Selon Nuitari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You can have mplayer(64 bit) and mplayer-bin(32 bit) concurrently on a
> gentoo installation. Whenever you need the 32 bit part just use
> mplayer-bin
This also works and enables the use of win32codecs on a 64 bit platform
(using a 32bit mplayer of course).
If
One problem I see with your suggestion is that I need to play wmv
files from web links and the win32codecs flag for mplayer is masked
out on my box. Until I set this positive in my chroot'ed environment
all I got was audio. With it turned on I get video also.
If this cannot be turned on in the 64
Mark Knecht wrote:
One problem I see with your suggestion is that I need to play wmv
files from web links and the win32codecs flag for mplayer is masked
out on my box. Until I set this positive in my chroot'ed environment
all I got was audio. With it turned on I get video also.
If this cannot b
On 12/7/05, Milton Yates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le mercredi 07 décembre 2005 à 11:46 -0500, Nuitari a écrit :
> > > 1) If I build and boot a 32-bit version of Gentoo it is my
> > > understanding that the AMD64 will be completely 32-bit compatible and
> > > that I can run whatever any other IA
Le mercredi 07 décembre 2005 à 11:46 -0500, Nuitari a écrit :
> > 1) If I build and boot a 32-bit version of Gentoo it is my
> > understanding that the AMD64 will be completely 32-bit compatible and
> > that I can run whatever any other IA-32 machine can run. Is this
> > correct?
>
> Yes
>
> > 2)
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 14:24:06 -0600 (CST)
"Brett Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A slight change to the above. The requirement to use athlon-xp in the
> 32-bit chroot is not for bit correctness, it is because GCC 3.3 doesnt
> support amd64 specific -march setting. GCC 3.4 just recently went
>
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 14:24 -0600, Brett Johnson wrote:
> A slight change to the above. The requirement to use athlon-xp in the
> 32-bit chroot is not for bit correctness, it is because GCC 3.3 doesnt
> support amd64 specific -march setting. GCC 3.4 just recently went stable
> for x86, so in theor
>>
>> A useful pointer - thanks. But it seems to assume that we use Athlon XP
>> processors (FLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -msse2 -pipe
>> -fomit-frame-pointer"). My box has Opterons, so I assume I should
>> substitute "-march=opteron", no?
>>
>> I've found explanations a bit thin on the ground as
typo on my part, athlon-xp
>
> athlon_xp or athlon-xp? The Gentoo doc for the chroot stated the
> later. Or does it matter?
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
> --
> gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
Random Thought:
---
Peter Griffin: Waiting in line for bathroom after drinking prune smoot
On 12/7/05, Brett Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the 32-bit chroot, you should use athlon_xp as that is
> the most conservative setting for running in 32 bit mode on the k8
> architecture.
athlon_xp or athlon-xp? The Gentoo doc for the chroot stated the
later. Or does it matter?
Thanks
>
> A useful pointer - thanks. But it seems to assume that we use Athlon XP
> processors (FLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -msse2 -pipe
> -fomit-frame-pointer"). My box has Opterons, so I assume I should
> substitute "-march=opteron", no?
>
> I've found explanations a bit thin on the ground as to what t
On 12/7/05, Daniel Gryniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 19:35 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:44:01 -0600 (CST)
> > "Brett Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Here is a good doc on how to set this up:
> > >
> > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/e
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 19:35 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:44:01 -0600 (CST)
> "Brett Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Here is a good doc on how to set this up:
> >
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/howtos/index.xml?part=1&chap=3
>
> A useful pointer - t
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:44:01 -0600 (CST)
"Brett Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is a good doc on how to set this up:
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/howtos/index.xml?part=1&chap=3
A useful pointer - thanks. But it seems to assume that we use Athlon XP
processors (FLAGS="-O
Brett Johnson wrote:
When the actual 32 bit X app starts up, it will use sockets to talk
directly to your 64 bit X server.
This is the same as starting a X application on a remote system with X
forwarding. The actual code is executed on the remote system (what ever
the platform is) and the disp
>
> I do find it surprising/curious/mystifying that I can run, for
> instance, a 32-bit Firefox with 32-bit helper apps, all running from
> the chrooted environment, but as far as I can tell, you are saying it
> will be using a 64-bit version of X, along with 64-bit ATI drivers,
> 64-bit Alsa and a
Mark Knecht wrote:
I'm sure I don't have this quite right in my mind yet. I presume that
to build FIrefox and mplayer in the chrooted environemnt I will end up
building a 32-bit version of X, etc., but I guess it's not used?
exactly :)
it just needs those 32-bit libraries to link against. All
On 12/7/05, Brett Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> 1) Yes, if you install x86 version of gentoo, it will be 100% functional
> as a 32 bit OS.
>
> 2) You can install a 32 bit choot version of gentoo under you 64 bit os
> and be able to run 32 bit apps in the chroot while still runni
Hi Mark,
1) Yes, if you install x86 version of gentoo, it will be 100% functional
as a 32 bit OS.
2) You can install a 32 bit choot version of gentoo under you 64 bit os
and be able to run 32 bit apps in the chroot while still running the 64
bit os. This option will require additional disk space
Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
My wife and I signed up for a class that is taught partially in
person and to a great extent on the web. To use the material it's the
usual set of requirements - Windows, IE or Firefox, Java, Flash, an
audio player that plays stuff on the page, etc., or a Mac. My wife's
Am Mittwoch, den 07.12.2005, 08:39 -0800 schrieb Mark Knecht:
>Some questions:
>
> 1) If I build and boot a 32-bit version of Gentoo it is my
> understanding that the AMD64 will be completely 32-bit compatible and
> that I can run whatever any other IA-32 machine can run. Is this
> correct?
Co
Mark Knecht wrote:
2) If I build a 32-bit install is there anyway to run this 32-bit
environment within the 64-bit environment? I assume not.
that's exactly what a 32-bit chroot is. You run 64-bit, but you chroot
into the 32-bit directory which basically has a copy of gentoo in it but
with "a
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 08:39 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
>My wife and I signed up for a class that is taught partially in
> person and to a great extent on the web. To use the material it's the
> usual set of requirements - Windows, IE or Firefox, Java, Flash, an
> audio player that plays st
1) If I build and boot a 32-bit version of Gentoo it is my
understanding that the AMD64 will be completely 32-bit compatible and
that I can run whatever any other IA-32 machine can run. Is this
correct?
Yes
2) If I build a 32-bit install is there anyway to run this 32-bit
environment within th
Hi,
My wife and I signed up for a class that is taught partially in
person and to a great extent on the web. To use the material it's the
usual set of requirements - Windows, IE or Firefox, Java, Flash, an
audio player that plays stuff on the page, etc., or a Mac. My wife's
32-bit Gentoo machine
25 matches
Mail list logo
