Hi Will,
Arguably, we don't land many new clients from a web page referral alone.
However, we have been able to build new client relationships based on
inquiries that originated with Jakarta and other OSS projects we
recommend and support. Often we simply provide some pro bono coaching
via telepho
+1 let's kill it ...wiki would be alright though
cheers
--
Torsten
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Thx
Nathan Bubna
<
Thx
Martin van den
Thanks much
Martin Cooper
Try it via http://struts.apache.org..
Mvgr,
Martin
John Armstrong wrote:
I'm trying to learn java struts and an old Jakarta Struts book is telling
me to go to jakarta.apache.org for the jakarta struts binary. When I go
there there's no mention of such under downloads. There's just "Struts"
und
Struts is no longer under the jakarta umbrella.
you'll find what you need at
http://struts.apache.org
FYI, it's usually quicker to try asking Google about such things first. :)
http://www.google.com/search?q=struts
oh, and since java is platform and operating system independent, there
is only on
On 2/8/06, John Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I'm trying to learn java struts and an old Jakarta Struts book is telling
> me to go to jakarta.apache.org for the jakarta struts binary. When I go
> there there's no mention of such under downloads. There's just "Struts"
> under Ex-Jakart
I'm trying to learn java struts and an old Jakarta Struts book is telling
me to go to jakarta.apache.org for the jakarta struts binary. When I go
there there's no mention of such under downloads. There's just "Struts"
under Ex-Jakarta, and when I go there, there's numerous downloads besides
Jakar
Henri-
My suggestions is to frame this page as primarily Jakarta-support related,
but allow people to list support for any Apache or Java product.As long as
the page doesn't look to spam-like there's really not a downside. If
tomcat.apache.org puts up a similar page, we could revise this.
Do we remove the people who list support for non-Jakarta products, or is
our vendor wiki page for all of the ASF?
Hen
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Tom Evans wrote:
+1 (as one of the vendors) for moving to the Wiki with a link from the
Jakarta home page as Will suggested, rather than killing it alt
+1 (as one of the vendors) for moving to the Wiki with a link from the
Jakarta home page as Will suggested, rather than killing it altogether.
We integrate Jakarta (along with many of the other Apache projects)
into just about everything we build. We also recommend these projects
to our clien
I'd be ok with a Wiki page. Ideally with a link from the Jakarta home page.
We just have to keep an eye on it to make sure it stays appropriate. We've
moved the Powered By Velocity page to the Wiki-- it gets updated regularly
by third parties -- and there have been no problems.
WILL
-
+1 if the vendors wanna be on our Wiki, i say we let 'em do it.
On 2/8/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What we did with Lucene was to move the hard-coded committer
> maintained list of projects and products that use Lucene to the wiki.
>
> Let the community self-maintain this sort o
Cool. Good luck as a TLP and hopefully you set an example for other
projects.
+1
Best regards
Henning
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 09:43 -0800, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> Below is the result of the recent Tapestry committers vote to move
> Tapestry to an Apache top level project
What we did with Lucene was to move the hard-coded committer
maintained list of projects and products that use Lucene to the wiki.
Let the community self-maintain this sort of thing.
+1 to moving it to the Jakarta wiki.
Erik
On Feb 7, 2006, at 8:17 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
As per
Will Glass-Husain wrote:
Specifically, if the vendors are Jakarta committers, and they find the
pages useful, we should consider keeping it.
Isn't Multitask Dion Gillhard for instance?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
17 matches
Mail list logo