsum/sig verified, RAT ran clean, checklist looks ok. Was able to build/test/install the source. lgtm. Patrick On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: > Hello incubator PMCs, > > The Apache Mnemonic community PPMCs and developers have voted and > approved

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating [rc2] (Revised)

Hi Gary. You want to summarize all the votes, including the ones on the project's dev list, here - I (and others) had voted on the dev list thread already. Patrick On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Gary wrote: > Hi all, > > > After being open for over 72 hours, the vote for

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating [rc2] (Revised)

I had to use mvn -pl '!mnemonic-memory-services/mnemonic-nvml-vmem-service,!mnemonic-memory-services/mnemonic-pmalloc-service' clean install on my mac (guess I didn't have mvem and pmalloc installed?) Patrick On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: >

Re: Final draft of the Incubator Board Report - April 2016

Hey there, just back from vacation and getting caught up. Thanks for the reminder! Patrick On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Wang, Yanping wrote: > Hi, John > > I think our mentors are busy during the day. > Patrick was on vacation last week. I'd suggest give them a few

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Mnemonic as an Apache Incubator Podling

This vote has PASSED with the following tallies: +1 Binding total 9 Patrick Hunt Jacques Nadeau Henry Saputra James Taylor Andrew Purtell Chris Nauroth Arvind Prabhakar P. Taylor Goetz Ted Dunning +1 No-binding, total 11 Phillip Rhodes Ramkrishna S Vasudevan Uma Gangumalla Debo Dutta Tsuyoshi

[VOTE] Accept Mnemonic into the Apache Incubator

ra Rao G, Intel * Kai Zheng, Intel * Rakesh Radhakrishnan Potty, Intel * Sean Zhong, Intel * Henry Saputra, Independent * Hao Cheng, Intel === Sponsors === ==== Champion Patrick Hunt ==== Nominated Mentors * Patrick Hunt - Apache IPMC member * Andrew Purtell - Apache IPMC memb

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sentry

he.org> > >* Guoquan Shen <gqs...@apache.org> > >* Hadi Nahari <h...@apache.org> > >* Hao Hao <ha...@apache.org> > >* Jarek Jarcec Cecho <jar...@apache.org> > >* Johnny Zhang <dreamb...@a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Twill-0.7.0-incubating

I already voted on the dev list thread, but here's my +1 again. Patrick On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi IPMCs, > > Please help Twill community to VOTE on release. > > Thank you. > > - Henry > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Justin Mclean

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015, at 08:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > I don't think that's the question on the table. Typically, podlings make > > committers == PPMC members. The reasoning being that the only thing a > > PPMC member

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org > wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > > ...what would the action item the community should take away from > > this? As their mentor I'm not sure

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > > ...If you read the graduation requirements it says nothing about adding > PPMC > > a

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015, at 10:27 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > Joe, has any of this conversation put your mind at ease about the > > podling? > > I'm less concerned than I was, yes. I'm still not in +1 territory. I'm > not

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 4, 2015 10:03 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" <bdelacre...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org&g

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015, at 11:26 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > So you are -1 then. That's fine. But it gets back to my original concern. > > It's artificial. I can go back to the Sentry community and say &q

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:05 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > On Nov 4, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > * I would invite folks with access to go to Sentry's private list and > look over discussions about adding new contributors, and discussions >

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > ...Sentry started with 24 committers/PPMC. It hasn't added any PPMC > members > > since its inception... > > If that's correct I'm

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 04:42 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > > <bdelacre...@apache.org > > > wrote: > > > > &

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

I haven't seen the "quick closing" aside from things like some test cleanups, even then the average was 5 days. I ran the jira report for resolution time and it certainly doesn't seem like jiras are being closed "instantly". Most of these are closed after many (typ. double digit, some tripple)

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

I see this (the release discussion threads you linked) as a semi-mature community that's well aligned. A number of folks responded to the request for discussion and said they were in favor. It was done on the ML in the open. What more do we want? I don't see anyone excluded and I'm sure if there

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 11/02/2015 04:41 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote: > > I think it is a good sign that community is volunteering to do the > release > > work. > > I think the point I'm making is largely being ignored. I'm not seeing > much

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

fwiw it's +9 by my count (24->33). Sentry is security, so by my definition that's pretty good. ;-) Patrick On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > All of our projects are primarily in the recruitment business, so it does > concern > me that a project that's

