Hi all,
after 72 hours, the vote for Syncope 1.0.0-RC1-incubating [1] *passes*
with 3 IPMC votes.
+1 (IPMC / binding)
* Olivier Lamy
* Emmanuel Lécharny
* Colm O hEigeartaigh (on syncope-dev ML)
+1 (non binding)
none
0
none
-1
none
Thanks to everyone participating.
I will now copy this
[X] +1 approve (binding)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
2012/5/29 Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org:
I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:
SVN source tag (r1342204):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/syncope/tags/syncope-1.0.0-RC1-incubating/
Maven staging repo:
I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:
SVN source tag (r1342204):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/syncope/tags/syncope-1.0.0-RC1-incubating/
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesyncope-125/
Hi all,
apologize for the lack of participation but I'm in the middle of a
very busy month :S
Is that compatible? Indiana University Extreme! Lab Software License
I think its fine, but I am not very good with that boring stuff:
http://apache.org/legal/3party.html
It is, and looks like other
Hi again,
after a little research:
org.livetribe:livetribe-jsr223:jar:2.0.6
ASL2.0 license, see its parent:
http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/livetribe/livetribe/1.2/livetribe-1.2.pom
org.mybatis:mybatis:jar:3.0.6
ASL2.0
Hi all,
as far as I've understood we are quite in an impasse here: is there any
quick way out?
I've performed some more analysis and I've come to the following findings:
1. XPP3 is pulled in by XStream (syncope-core and syncope-console WAR files)
[INFO] +-
Le 5/16/12 9:45 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :
Hi all,
Hi Francesco
as far as I've understood we are quite in an impasse here: is there any
quick way out?
Thinking twice about the third party components, I came to the
conclusion that we should include the license of those requiring that
On 14/05/2012 20:45, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 5/14/12 6:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
Can you please let me know which license XPP uses? I could not find informatino
in NOTICE and did not find a website
Le 5/15/12 9:31 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :
On 14/05/2012 20:45, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Emmanuel
Lécharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 5/14/12 6:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
Can you please let me know which license XPP uses? I could not
Can you please let me know which license XPP uses? I could not find
informatino in NOTICE and did not find a website which helped me. its
necessary to clarify that as xpp3 is in the war file release. Once you
told
me, I will give my +1
Clearly missing in the NL files.
OK. Guess this
The point is that we don't vote binaries, we vote sources. Generated
binaries are just by-products of the build.
That we distribute binaries is just for convenience.
which does not change anything imho
Now, I do think that we should include into the NL files the licenses for
3rd parties we
Le 5/14/12 1:03 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 12 May 2012 23:59, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 5/12/12 1:42 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 11 May 2012 16:29, Francesco Chicchiriccòilgro...@apache.orgwrote:
I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following artifacts
up
for
On 14/05/2012 01:03, sebb wrote:
On 12 May 2012 23:59, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 5/12/12 1:42 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 11 May 2012 16:29, Francesco Chicchiriccòilgro...@apache.org wrote:
I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following artifacts
up for a
On 14 May 2012 08:47, Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/05/2012 01:03, sebb wrote:
On 12 May 2012 23:59, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 5/12/12 1:42 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 11 May 2012 16:29, Francesco Chicchiriccòilgro...@apache.org wrote:
I've created
Le 5/14/12 4:05 PM, sebb a écrit :
On 14 May 2012 08:47, Francesco Chicchiriccòilgro...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/05/2012 01:03, sebb wrote:
On 12 May 2012 23:59, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 5/12/12 1:42 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 11 May 2012 16:29, Francesco
Can you please let me know which license XPP uses? I could not find
informatino in NOTICE and did not find a website which helped me. its
necessary to clarify that as xpp3 is in the war file release. Once you
told me, I will give my +1
Release looks ok so far.
I have found files like that:
Le 5/14/12 6:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
Can you please let me know which license XPP uses? I could not find
informatino in NOTICE and did not find a website which helped me. its
necessary to clarify that as xpp3 is in the war file release. Once you
told me, I will give my +1
Clearly
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 5/14/12 6:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
Can you please let me know which license XPP uses? I could not find
informatino in NOTICE and did not find a website which helped me. its
necessary to clarify that
On 14 May 2012 19:45, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 5/14/12 6:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
Can you please let me know which license XPP uses? I could not find
informatino in NOTICE and
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:44 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 May 2012 19:45, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 5/14/12 6:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
Can you please let me know
On 12 May 2012 23:59, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 5/12/12 1:42 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 11 May 2012 16:29, Francesco Chicchiriccòilgro...@apache.org wrote:
I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following artifacts
up
for a vote:
SVN source tag (
Le 5/12/12 1:42 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 11 May 2012 16:29, Francesco Chicchiriccòilgro...@apache.org wrote:
I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following artifacts up
for a vote:
SVN source tag ( r1335495):
I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:
SVN source tag ( r1335495):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/syncope/tags/syncope-1.0.0-RC1-incubating/
Maven staging repo:
Le 5/9/12 2:27 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 13:06, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Comments inline
Le 5/8/12 11:05 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccòilgro...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi Sebb,
you can find my replies embedded below.
I am going to send
Le 5/9/12 6:35 PM, sebb a écrit :
On 9 May 2012 07:42, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 5/9/12 2:27 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 13:06, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@gmail.comwrote:
Comments inline
Le 5/8/12 11:05 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco
Hi Sebb,
you can find my replies embedded below.
I am going to send a [CANCEL] reply to this thread, remove Nexus staging
repo and SVN tag, fix everything and start again the release process for
1.0.0-RC1-incubating from scratch.
Regards.
On 07/05/2012 14:47, sebb wrote:
On 7 May 2012
Hi all,
the vote [1] is canceled since the provided release artifacts did not
meet all requirements, as highlighted in the mentioned mail thread by
Sebb.
I am going to delete the staging repository
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesyncope-034/
and the SCM tag
On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Sebb,
you can find my replies embedded below.
I am going to send a [CANCEL] reply to this thread, remove Nexus staging
repo and SVN tag, fix everything and start again the release process for
1.0.0-RC1-incubating from
On 8 May 2012 13:06, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Comments inline
Le 5/8/12 11:05 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccòilgro...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Sebb,
you can find my replies embedded below.
I am going to send a [CANCEL] reply to this thread,
I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:
SVN source tag (r1333797):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/syncope/tags/syncope-1.0.0-RC1-incubating/
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesyncope-034/
On 7 May 2012 10:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org wrote:
I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:
SVN source tag (r1333797):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/syncope/tags/syncope-1.0.0-RC1-incubating/
There must be an
Le 5/7/12 2:47 PM, sebb a écrit :
On 7 May 2012 10:38, Francesco Chicchiriccòilgro...@apache.org wrote:
I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:
SVN source tag (r1333797):
33 matches
Mail list logo
