On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 6:31 PM, James Ausmus wrote:
>> To see bare system, do:
>> USE="-*" emerge -pev @system
>>
>
> Actually, this is a very good way to explore the effect of certain
> flags on the total package count. Thanks.
>
> As a minimu
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 6:31 PM, James Ausmus wrote:
> To see bare system, do:
> USE="-*" emerge -pev @system
>
Actually, this is a very good way to explore the effect of certain
flags on the total package count. Thanks.
As a minimum set your command shows
USE="-*" emerge -pev @system -> Total:
ply to the gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org and close that
thread :P
Thanks
Salut
alp
> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:44:36 -0800
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Where is '@system'?
> From: markkne...@gmail.com
> To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at
cat /usr/portage/profiles/base/packages - and all will be revealed :)
All profiles should inherit from this - but may provide their own
modifications - e.g.
/usr/portage/profiles/arch/sparc/packages adds sparc-utils to @system
on that set of platforms.
Cheers,
malc.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:44
To see bare system, do:
USE="-*" emerge -pev @system
On Mar 4, 2010 6:02 PM, "Mark Knecht" wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Mark Knecht
On 03/04/2010 08:44 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
Yeah, that's interesting and to some extent anyway probably involved
with why I'm getting a lot of the package I get. What I'm not
understanding yet is what packages themselves are in @system. Where do
those come from? I'm assuming that because of all th
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Paul Hartman
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
I would like emerge -epv @system to be a fairly contained set of
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> I would like emerge -epv @system to be a fairly contained set of
>>> packages. (If possible like it was when I first built the sy
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> I would like emerge -epv @system to be a fairly contained set of
>> packages. (If possible like it was when I first built the system a
>> mere 5 weeks ago...) It seems out of control on m
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> I would like emerge -epv @system to be a fairly contained set of
> packages. (If possible like it was when I first built the system a
> mere 5 weeks ago...) It seems out of control on my system these days
> as it wants to emerge 242 packages. O
10 matches
Mail list logo