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

10x to what Chris said, put much better than I could. We all wear multiple hats, can't tell you the number of times I've worn my Apache hat in the office, in some cases to my own detriment there. If I weren't associated with the project at Apache that representation would be missing. So really it

Re: June report prep

aren't inclined to sign off based on some of the issues that have popped up. On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 12:35 PM Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: Hi David, you and Joe have been doing great, I'm afraid I've been distracted with more issues at home/work than usual. I've been concerned

Re: June report prep

and the response (ongoing) from the community we should be able to get things back on track. Thanks, Patrick On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 3:14 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: Ted can you give some concrete examples, because I see some

Re: June report prep

Ted can you give some concrete examples, because I see some good feedback along with folks attempting to address the feedback. Processes updated or re-iterated, etc... I haven't seen any comments like stop the presses till... is addressed and that being ignored. More along the lines of an issue

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry incubating version 1.5.0 (rc0)

+1 - xsum/sig are valid. Rat ran clean. Ran through the release checklist and everything seems fine there. Patrick On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 7:11 PM, gqshen gqs...@apache.org wrote: Hello IPMC We have passed the PPMC vote for Sentry incubator release 1.5.0-rc0 with 3 +1 votes from Prasad

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Twill-0.5.0-incubating

+1. the sig/xsum validate. Rat ran clean and the files all look right to me. Patrick On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: Signature file look good Checksum files looks good NOTICE file looks good LICENSE file look good DISCLAIMER file exist No third

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Twill-0.4.1.-incubating

+1 - xsums/sig verify, RAT ran clean and the appropriate files are there. Note: for some reason the sha512 file is gzip'd (at least it was when I d/l it via chrome), not a text file. However if you un-gzip it the sha512 matches. Patrick On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Henry Saputra

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format (incubating) 2.2.0 RC2

+1 sig/xsum are valid. RAT ran clean and the checklist looks fine to me (license/notice/disclaimer/etc... are all good, etc...) Patrick On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Ryan Blue b...@apache.org wrote: Hi everyone, I'd like to propose a vote to release parquet-format-2.2.0-rc2 as the

Re: Request for mentor assessment

The S4 retirement vote is in progress: http://markmail.org/message/mkxdu6fnzmsybeq2 Patrick On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! I would like to kindly request some assistance from the mentors of the following projects: devicemap, kalumet, s4, wave

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry 1.3.0 incubating rc0

-1. The release artifact seems to be totally wrong to me, I think it was built incorrectly/accidentally, it certainly wasn't built the same way as the 1.2.0 release artifact. Some of the problems: 1) the artifact is 500MB - the previous artifact (1.2.0) was 86k, unless you added tons of test data

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Twill 0.1.0-incubating [rc1]

Incubation status reports and Project setup section). Is it not update enough? Thanks, Terence On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: -1, the release looks good however the status page needs to be updated before you publish this (generally, but specifically see

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Twill 0.1.0-incubating [rc1]

-1, the release looks good however the status page needs to be updated before you publish this (generally, but specifically see the Project Setup section): http://incubator.apache.org/projects/twill.html If you're not familiar with the mechanics of this see:

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

+1 Patrick On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread: http://s.apache.org/aEQ). I'm now calling an official

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.9.0-incubating (rc5)

Hi Patrick, prior to any incubator release you should ensure that your status page is up to date. The Project Setup section in particular: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/spark.html Patrick On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Patrick Wendell pwend...@gmail.com wrote: Please vote on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.9.0-incubating (rc5)

be updated for 2014 * the release artifact (spark-0.9.0-incubating.tgz) is missing the DISCLAIMER file, I see that the text is included in the readme, this is somewhat non-standard but seems fine. Patrick On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: Hi Patrick, prior

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.9.0-incubating (rc5)

The status page is updated and it looks good to me. +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 0.9.0-incubating Patrick On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: -1 due to the status page not being up to date. But otw the sig/xsums looked good, RAT checked out clean

Re: S4 Podling - May need some help

On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: Any updates from the mentors? I reviewed/signedoff on the report. I've commented both in public and in private to the s4 folks that they should consider retirement as an option. I was/am waiting to see what the

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Twill for Incubation

. Alejandro Abdelnur 2. Edward J. Yoon 3. Joe Stein 4. Patrick Hunt 5. Ashish 6. Tom White 7. Andrew Purtell 8. Bernd Fondermann 9. Larry Mccay 10. Seetharam Venkatesh - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general

