On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Danny Angus wrote:
| Hi,
| although this question would be more likely to get an accurate answer on the
| tomcat mailing lists: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/idiot.html
"idiot.html" - no less. How _nice_.. What about "ignorant" or some other
not so rude word?
--
Mvh,
End
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Folks,
We're well past the deadline for voting now. At the moment we are
verifying the ballots.
Committers:
If you voted - you should have received a confirmation by now. If all
information is correct - then you do not need to do anything. If you did
not vot
I'm not sure I'm against this idea entirely... Just who is going to pay
for it? VA has massive hardware behind Sourceforge (and its still down
all the damn time). How do you do Apacheforge on far less boxen without
whats left of VC money and probably an IPO?
All of the other issues are little d
> Apache is and has always been selective for a reason: we value
> communities more than software and it takes a lot of energy to build a
> community solid enough to build good enough software to pay back Apache
> for the risk of diluting the brand each time a new effort is added.
The question i
Paul,
That helped me better understand your position. Let me see if I can clarify
mine a little more.
ApacheForge is essentially SourceForce with an Apache flavor. The purpose
of ApacheForge would be to provide a nursery for starting projects licensed
under the Apache License. I like the idea
Paul Hammant wrote:
> Apache create ApacheForge. It has rules on IP and decision making, but
> is completely open to entrants.
-1
Apache is and has always been selective for a reason: we value
communities more than software and it takes a lot of energy to build a
community solid enough to build
Marc,
Apache as is is an Ivory tower. Projects come here infrequently and
Apache license is not a natural or obvious choice for peopel starting
projects elsewhere (typically sourceforge).
Perhaps think of it this way, Apache with in partnership with
sourceforge mounts ApacheForge. Communi
Paul,
I still don't get it. What you've essentially proposed is SourceForge
running on Apache hardware and named ApacheForge. The idea being, I think,
that having 'Apache' in the name lends it some credibility. But you've also
removed all the normal barriers to entry into the Apache community
Marc,
It's a marketing thing.
This is more general than my AltRMI issue.
I think ApacheForge has merit irrespective of what happens to AltRMI.
- Paul
>-1
>
>Since the proposed ApacheForge would have no real connection with Apache
>other than running on Apache hardware I don't really see the val
Daniel,
Yes I guess I would.
Do you hold the purse strings for Apache.org ?
- Paul
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Hammant writes:
>
>>I like the idea of a seperate, but endorsed ApacheForge site. It would
>>give i) Encouragement ii) Independance but also iii) Community. I think
>>it
-1
Since the proposed ApacheForge would have no real connection with Apache
other than running on Apache hardware I don't really see the value. How is
this different from starting a project on SourceForge and building the
community that way? There's nothing stopping anyone from using the Apache
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Hammant writes:
>I like the idea of a seperate, but endorsed ApacheForge site. It would
>give i) Encouragement ii) Independance but also iii) Community. I think
>it is a good and safe solution to what I think is the catch-22 situation
>of trying to get a
Folks,
*Management summary*
Apache create ApacheForge. It has rules on IP and decision making, but
is completely open to entrants.
*Long winded desc*
The Free Software Foundation were peeved that SourceForge forked their
site source internally. So upset in fact they mounted their own site -
Hi,
although this question would be more likely to get an accurate answer on the
tomcat mailing lists: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/idiot.html
You may find that your environment variable JAVA_HOME is not set, how you
set it depends upon what version of windows you are using.
d.
> -Original
Hi,
I am having problem installing Tomcat_4_0.exe on windows.
I keep getting error message ..
Couldn't find a Java Development Kit installed on this computer.Please
download one from http://java.sun.com.
My confusion is that I actually have installed j2sdk and j2sdkee and
even moved them to vario
15 matches
Mail list logo
