+1
On Jul 4, 2005, at 2:15 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
+1
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core
objects, a
JavaBean-style API, or to provide an optional JavaBean wrapper.
doesn't seem very relevant. i think that it'd
Henri Yandell wrote:
Is there a BZ or Jira where one can open issues and add patches to the
jakarta-site module? Or is all such requests handled on this ml?
This mailing list is the best place.
Hi!
Here's the patch that I promised.
Regards,
Fredrik Westermarck
Index:
+1
- robert
On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 02:16 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote:
We should do the same on Commons at some point. Throw out the ones that
seem dead.
Hen
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i count 4 +1's
the consensus seems to be in favour of removal so that's
i count 5 +1's and no objections so i'm going to go ahead and delete
it.
- robert
On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 19:44 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core objects, a
JavaBean-style API, or to provide an optional JavaBean wrapper.
doesn't
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by RobertBurrellDonkin:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/DraftCharterForWebComponentCommons
The comment on the change is:
Dropped 8 as per POLL
committed. many thanks.
- robert
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 20:19 +0200, Fredrik Westermarck wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Is there a BZ or Jira where one can open issues and add patches to the
jakarta-site module? Or is all such requests handled on this ml?
This mailing list is the best
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by RobertBurrellDonkin:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/DraftCharterForWebComponentCommons
The comment on the change is:
Changed to reflect consensus
there doesn't see any enthusiasm for those new ideas and no objections
to phil's draft. i think we should go ahead and make the changes
suggested by phil.
- robert
On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 22:39 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 13:13 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
Here is a
(Was: Re: [Jakarta Wiki] Update of
DraftCharterForWebComponentCommons by RobertBurrellDonkin) - pasted
here since the title was getting too long ;-)
Thanks for making the changes Robert!
I propose we wrap changes in {{{DELETED}}} and {{{/DELETED}}} tags
(or ADDED tags, as appropriate) rather
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 15:23 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
(Was: Re: [Jakarta Wiki] Update of
DraftCharterForWebComponentCommons by RobertBurrellDonkin) - pasted
here since the title was getting too long ;-)
Thanks for making the changes Robert!
I propose we wrap changes in {{{DELETED}}} and
+1
On 7/5/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there doesn't see any enthusiasm for those new ideas and no objections
to phil's draft. i think we should go ahead and make the changes
suggested by phil.
- robert
On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 22:39 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
there doesn't see any enthusiasm for those new ideas and no objections
to phil's draft. i think we should go ahead and make the changes
suggested by phil.
I went ahead and updated, making some small changes to (hopefully)
address the points above. I marked the
Henri Yandell wrote:
are there any committers involved with JSTL around?
Sorry, I raised the question then entered in JavaOne-sleep-mode :(
if not, would anyone like to volunteer to sound them out about a move to
subproject status?
I vote for Standard being a separate Jakarta
Martin Cooper wrote:
+1 to just one dev and one user list, shared for all components, a la
Jakarta Commons.
Me too...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
14 matches
Mail list logo
