Folks,
this is *NOT* a VOTE thread. Please refrain from casting ballots
thanks,
dims
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm -1 because the Axis2 project is not just axis2- its a collection of
enabling pieces (axiom, neethi at least) and a bunch of up
Gee...thanks a ton for the clarficiation.
-- dims
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeez I wasn't casting a vote - I expressed my opinion and then made it clear
using the Apache terminology for expressing positions. Lighten up dude.
Sanjiva.
Dear Team,
For a few years now, there is a growing consensus at the board level
that a small focused PMC that directly reports to the board is better
than a huge umbrella PMCs. two umbrella PMC's have already made
transitions including XML and Jakarta.
One reason is that they have found that a
One reason is that they have found that a small focused PMC/committer
set takes better care of the code, web site, releases, legal issues
and basic oversight of day to day workings of a PMC better than a huge
umbrella PMC. For example, personally i think Synapse has thrived
after it left the
Deepal jayasinghe wrote:
Personally, I'd really like to get all of us committed, willing and
able to contribute in a much more coordinated fashion then we are
today. We don't hang out on IRC, no weekly chats, not much forward
looking discussions, not much enthusiasm or cooperation anymore from
Deepal,
yep, not taking care of them is what i meant. Yep, i totally
understand day-to-day work.
thanks,
dims
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Deepal jayasinghe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One reason is that they have found that a small focused PMC/committer
set takes better care of the code,
Hi dims, all:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
For a few years now, there is a growing consensus at the board level
that a small focused PMC that directly reports to the board is better
than a huge umbrella PMCs. two umbrella PMC's have already made
transitions including XML and Jakarta.
+1. As PMC
Hi Sanjiva:
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
Also the other reason IMO is that axis2 is mostly done .. I have no
objection at all to someone starting an axis3 or doing a lot of changes
to axis2, but I personally don't have major problems that I see need to
be fixed in axis2. Yes there are tons of
Kurt T Stam wrote:
jUDDI has 3 active developers working on implementing the UDDIv3 spec
(http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/webservices/juddi/branches/v3_trunk/)
. Please don't talk about moth-balling us!
Just checking to see if you were paying attention. :)
No way, Kurt - I hope to be using your
How does becoming a TLP change the status quo for getting things done?
Sanjiva.
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
No one is asking that everyone needs to get excited at the proposal.
If people are interested, let it move forward. If no one is
interested, it will just drop dead. If people take this
If we can find people to man the PMC's and act as chair, sure, let's
get more projects as TLP's.
-- dims
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glen, so if you agree that its a TLP with Axis2 + up stream and downstream
projects then why not push the other
Anything that is usable/shipped with Axis2 or depends on Axis2 IMHO.
-- dims
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So Glen, if we're talking about a new TLP what are the proposed components
under it? What will remain in the ws TLP because they don't have
12 matches
Mail list logo
