On Tuesday 28 February 2006 16:57, "Rupert Young (Restart)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about '[gentoo-amd64] glibc
update problem':
> CPU 0: Machine check Exception 4 Bank 0: f60c2136
>
> TSC 177daa0cc8aof ADDR 1af80e80
>
> Kernal panic: Machine check
Sounds like failing ram to me.
--
"
Is anyone where successfully running an amd64 profile on a EM64T chip, like
the nocona? Is this a supported configuration? Or, should EM64T users
use a x86 profile, with a custom CHOST?
--
"If there's one thing we've established over the years,
it's that the vast majority of our users don't h
On Thursday 09 March 2006 09:11, "Gavin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about '[gentoo-amd64] /dev/hda1 won't mount from grub':
> Hi,
> I reinstalled and the boot partition wont mount. It is reiser,
Reiser, eh? Some versions of grub have a problem with reiser's tail
packing. Make sure you mount th
On Friday 10 March 2006 07:13, "Gavin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] /dev/hda1 won't mount from grub':
> Do you mean to 'touch' everything in /boot? Yes I added 'notail' to the
> fstab entry. Should I make /boot ext2?
Yes, something along the lines of:
find /boot -type f -
On Friday 10 March 2006 09:11, Bo Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] upgrading from 2005.0 x86, to 2006.0 amd64':
> On Friday 10 March 2006 14:51, Mike Williams wrote:
> > At the moment it's happily running a 32bit kernel, with 32bit
> > userland. From my experimentation
On Friday 10 March 2006 20:58, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about
'[gentoo-amd64] Re: /dev/hda1 won't mount from grub':
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> excerpted below, on Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:57:57 -0600:
> > *I* run ext2/3
On Monday 13 March 2006 17:26, Neil Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] Am i being over optomistic ?':
> Any chance someone could email me a copy of the /proc/config.gz file
> from an Athlon64 ?
Isn't there a make defconfig target, for quickly accepting the defaults?
There
On Monday 13 March 2006 17:50, "Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-amd64] booted 32-bit chroot but cannot emerge':
> Hi,
>Where is ARCH supposed to be set?
ARCH should be set in the make.defaults of your profile (or one of it's
parent profiles).
> ARCH not set!
> Are you
On Saturday 25 March 2006 17:37, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-amd64] Re: 2.6.16 and ndiswrapper':
> I only found another late in the cycle, when I upgraded to 8 gigs of
> memory from 1 gig. .15 and stable releases thereof work. .16 doesn't.
> I haven't had time to trace that
On Saturday 25 March 2006 20:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re:
[gentoo-amd64] Re: 2.6.16 and ndiswrapper':
> On Saturday 25 March 2006 17:58, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > I'm running a Tyan Dual-Opteron Dual-PCIe board... If you've got a
> > sim
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 15:29, Mike Arthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-amd64] Moving to no-multilib profile':
> Is there anything else I need to/should do before/after I move to the
> profile?
If you use grub, prepare to abandon it in favor of either the binary
version or lilo, w
On Thursday 20 April 2006 06:18, Mike Arthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] Moving to no-multilib profile':
> Can grub not be compiled in 64-bit mode?
No.
--
"If there's one thing we've established over the years,
it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slig
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 20:53, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: Re: Giving up 64 platform':
> Of course, folks like me would then want to rearrange the partitions a
> bit, but given today's 200 gig plus hard drives, copying a few
> partitions around is easier than s
On Sunday 30 April 2006 14:53, Robert Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-amd64] installed packages':
> whenever a needed ~amd64 package turns to stable, i want
> that script to remove the entry from package.keywords.
Why not just use a more specific atom, one which includes a parital
On Friday 05 May 2006 03:39, "Christian Aistleitner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-amd64] gcc-config (gcc32) infos':
> I know that gcc-config is responsible for creating gcc32 and gcc64 and
> actually calling the correct gcc with -m32 or -m64. However someone
> using Fedora Core just to
On Saturday 06 May 2006 15:18, Nuitari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] How to install to a RAID set?':
> I would only use only actual real Hardware RAID such as an IBM ServeRaid
> card.
Or any one of the Areca line.