Re: [VOTE] Accept Twill for Incubation

at apache dot org * Patrick Hunt phunt at apache dot org * Andrei Savu asavu at apache dot org == Sponsoring Entity == We are requesting that the Incubator sponsor this project. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Curator as an Apache Top Level Project

(iocanel) * Patrick Hunt (phunt) * Mahadev Konar (mahadev) * Luciano Resende (lresende) * Enis Söztutar (enis) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Jordan Zimmerman be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Curator

Re: If I were king of the forest

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On May 8, 2013, at 1:09 PM, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote: Sebb is awesome. +1 Patrick - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] S4 0.6.0 Incubating Release Candidate 5

+1 (binding) sig/xsum verify. rat runs clean. I've run through the release checklist and everything seems fine to me. Patrick On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Matthieu Morel mmo...@apache.org wrote: Hello, this is the *fifth* release candidate for Apache S4, version 0.6.0 We fixed 2 blocking

Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Curator 2.0.0-incubating

Hi Jordan, re the voting process see: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote Also the other links to how to release type pages for other incubator projects. It will give you insight into the process and things like templates for emails and

Re: [VOTE] S4 0.6.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Matthieu Morel mmo...@apache.org wrote: Hey there, just back from vacation, hopefully Sebb can weigh in but here's my thinking: We have 2 key questions, which I reproduce below: 1/ about the content of LICENSE and NOTICE, is the following correct? - in the

Re: [VOTE] S4 0.6.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:59 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 27 March 2013 20:57, Matthieu Morel mmo...@apache.org wrote: On Mar 27, 2013, at 21:00 , sebb wrote: On 27 March 2013 19:07, Matthieu Morel mmo...@apache.org wrote: gradle/gradlew scripts to not have the ASL header because this

Re: [VOTE] Accept Curator into the Incubator

. Initial Committers • Jordan Zimmerman (jzimmerman at netflix dot com) • Jay Zarfoss (jzarfoss at netflix dot com) Affiliations • Jordan Zimmerman, Netflix • Jay Zarfoss, Netflix Sponsors Champion • Patrick Hunt Nominated Mentors • Patrick

Re: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator

and others that relying on ZK would appreciate simpler client to ZK. Thanks, Henry On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: So isnt this similar to HCatalog which relying on Hive

Re: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator

. Patrick On 2/26/13 9:40 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: If you think that the right destination for curator is as part of ZK

Re: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hey Pat, On 2/26/13 11:39 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: […snip…] Either: (a) define Curator to be its own separate project/community, with a goal of TLP; or (b) nix Incubation

Re: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator

= == Champion == * Patrick Hunt == Nominated Mentors == * Patrick Hunt * Enis Söztutar * Mahadev Konar == Sponsoring Entity == * Apache Incubator PMC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr

Re: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator

Zimmerman (jzimmerman at netflix dot com) * Jay Zarfoss (jzarfoss at netflix dot com) = Affiliations = * Jordan Zimmerman, Netflix * Jay Zarfoss, Netflix = Sponsors = == Champion == * Patrick Hunt == Nominated Mentors == * Patrick Hunt * Enis Söztutar

Re: Crunch status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of November2012 by MatthiasFriedrich)

I second this. Short of the name search these folks are ready to graduate. Patrick On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Thanks for the report, Crunch! On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote: + The Crunch

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Crunch 0.4.0 (incubating) RC1

+1, sig/xsum validate, code is compiling/installing, I ran through the release checklist and everything checks out. Patrick On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote: +1 RAT tests pass (as do others), checksums sigs match. On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:54 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Helix into Apache Incubator

Zheng (LinkedIn) * Adam Silberstein (Trifacta) * Kapil Surlaker (LinkedIn) * Bob Schulman (LinkedIn) * Swaroop Jagadish (LinkedIn) * Rahul Aggarwal (LinkedIn) * Terence Yim (LinkedIn) * Santiago Perez (LinkedIn) == Sponsors == === Champion === * Patrick Hunt (Apache Member

Re: [PROPOSAL] Helix for the Apache Incubator

) == Sponsors == === Champion === * Patrick Hunt (Apache Member) === Nominated Mentors === * Patrick Hunt (Apache Member) * Mahadev Konar (Apache Member) * Owen O'Malley (Apache Member) === Sponsoring Entity === We are requesting the Incubator to sponsor this project

