We should do the same on Commons at some point. Throw out the ones that
seem dead.
Hen
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i count 4 +1's
the consensus seems to be in favour of removal so that's what i'm going
to do.
i propose to leave retain the number by noting those that h
+1
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core objects, a
JavaBean-style API, or to provide an optional JavaBean wrapper.
doesn't seem very relevant. i think that it'd be simpler just to drop
it.
here's my +1
- robert
--8<---
On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 13:13 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Here is a stab at replacement text for 15, 17 and 18.
great :)
looks good but threw up some ideas...
> 15-1 Any member of the community may propose a new package. To be
> accepted, a package proposal must receive majority approval of the
>
Here is a stab at replacement text for 15, 17 and 18.
15-1 Any member of the community may propose a new package. To be
accepted, a package proposal must receive majority approval of the
subproject committers and at least one committer must volunteer to serve
as an initial package team member.
+1
-Rahul
On 7/3/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> On 7/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1 to drop this
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > >>8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core objects, a
>
robert burrell donkin wrote:
Agreed. After a little more discussion, we should rewrite this.
+1
anyone feel like jumping volunteering to come up with a draft?
Working on this now...
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [
+1
--
Martin Cooper
On 7/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 to drop this
>
> Phil
>
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> >>8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core objects, a
> >>JavaBean-style API, or to provide an optional JavaBean wrapper.
> >
> >
> > doesn't se
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 12:27 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Martin Cooper wrote:
> > On 6/23/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Interpreted literally, 17 goes against standard practice in jakarta (or
>
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 14:52 -0400, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On 6/23/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Interpreted literally, 17 goes against standard practice in jakarta (or
> > > apache, to my knowledge
+1 to drop this
Phil
robert burrell donkin wrote:
8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core objects, a
JavaBean-style API, or to provide an optional JavaBean wrapper.
doesn't seem very relevant. i think that it'd be simpler just to drop
it.
here's my +1
- robert
--8<-
> 8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core objects, a
> JavaBean-style API, or to provide an optional JavaBean wrapper.
doesn't seem very relevant. i think that it'd be simpler just to drop
it.
here's my +1
- robert
--8<-
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 14:33 -0400, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On 6/23/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> > > 4.1 in the guidelines repeats the error that I thought was fixed in the
> > > j-c guidelines saying that each p
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by RobertBurrellDonkin:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/DraftCharterForWebComponentCommons
The comment on the change is:
Deleted point 12
-
i count 4 +1's
the consensus seems to be in favour of removal so that's what i'm going
to do.
i propose to leave retain the number by noting those that have been
deleted (rather than removing them).
- robert
-
To unsubscribe,
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 01:55 -0500, Curt Arnold wrote:
> There has been some discussion about modifying the Logging Services
> project bylaws (http://logging.apache.org/site/bylaws.html) to
> address some concerns particular to the project. I was researching
> the Jakarta guidelines and stumb
15 matches
Mail list logo