Re: [gentoo-amd64] spoofing browser identity

2009-06-16 Thread Daiajo Tibdixious
Thanks, I don't have an 'extras' menu, so I'm installing konq-plugins. On 6/13/09, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: On Samstag 13 Juni 2009, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote: I remember a year or more ago I found an option in either firefox or konquerer which allowed me to tell

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Why Is Gentoo So Far Behind?

2009-06-16 Thread Markos Chandras
In a lot of cases, for example perl, Xorg, and gcc, the Gentoo distribution lags far behind the latest available releases. Even allowing the ~amd64 unstable series, this remains true. Why is this so? Xorg? We have 2.6.2_pre . gcc? We have 4.4.0 . I dont know about perl :) I had first

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Why Is Gentoo So Far Behind?

2009-06-16 Thread Arttu V.
On 6/16/09, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Even allowing the ~amd64 unstable series, this remains true. Why is this so? Xorg? We have 2.6.2_pre . gcc? We have 4.4.0 . I dont know about perl :) Xorg-2.6.2_pre? In some overlay, not main portage tree? (Don't care, but that's my

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Why Is Gentoo So Far Behind?

2009-06-16 Thread Markos Chandras
On 6/16/09, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Even allowing the ~amd64 unstable series, this remains true. Why is this so? Xorg? We have 2.6.2_pre . gcc? We have 4.4.0 . I dont know about perl :) Xorg-2.6.2_pre? In some overlay, not main portage tree? (Don't care, but that's

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Why Is Gentoo So Far Behind?

2009-06-16 Thread Arttu V.
On 6/16/09, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: On 6/16/09, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Even allowing the ~amd64 unstable series, this remains true. Why is this so? Xorg? We have 2.6.2_pre . gcc? We have 4.4.0 . I dont know about perl :) Xorg-2.6.2_pre? In some

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Why Is Gentoo So Far Behind?

2009-06-16 Thread Markos Chandras
On 6/16/09, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: On 6/16/09, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Even allowing the ~amd64 unstable series, this remains true. Why is this so? Xorg? We have 2.6.2_pre . gcc? We have 4.4.0 . I dont know about perl :) Xorg-2.6.2_pre?

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Why Is Gentoo So Far Behind?

2009-06-16 Thread Mark Knecht
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Frank Petersfrank.pet...@comcast.net wrote: On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:48:24 -0700 Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: Personally I'm happy with pure stable most of the time so it doesn't effect me much. I am also definitely happy with the Gentoo system

[gentoo-amd64] Re: Why Is Gentoo So Far Behind?

2009-06-16 Thread Duncan
Arttu V. arttu...@gmail.com posted fecdbac60906160403r3d81bdc3uedcb0f6c89b50...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted below, on Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:03:33 +0300: Yes, you test both new packages and new devs extensively. :D I think that was the crux of the last low manpower thread over at gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Why Is Gentoo So Far Behind?

2009-06-16 Thread Chris Faulkner
Well Frank, First and foremost, Gentoo is quite far ahead of the other distros. I choose Gentoo on my server farm specifically because it is much higher ahead in the stable department so much more than Ubuntu and RHEL which ironically are the leaders in server OS deployment. All too often I run

[gentoo-amd64] Re: Why Is Gentoo So Far Behind?

2009-06-16 Thread Duncan
Frank Peters frank.pet...@comcast.net posted 20090615222731.b12f5121.frank.pet...@comcast.net, excerpted below, on Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:27:31 -0400: In a lot of cases, for example perl, Xorg, and gcc, the Gentoo distribution lags far behind the latest available releases. Even allowing the

[gentoo-amd64] Re: Why Is Gentoo So Far Behind?

2009-06-16 Thread Duncan
Arttu V. arttu...@gmail.com posted fecdbac60906160512p588c72c3ma0e7a38d6b48c...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted below, on Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:12:16 +0300: For example, IIRC the default emerge printouts don't give you any indication that there are actual later versions available (even just in the

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Why Is Gentoo So Far Behind?

2009-06-16 Thread Frank Peters
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:54:41 -0500 Chris Faulkner cfaulkne...@gmail.com wrote: I tell you what, do what a lot of people are doing and that is making your own ebuilds. Make a website, put your ebuilds on it and test it out. You will further gentoo-dev out much better than it is now.

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Why Is Gentoo So Far Behind?

2009-06-16 Thread The Doctor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frank Peters wrote: I am also definitely happy with the Gentoo system that I have built, but I was just wondering about the reason for the apparent lag in putting out the latest versions. Maybe I'm getting a little conservative in my old age, but

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Why Is Gentoo So Far Behind?

2009-06-16 Thread Richard Freeman
Frank Peters wrote: Maybe I'll post some ebuilds for cooledit and nedit. These are two text editors for which I've filed bug reports and fixes, but there has been no action yet due to lack of maintainers. It may be a while though. After quickly looking through the developer's manual, I can