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Bigtop podling from Apache Incubator

listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Bigtop Project: * Alan Gatesga...@apache.org * Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org * Steve Loughranste...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1

+1. The signature and checksum files all verify for me. I ran through the release checklist and that seems fine. RAT check looked good. license/notice files look valid for both src and bin artifacts. Patrick On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: +1, I

Re: [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1

You need passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 IPMC votes are cast.. afaict so far you have 1 (me). Patrick On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@s4.io wrote: We are missing an IPMC vote for this release and the vote closes today. Can we get an IPMC member to vote, please?

Re: [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1

FYI, you should CC the incubator general list on release votes. I mentioned it on the dev list - the incubator status page for s4 needs to be updated, it's significantly out of date. Patrick On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Matthieu Morel mmo...@apache.org wrote: Hello, this is the first

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept Blur into the Apache Incubator

Blur has been accepted into the incubator with the following vote tally: +1 : 15 (10 binding) -1 : 0 Patrick vote details: Dave Fisher (binding) Bill Graham Tim Williams (binding) Jukka Zitting (binding) Mohammad Nour El-Din (binding) Patrick Hunt (binding) Ashish Paliwal Olivier Lamy (binding

Re: [VOTE] Accept Blur into the Apache Incubator

dot com) * Ryan Gimmy (ryan.gimmy at nearinfinity dot com) * Tim Williams (twilliams at apache dot org) * Patrick Hunt (phunt at apache dot org) * Doug Cutting (cutting at apache dot org) == Affiliations == * Aaron !McCurry, Near Infinity * Scott Leberknight, Near Infinity * Ryan

Re: S4 status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of June2012 by PatrickHunt)

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote: +  1. Still working towards an initial release on Apache with the current +     code (version 0.4 = version 0.3 + checkpointing + bugfixes) Is

Re: ANNOUNCE Apache Oozie 3.2.0 release

Seems that was dropped from the template? it's here on the how to release page: http://incubator.apache.org/oozie/HowToRelease.html On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 6:45 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 June 2012 15:36, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@apache.org wrote: The Apache Oozie team is pleased to

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

Isn't this why we vote. To come to a decision when consensus can't be reached and allow people to move on. Patrick On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote: The graduation requirements say The project is considered to have a diverse community when it is

Re: June reports in two weeks

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: There is currently no shepherd assigned, someone want to volunteer or doesn't it make sense at this point? I'll give a closer look at your upcoming report unless someone beats me to it. I guess you're still busy

Re: June reports in two weeks

Btw, S4 is short a mentor. It would be great if one or two IPMC members could volunteer and help Arun and I with mentorship duties. Regards, Patrick On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: Hi Jukka, I'm also concerned for S4 not having a release and low activity

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: Isn't this why we vote. To come to a decision when consensus can't be reached and allow people to move on. When diversity concerns were raised

Re: [VOTE] Release Oozie 3.2.0-incubating (candidate 1)

+1. sig/xsum verified. The RAT report looks good. I ran through the incubator release checklist and all of the items seem to be covered. I was able to run all of the unit tests successfully. Patrick On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote: Dear Incubator

Re: June reports in two weeks

I've added Crunch to the monthly report for June. There is currently no shepherd assigned, someone want to volunteer or doesn't it make sense at this point? Patrick On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, There's plenty of time still before the

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote: On May 23, 2012, at 10:48 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote: On May 23, 2012, at 10:15 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2012

Re: [VOTE] Accept Crunch into the Apache Incubator

+1 Patrick On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: +1 Regards, Alan On May 23, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Josh Wills wrote: I would like to call a vote for accepting Apache Crunch for incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available

Re: June reports in two weeks

Hi Jukka, I'm also concerned for S4 not having a release and low activity. I pinged them about cutting a release a couple months ago and they said they weren't ready. As for activity there is some mailing list traffic but almost no jira/commits listed in april/may. For Bigtop i've been tracking

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

% on target. Ralph On May 23, 2012, at 7:31 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: Perhaps someone will have some insight on how to gather new contributors that hasn't been tried yet? Jukka's written on this subject multiple times

Re: Policy for new committers to podlings

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: I'm embarrassed to report that I'm feeling a bit foggy on the new committer policy, and a quick tour with google failed to find it on a web page. We're long on pages about initial podling setup, and not so long on

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Perhaps this preso can help a bit:    http://people.apache.org/~rvs/apache-bigtop2.pdf Perfect, thanks! Roman could you post this on the wiki?

