On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Henri Yandell writes:
1) Remove SVN restrictions, all Jakarta committers can commit anywhere in
Jakarta, with the exception of the Commons-Sandbox as it allows Apache
committers in general to commit.
2) All vote t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Henri Yandell writes:
>1) Remove SVN restrictions, all Jakarta committers can commit anywhere in
>Jakarta, with the exception of the Commons-Sandbox as it allows Apache
>committers in general to commit.
>
>2) All vote threads to occur on the general@ mailing list;
Henri Yandell wrote:
Given that we are one project and that we should be acting as one
community
I both agree and disagree with the premise.
Jakarta is one community from an ASF point of view (not that important).
Jakarta is many communities in reality (really important).
Reality and practical
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Will Glass-Husain wrote:
>
> > I'm mildly positive on "all votes on general". A corollary of this
> would be
> > to encourage everyone to sign up for general. Maybe put this in big
> letters
> > on the Jakarta home pag
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Will Glass-Husain wrote:
I'm mildly positive on "all votes on general". A corollary of this would be
to encourage everyone to sign up for general. Maybe put this in big letters
on the Jakarta home page. It seems a good way to try out the "one
community" idea, see if it fi
I like #1 (removing svn restrictions). We occasionally identify bugs in the
commons libraries used in Velocity - it'd be nice to be able to just go in
and fix them.
I'm mildly positive on "all votes on general". A corollary of this would be
to encourage everyone to sign up for general. Maybe put
Felipe Leme wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> 1) Remove SVN restrictions, all Jakarta committers can commit anywhere
>> in Jakarta, with the exception of the Commons-Sandbox as it allows
>> Apache committers in general to commit.
>
>
> I'm +1 on this one. As others already pointed out, it would
Henri Yandell wrote:
1) Remove SVN restrictions, all Jakarta committers can commit anywhere
in Jakarta, with the exception of the Commons-Sandbox as it allows
Apache committers in general to commit.
I'm +1 on this one. As others already pointed out, it would help to keep
dormant/stable proje
On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 12:22 -0800, Nathan Bubna wrote:
> On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Given that we are one project and that we should be acting as one
> > community - I propose that we:
> >
> > 1) Remove SVN restrictions, all Jakarta committers can commit anywhere in
> >
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I started to write a long email on the problems in Jakarta, on umbrellas,
> on the lack of a Jakarta community and existence only of subcommunities
> and on how it should be "there is no Jakarta Xxxx, you are members of
> Jakarta - not a subpr
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I started to write a long email on the problems in Jakarta, on umbrellas,
> on the lack of a Jakarta community and existence only of subcommunities
> and on how it should be "there is no Jakarta Xxxx, you are members of
> Jakarta - not a sub
Hi!
>> So a Commons committer can commit to e.g. BCEL and Hivemind without
>> knowing the code bases? H
>> That doesn't sound right to me :-/
> What's the difference between an ORO guy being able to commit to
> OpenPGP and a Lang guy being able to commit to OpenPGP?
>
> Said ORO committer is ab
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Torsten Curdt wrote:
On 05.03.2006, at 20:21, Henri Yandell wrote:
I started to write a long email on the problems in Jakarta, on umbrellas,
on the lack of a Jakarta community and existence only of subcommunities and
on how it should be "there is no Jakarta Xxxx, you
On 3/5/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2) All vote threads to occur on the general@ mailing list; or the pmc@
> mailing list if deemed private.
I don't like the idea having a lot of discussion on one mailing list
and then loosing all that context by having votes on a different
maili
On 05.03.2006, at 20:21, Henri Yandell wrote:
I started to write a long email on the problems in Jakarta, on
umbrellas, on the lack of a Jakarta community and existence only of
subcommunities and on how it should be "there is no Jakarta Xxxx,
you are members of Jakarta - not a subproject
I started to write a long email on the problems in Jakarta, on umbrellas,
on the lack of a Jakarta community and existence only of subcommunities
and on how it should be "there is no Jakarta Xxxx, you are members of
Jakarta - not a subproject"; but you've heard it all before.
So, proposal:
16 matches
Mail list logo
