Re: [gentoo-amd64] Where is '@system'?

2010-03-05 Thread Mark Knecht
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 6:31 PM, James Ausmus wrote: >> To see bare system, do: >> USE="-*" emerge -pev @system >> > > Actually, this is a very good way to explore the effect of certain > flags on the total package count. Thanks. > > As a minimu

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Where is '@system'?

2010-03-05 Thread Mark Knecht
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 6:31 PM, James Ausmus wrote: > To see bare system, do: > USE="-*" emerge -pev @system > Actually, this is a very good way to explore the effect of certain flags on the total package count. Thanks. As a minimum set your command shows USE="-*" emerge -pev @system -> Total:

RE: [gentoo-amd64] Where is '@system'?

2010-03-04 Thread Sylvain Alain
ply to the gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org and close that thread :P Thanks Salut alp > Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:44:36 -0800 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Where is '@system'? > From: markkne...@gmail.com > To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Where is '@system'?

2010-03-04 Thread malc
cat /usr/portage/profiles/base/packages - and all will be revealed :) All profiles should inherit from this - but may provide their own modifications - e.g. /usr/portage/profiles/arch/sparc/packages adds sparc-utils to @system on that set of platforms. Cheers, malc. On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:44

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Where is '@system'?

2010-03-04 Thread James Ausmus
To see bare system, do: USE="-*" emerge -pev @system On Mar 4, 2010 6:02 PM, "Mark Knecht" wrote: On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Paul Hartman > wrote: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Mark Knecht

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Where is '@system'?

2010-03-04 Thread Richard Freeman
On 03/04/2010 08:44 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: Yeah, that's interesting and to some extent anyway probably involved with why I'm getting a lot of the package I get. What I'm not understanding yet is what packages themselves are in @system. Where do those come from? I'm assuming that because of all th

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Where is '@system'?

2010-03-04 Thread Mark Knecht
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Paul Hartman >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: I would like emerge -epv @system to be a fairly contained set of

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Where is '@system'?

2010-03-04 Thread Paul Hartman
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Paul Hartman > wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: >>> I would like emerge -epv @system to be a fairly contained set of >>> packages. (If possible like it was when I first built the sy

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Where is '@system'?

2010-03-04 Thread Mark Knecht
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: >> I would like emerge -epv @system to be a fairly contained set of >> packages. (If possible like it was when I first built the system a >> mere 5 weeks ago...) It seems out of control on m

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Where is '@system'?

2010-03-04 Thread Paul Hartman
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: > I would like emerge -epv @system to be a fairly contained set of > packages. (If possible like it was when I first built the system a > mere 5 weeks ago...) It seems out of control on my system these days > as it wants to emerge 242 packages. O