Anything that is usable/shipped with Axis2 or depends on Axis2 IMHO. -- dims
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So Glen, if we're talking about a new TLP what are the proposed components > under it? What will remain in the ws TLP because they don't have enough ammo > to be a TLP? > > Sanjiva. > > Glen Daniels wrote: >> >> Hi dims, all: >> >> Davanum Srinivas wrote: >>> >>> For a few years now, there is a growing consensus at the board level >>> that a small focused PMC that directly reports to the board is better >>> than a huge umbrella PMCs. two umbrella PMC's have already made >>> transitions including XML and Jakarta. >> >> +1. As PMC chair, I've definitely had a challenging time keeping up with >> everything going on in all the subprojects, and from a purely practical >> point of view, the board reports each quarter are pretty darn long. >> >>> One reason is that they have found that a small focused PMC/committer >>> set takes better care of the code, web site, releases, legal issues >>> and basic oversight of day to day workings of a PMC better than a huge >>> umbrella PMC. For example, personally i think Synapse has thrived >>> after it left the fold. >> >> +1 >> >>> Take a look at our web site(s), take a look at our release >>> schedules(s) - for all projects, take a look at our bug tracker(s). >>> Does anyone see that we are doing an excellent job? >> >> Point taken. >> >>> We need to gather momentum, going TLP is an excellent way to do that. >>> A small focused team that is working on a single goal of getting a >>> good set of Axis2 related projects going is i think the right way to >>> go. I think the Axis2 eco system will do better when we go TLP. >> >> I agree. >> >>> Personally, I'd really like to get all of us committed, willing and >>> able to contribute in a much more coordinated fashion then we are >>> today. We don't hang out on IRC, no weekly chats, not much forward >>> looking discussions, not much enthusiasm or cooperation anymore from >>> looking at the mailing lists. I am trying to see if we can jumpstart >>> that as well with this proposal. >> >> Well said! This was an excellent note, dims. >> >> I also very much believe that an Axis2 TLP will help get us focused on >> moving forward. >> >>> fwiw, Juddi and xmlrpc do not have sufficient people on board to go >>> TLP as of this moment. Yes, we should try harder to get more people >>> involved there or we end up moth-balling them. >> >> Well, yeah - they're certainly not TLP-capable, but as they're already >> subprojects I'd like to put off the decision to moth-ball them for a while >> as long as there is at least one person dedicated to working on them... >> hence the proposal to keep these guys under WS. >> >> Thanks, >> --Glen >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > -- > Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D. > Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/ > Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/ > Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ > Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/ > > Blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
