On Monday 28 May 2007 05:42:25 Wil Reichert wrote:
The thing I've wondered about GPL'ing java, is when do we finally get
a native 64 bit browser plugin?
++
I guess since M$ announced that Vista will be the last 64bit system they ship
there will be one sooner rather then later.
--
Naga
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Sunday 27 May 2007, Isidore Ducasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Sun and GPL':
Or did you mean dual-licensing GPLv2
and GPLv3?
Still, dual-licensing under incompatible licenses is fine and I think many
(but maybe not most
On Monday 28 May 2007, Richard Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Sun and GPL':
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Sunday 27 May 2007, Isidore Ducasse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Sun and GPL':
Note that while you can dual-license on ANY
On 5/28/07, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 28 May 2007, Richard Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
snip
That requires
a bit of trust to work, and I'm not sure it is the best model. Sure,
with RS in charge I'm not worried, but nobody lives forever...
Worst case
Isidore Ducasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 28 May 2007
02:41:49 +0200:
le Sun, 27 May 2007 23:32:49 + (UTC) Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit:
They ARE considering dual-licensing Solaris under GPLv3, however, which
they've been working closely
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 28 May
2007 05:42:32 -0500:
So, Duncan's idea of dual-licensing the kernel under GPL v2/v3 until
all bits of kernel code written by non-agreeing parties are removed
would not work.
Right, but Linus
On Mon, 28 May 2007 11:14:46 + (UTC)
Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Much snippage
First, you may or may not have heard of Nexenta, or the Gentoo on
OpenSolaris port, etc. You also may or may not be aware that
Gentoo/FBSD is one of the other Gentoo Alt projects, from what I read
coming
On Montag, 28. Mai 2007, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Things will also be nicer under the GPLv3, because they've extended
optional or any greater version published by the FSF to be an
optional or any license approved by foo where foo could be Linus
Torvalds, X.org, or the Gentoo Foundation.
Things will also be nicer under the GPLv3, because they've extended
optional or any greater version published by the FSF to be an
optional or any license approved by foo where foo could be Linus
Torvalds, X.org, or the Gentoo Foundation.
Am I the only one who sees this as THE invitation to a
Conway S. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon,
28 May 2007 07:14:15 -0600:
Last I heard, Gentoo/FBSD was stalled, due to licensing terms. But it
was some time ago, has that changed?
I don't believe it's stalled now. Among other things, Roy is designing
Isidore Ducasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 27 May 2007
13:11:03 +0200:
I've heard that Sun recently released the Java platform under GPL, and
that all of their softs are going to follow in a near future.
Not necessarily (or likely) /all/ their
le Sun, 27 May 2007 23:32:49 + (UTC)
Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Not necessarily (or likely) /all/ their software, but significant parts
of it. OpenSolaris is currently CDDL, which /is/ OSI approved as a real
open license, but was designed in part deliberately to be GPLv2
On 5/27/07, Isidore Ducasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
le Sun, 27 May 2007 23:32:49 + (UTC)
Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Not necessarily (or likely) /all/ their software, but significant parts
of it. OpenSolaris is currently CDDL, which /is/ OSI approved as a real
open license, but
On Sunday 27 May 2007, Isidore Ducasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Sun and GPL':
le Sun, 27 May 2007 23:32:49 + (UTC)
Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
They ARE considering dual-licensing Solaris under GPLv3, however,
which they've been working closely
14 matches
Mail list logo