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

It's not the job of the incubator to create new rules, but rather to help podlings to graduation while following existing Apache guidelines. It's very clear from http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html that what has been proposed is acceptable under existing Apache rules. Bigtop is building

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: It's not the job of the incubator to create new rules, but rather to help podlings to graduation while following existing Apache guidelines. We aren't

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: On May 4, 2012 2:03 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: ... EOD existing Apache rules/license make no such distinction. Works under the following licenses may be included within Apache products (includes ASL). Can

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.9.0-incubating-rc2

+1, signatures and xsums all look good, rat passed, tests pass. lgtm. On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote: This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.9.0-incubating. It fixes the following issues:

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.9.0-incubating-rc1

-1. junit jar (CPL, cat b) is included in the binary artifact however there is nothing in the notice for this. Patrick On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote: Shoot, yes I meant to include them from the start. Current vote is +1  3  Brock Noland, Jim Donofrio,

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.9.0-incubating-rc1

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: -1. junit jar (CPL, cat b) is included in the binary artifact however there is nothing in the notice for this. Patrick On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote: Shoot, yes I meant to include them

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.1.0-incubating (rc1)

+1, lgtm. sig/xsums are all correct, was able to build/test successfully, rat report was clean. I also ran through the incubator release checklist and everything looks fine. On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote: +1 Verified gpg/md5, unpacking, and startup.

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.3.0-incubating

+1 lgtm. The sig/xsum check out. I was able to build the zk debs successfully on my ubuntu system. I ran through the incubator checklist and everything seems in order. I managed to generate the rat report via mvn apache-rat:check and it checked out. Patrick On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Alan

Re: S4 status (was: Re: Thoughts on Incubator board reports)

+s4-dev@ On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote: Ping, waiting for a response from s4-dev@ folks. Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 16:19:27 +0200: Jukka Zitting wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 14:41:00 +0100: Just pick one from the list

Re: [DISCUSS] - Packages renaming and backward compatibility (was: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator)

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote: The discussion pertains to the presence of com.cloudera packages in the source code of a podling for the sake of backwards compatibility with Cloudera products. Alex this is an incorrect summary of the facts, similar

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.1-incubating

including the jar this time would be OK. Brock On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: +1 sig/xsum are correct, rat is clean, tests all pass. Looks good to me. Note: the archive includes a mrunit jar file (the only jar file) 'mrunit-0.8.1-incubating-hadoop100

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.1-incubating

-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mrunit-dev/201202.mbox/%3CCAFukC%3D4Gie5Yvbyp84QmY%2BtVj9pJ9BMuEv4xeqCSHnamrZX6DQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E Brock On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: me/tom/chris is not sufficient? Or did I miss something? Patrick On Tue, Feb 28, 2012

Re: [DISCUSS] - Packages renaming and backward compatibility (was: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator)

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org Sqoop was ASL licensed and had an open following long before it was accepted

Re: [VOTE] RAT Ready To Graduate As Apache Creadur Top Level Project

+1 (binding) On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: +1 - binding Regards, Alan On Feb 26, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's willingness to govern itself

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote: Cloudera's compatibility issues are not our problem. These packages need to go. Citation needed. Without a written policy to that effect

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Feb 28, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote: I'm not sure

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: I agree that this potentially could be an issue, but whether it's a technical requirement is up to the team who's doing the work. If Apache feels

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Feb 28, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:06 AM

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

Note that API is not just method signatures but includes all aspects of implementation such as class hierarchies, type compatibility, static and non-static state etc. I think that it's good to have binary compatibility with Cloudera's old bindings.   I still don't see why it's a requirement

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Alan D. Cabrera a...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Feb 28, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: We should also give Arvind and the rest of the Sqoop community some indication how to proceed, given the voting period is completed. A concern has been raised

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote: On the other hand, I totally respect that Cloudera's interest to support their customers and provide backword compatibility, but this is *not* the point at all, the point is this *should* not, and even allow me

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) Tommaso 2012/2/24 Arvind Prabhakar arv...@apache.org This is a call for vote to graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator. Sqoop entered Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it

  1   2   >