On Sunday 05 June 2005 23:55, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 16:57 -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well obviously there needs to be a consensus on *how* to logically
organize things before anyone goes willy nilly changing stuff. Do
Michael Cummings wrote:
Solar,
I realize you meant this as a general statement of opinion and not a
flame-baiter, but can you elaborate on:
On Sunday 05 June 2005 11:37, Ned Ludd wrote:
Invalidates binary package trees.
My (wrong?) understanding was that this is addressed when
On Monday 06 June 2005 23:06, sf wrote:
I always thought it was known that fixpackages is a non-working kludge;
my portage tree/binary packages get messed up with almost every package
move, rename etc.
If fixpackages is supposed to be working who should I assign my soon to
be regular,
Hi list,
Shyam Mani, or fox2mike as some of you know him, has just joined up to
help out with documentation. He lives in Bangalore, India, having been
born in Dubai. Having just finished his Bachelor of Engineering in
Computer Science, he now works for a technology consutancy firm called
Exocore.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Martin wrote:
Hi list,
Shyam Mani, or fox2mike as some of you know him, has just joined up to
help out with documentation. He lives in Bangalore, India, having been
born in Dubai. Having just finished his Bachelor of Engineering in
Hello everybody!
We are a group of students at Freie Universitaet Berlin.
As part of our computer science studies we are going to do
a survey facing the use of design patterns in communication.
Examples of design patterns are Abstract Factory,
Singleton, Composite, Iterator and Listener.
If
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
José Alberto Suárez López wrote:
hey!!
congratulations :)
Thanks a lot BaSS, Glad to be here ;)
- --
Shyam Mani
Gentoo Documentation Project - http://gdp.gentoo.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Fingerprint: 1862 2699 5631 06E1 ADA0 4269 6193 5880 FDD0
I'm with Ned fozer on this, in general at least. This is the second time this
issue has come up over the last month or so; it's what kicks off the flat-tree
debate. My preference in practice is to leave the current tree allocation of
packages to categories well alone (to avoid unnecessary
Hi guys,
As some of you have noticed, I made a change recently in ekeyword that
causes ekeyword to alphabetize the keywords. I've realized I should
have brought it up for discussion before making the change to the
program. On that note, I apologize for unilaterally making that
change without
On Monday 06 June 2005 06:26 pm, Aron Griffis wrote:
alpha
i'm all for alpha (as many know seeing as how they've cursed me profusely when
i first started doing it) ... seeing as how i tend to mark for 4 or 5 arches,
alpha is a huge help since i know about where to look in the list
also,
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Aron Griffis wrote:
As some of you have noticed, I made a change recently in ekeyword that
causes ekeyword to alphabetize the keywords. I've realized I should
The games team has been alphabetizing keywords for some time. Just an
added datapoint.
Michael Sterrett
-Mr.
* Aron Griffis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05/06/06 18:26 -0400]:
alpha
-
- looks nicer (subjective)
- easier to tell at a glance if a given keyword is in the list
I'm for this. You can easily compare two ebuilds' KEYWORDS,
when you have the same order.
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 06 June 2005 06:26 pm, Aron Griffis wrote:
alpha
i'm all for alpha (as many know seeing as how they've cursed me profusely
when
i first started doing it) ... seeing as how i tend to mark for 4 or 5 arches,
alpha is a huge help since i know about
This is kinda bloggish, because it's basically a transcription of an
IRC monologue. My apologies if it's hard to follow... Nonetheless,
I'm interested in how other developers feel on the topics I bring up
below.
There have been some really interesting points brought up recently
about where is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aron Griffis wrote:
I have worked in the enterprise
UNIX market for 6 years. My code is running in places like NASA
mission control, 9-1-1 call centers, and most of the telephone
carriers. I've produced patches on weekends to close $800m deals.
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 19:55 -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
snip
In my humble opinion, Gentoo is missing too many points to be an
enterprise Linux. We commit to a live tree. We don't have true QA,
testing or tinderbox. We don't have paid staff, alpha/beta/rc cycles.
We don't really have
On Monday 06 June 2005 16:55, Aron Griffis wrote:
I think that attempting to take Gentoo in the enterprise direction
is a mistake. I think that we are a hobbyist distribution. This
doesn't mean that we should not strive to meet some of the enterprise
goals. Those things can be important to
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 19:55 -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
In my humble opinion, Gentoo is missing too many points to be an
enterprise Linux. We commit to a live tree. We don't have true QA,
testing or tinderbox. We don't have paid staff, alpha/beta/rc cycles.
We don't really have product
On Monday 06 June 2005 19:45, Collins Richey wrote:
2. Enterprise users (as a general rule) are not interested in the
latest and greatest but rather in a stable, reasonably current system
that can remain in place (with guaranteed security fixes, of course)
with no feature creep for a few
On Monday 06 June 2005 20:36, Mike Frysinger wrote:
you really cant make that kind of general statement and expect it to
hold ... often times there are packages where newer versions suck more
than previous ones (the way in which they suck i leave up to your
imagination) ... security/stable
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:55:50PM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
I'd like Gentoo to be a place where neat things are developed.
If RH or SuSE (or another for-profit Linux vendor) wants to take some
of those developments and use them to make a profit, that's fine with
me. We're over here having
I'm not a developer, but I'm a Gentoo bigot and I'd like to join the
discussion :).
Aron Griffis wrote:
In my humble opinion, Gentoo is missing too many points to be an
enterprise Linux. We commit to a live tree. We don't have true QA,
testing or tinderbox. We don't have paid staff,
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 21:51 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
One thing that people might want to remember, if Gentoo ever changes
into a real, we take your money for support type of distro, a lot of
the employers of the us developers might reconsider allowing them to
participate. Which would pretty
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
I've got a Zaurus; it's running some kind of Linux
and I'll probably put Gentoo on it when I get some spare cycles,
provided Gentoo runs on the 6000. But I'm sure as hell not gonna try to
run R or TeXmacs or Maxima on it!
Dang -- I just remembered -- I *am*
On Jun 6, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Aron Griffis wrote:
This is kinda bloggish, because it's basically a transcription of an
IRC monologue. My apologies if it's hard to follow... Nonetheless,
I'm interested in how other developers feel on the topics I bring up
below.
overlay capabilities are
25 matches
Mail list logo
