-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Steve Herber wrote:
>
>
>>here is my short list of configuration commands to check:
>>
>>fix_libtool_files.sh
>>gcc-config -l
>>binutils-config -l
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ gcc-config -l
> [1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.4
Steve Herber wrote:
> here is my short list of configuration commands to check:
>
> fix_libtool_files.sh
> gcc-config -l
> binutils-config -l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ gcc-config -l
[1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.4 *
[2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.4-hardened
[3] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.4-hardenednopie
[4]
here is my short list of configuration commands to check:
fix_libtool_files.sh
gcc-config -l
binutils-config -l
I don't know if running them will fix your system but they help.
Steve Herber[EMAIL PROTECTED] work: 206-221-7262
Security Engineer, UW Medicine, IT Services hom
I wrote:
>Should I boot from the installation disk, chroot and remerge gcc? I'll try
>that when I can but that won't be
>just yet.
>
Well, this morning I did that except that I said "emerge -e portage",
and rebooted Gnome, but still the problem's here. Maybe I should emerge
-e twice...
--
gent
On Tue, June 28, 2005 10:47 am, Mauro Venanzi said:
> why have you the "Os" flag? waht is it?
> the same dubt for mtune
> try to write -O2 not Os
-Os optimizes for size and works just fine for me. In systems with
limited RAM it is likely to give better performance than -O2 since you are
less lik
i need to study your make.cong but seems to me
that this line is mistaken
> CFLAGS="-Os -march=opteron -mtune=opteron"
should be
CFLAGS="-march=opteron -pipe -O2 -mtune=opteron"
why have you the "Os" flag? waht is it?
the same dubt for mtune
try to write -O2 not Os
cioa
--- Peter Humphrey
Mauro Venanzi wrote:
>can you post us your make.conf ?
>
>
Sure:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ cat /etc/make.conf
# These settings were set by the catalyst build script that
automatically built this stage
### Actually, most of them weren't.
# Please consult /etc/make.conf.example for a more
can you post us your make.conf ?
--- Peter Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Justin Frisch wrote:
>
> >I'm not sure if this is the same thing that
> happened to me... however recently
> >I had an update to binutils that somehow made
> everything not compile anymore.
> >After doing
Justin Frisch wrote:
>I'm not sure if this is the same thing that happened to me... however recently
>I had an update to binutils that somehow made everything not compile anymore.
>After doing a:
>
># binutils-config -l
> [1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-2.16.1
>
>I saw that the binutils wasn't selecte
Am Tuesday, 28. June 2005 08:55 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> I'm running both a Gnome and an Xfce4 system on this box, both having
> ~amd64 in keywords, keeping them up to date every day or two. Yesterday
> I found that any attempt to update the system failed with an error like
> this one, taken from
I'm running both a Gnome and an Xfce4 system on this box, both having
~amd64 in keywords, keeping them up to date every day or two. Yesterday
I found that any attempt to update the system failed with an error like
this one, taken from emerging modutils this morning:
* Building modutils...
* econ
11 matches
Mail list logo