--
"If there's one thing we've established over the years,
On Saturday 06 May 2006 15:47, Neil Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] How to install to a RAID set?':
> Now here is a thing, is it possible to build gentoo form the ground up
> on a software RAID config.. i am pondering purchasing a gentoo server,
> but i figure theres no p
On Sunday 07 May 2006 06:06, "Peter Humphrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] How to install to a RAID set?':
> I've found a card that seems ideal for my needs: one that will fit into
> the 32-bit PCI 2.2 slots on this motherboard but doesn't cost more than
> the pair of disks
On Friday 12 May 2006 17:33, "Christopher E" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about '[gentoo-amd64] To Worrie or Not Worrie!':
> some thing like this ... it seems to be moved
This is due to the way portage installs software. In particular, I started
noticing it around the same time we got the split kd
On Saturday 13 May 2006 11:53, B Vance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re:
[gentoo-amd64] Xorg issue now after update!':
> Not to mention, I'm not sure how
> you enable the SLI capability in Xorg. :-)
You have to use the binary driver and pass a special option. X.org may
still complain about t
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 05:47, Peter Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] How to install to a RAID set?':
> Well, I tried the Software-RAID-HOWTO, and used a SuSE 9.3 DVD I had
> lying around to create /dev/md0 to /dev/md5 on the /dev/sd[ab] disks
> that are attached to th
On Saturday 20 May 2006 10:19, "Christopher E" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Advice Wanted! Setup Instuctions ...':
> > I've only done the initial stage-1 setup, and now they recommend
> > starting from stage three and just doing an emerge --emptytree, so I
> > don't have
On Thursday 13 July 2006 08:50, "Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Dual Head':
> On 7/13/06, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> slaveryware
>
> freedomware
>
>
> Must we use such charged language around here?
Duncan's had this discussion with a number of
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 14:40, Andrei Slavoiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] About gcc 4.1.1':
> --- Bráulio Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -mtune=athlon64 -march=athlon64
> > -mmmx -msse -msse2 -m3dnow"
>
> First, -mtune is implied when you use
On Thursday 31 August 2006 06:13, "Lorenzo Milesi"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about '[gentoo-amd64] Mplayer':
> Does anyone of you use ~amd64 up up to date and have problems with
> mplayer?
I've masked off
=media-libs/x264-svn-20060810
=media-video/mplayer-1.0_pre20060810
because they caused a dow
On Thursday 31 August 2006 06:43, Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] About gcc 4.1.1':
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > Yeah, but -march might be filtered by the ebuild and -mtune not; I
> > like using both of them. Similar to th
On Thursday 31 August 2006 11:31, "Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-amd64] Re: About gcc 4.1.1':
> "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 31
> Aug
>
> 2006 07
On Thursday 31 August 2006 11:39, "Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-amd64] Re: Mplayer':
> "Lorenzo Milesi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
> below, on Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:13:54 +0200:
> > Does anyone of you use ~amd64 up up to date and have problems wit
On Friday 01 September 2006 02:09, "Kevin F. Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: About gcc 4.1.1':
> The job of Gentoo ebuild Developers is to provide an ebuild that will
> generate a package that (ideally) "just works", in a supported
> environment (i.e. one of the sup
On Friday 01 September 2006 04:36, Pascal BERTIN
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about '[gentoo-amd64] few gcc upgrade
questions.':
> Second a small (and possibly stupid) question.
> can you use --resume in a -e emerge (after having unmerged something
> else) ?
You can (for example to --skipfirst), bu
On Sunday 03 September 2006 14:39, "Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-amd64] Re: JRE - how to install one?':
> I don't have a Java installed as
> none of the options Gentoo provides for that are freedomware and I don't
> need it enough to bother researching it further.
Actually, k
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 12:24, "Sebastian Redl"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: JRE -
how to install one?':
> On Tue, September 5, 2006 9:15 am, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > Actually, kaffe (GPL-2 licenced) is now an
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 11:03, "Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-amd64] Re: JRE - how to install one?':
> "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 05
> Sep
> 2006
On Thursday 07 September 2006 18:06, Brian Litzinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] Lack
of 'ondemand' power govenor':
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:04:17AM +1200, Jamie wrote:
> > Can anyone offer me any ideas on this, a day of Googling has not
> > turned up anything I have f
34 matches
Mail list logo
