On Saturday 28 October 2006 02:46, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 08:11:37AM +0200, George Shapovalov wrote:
> > One of the reasons herds were introduced was to explicitly see what
> > packages lack maintenance. It is possible for the ebuild to be in the
> > herd, but be supporte
Christian Heim wrote:
> Its my pleasure to introduce to you Christian Faulhammer (also known as
> opfer), our latest addition helping with xemacs and the x86 monkeys.
Woo hoo! :D
--
by design, by neglect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]for a fact or just for
Am Freitag, den 27.10.2006, 22:32 +0200 schrieb Christian Heim:
> Christian is currently studying mechanical engineering at the RWTH Aachen
> (that's in Germany!) and has been an arch tester for the x86-herd for quite
> some time - that's about 3 months.
Welcome aboard, Christian! See you at LW
In connection with latest globalization of mplayer USE flag I would like to ask
for globalizing cairo, openexr and udev USE flags. These flags are used by
enough amount of packages.
cairo - 11 packages
openexr - 10 packages
udev - 7 packages
Each of these USE flags is used by bigger amount of pa
Matthew Kennedy wrote:
> No one is working on the Scheme herd in Gentoo. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> includes only me, but I'm not doing anything with Scheme and don't
> really care to either.
>
> Several of our Scheme implementations in Portage are out of date,
> (chicken, gambit, drscheme, bigloo and,
On Thursday 26 October 2006 00:57, Alec Warner wrote:
> Caleb Cushing wrote:
> > reporting additions of new programs aren't feasible? or are you
> > referring to version updates and package bumps and such
>
> Reporting removals will be done by treecleaners once I have it implemented.
>
> Report
On Saturday 28 October 2006 08:11, George Shapovalov wrote:
> Which is exactly why these are disallowed. Or at least that was the
> original intention, which (unfortunately) was not enforced strong enough.
> But then, given that we started with *no herds at all*, I don't see how it
> would be poss
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 20:42:14 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > Someone needs to implement the foo; however.
|
| (Not on cvs, but on a normal tree, but maybe works on cvs. There is a
| sanity check by checking that a dir contains at least 1 ebuild)
If the foo were that simple, so
arfrever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:23:50 +0200:
> In connection with latest globalization of mplayer USE flag I would like
> to ask for globalizing cairo, openexr and udev USE flags. These flags are
> used by enough amount of packages.
>
cairo and openexr, good idea, AFAIK. udev has come up before but from
that discussion, the flag means slightly different things in some cases.
Keeping it local allows individual per-pkg descriptions, so where it means
something different, the description can say so. In both meanings, udev
defau
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Thursday 26 October 2006 00:57, Alec Warner wrote:
Caleb Cushing wrote:
reporting additions of new programs aren't feasible? or are you
referring to version updates and package bumps and such
Reporting removals will be done by treecleaners once I have it implemente
Caleb Cushing wrote:
cairo and openexr, good idea, AFAIK. udev has come up before but from
that discussion, the flag means slightly different things in some cases.
Keeping it local allows individual per-pkg descriptions, so where it
means
something different, the description can say so. In b
Hi,
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 19:58:09 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 20:42:14 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | > Someone needs to implement the foo; however.
> |
> | (Not on cvs, but on a normal tree, but maybe works on cvs. There is
> a |
Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 19:58:09 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 20:42:14 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > Someone needs to implement the foo; however.
|
| (Not on cvs, but on a normal tree, but maybe works on cvs.
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:46:30 -0400
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I request that this tag be made optional in the metadata.xml DTD.
>
> While ideally it is beneficial to have every package in a herd, in
> practice this doesn't occur.
>
> 22:28 <@omp> $ herdstat -pq no-herd | wc -l
> 2
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:09:10 -0400
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It doesn't cover updates/. I don't think that corner case is easily
> covered.
Ehm, if you have a list of CP entries that were added/removed and
access to the update files it shouldn't be all that complicated.
Just mad
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 17:12 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> Caleb Cushing wrote:
> >>
> >> cairo and openexr, good idea, AFAIK. udev has come up before but from
> >> that discussion, the flag means slightly different things in some cases.
> >> Keeping it local allows individual per-pkg descriptions, s
# Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (28 Oct 2006)
# Mask the following packages for removal by treecleaners:
# app-emulation/uae for bug(s) 153191, 112675, 140707, 137018
# app-laptop/xpmumon for bug(s) 153198, 112675, 117782
# media-gfx/radiance for bug(s) 106158, 112675
# net-mail/cvm-vmailmgr for
Hello,
I had a timezone change today, which gave me a free hour of life, so of course
I had to do something for gentoo :] Ok, no more pink elephants...
Current qadeps features:
- Checks whether runtime deps of installed package are all set. The check is
going LEVEL-deep, where LEVEL
On Saturday 28 October 2006 22:43, Marius Mauch wrote:
> Well, I'd go further and question the whole herd concept. What benefits
> do we actually gain by having "herds"? For the most part it's just a
> way to associate a package with a mail alias, but for that I don't
> really see the need for this
And that's the problem - the user doesn't know what benefit will it
bring her to use or not use a global USE flag for this particular
package.
yeah and it would be really nice to know these.
I just thought of another useful feature. a flag for emerge that
assumes --verbose but defines what the
maillog: 29/10/2006-05:26:52(+0200): Mart Raudsepp types
>
> The main problem in my eyes here is that with certain USE flags, the
> description doesn't really convey what the user will get.
> Many are in the form of "adds support for this optional thing" instead
> of "by using this optional depend
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 23:00:04 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 28 October 2006 22:43, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > Well, I'd go further and question the whole herd concept. What
> > benefits do we actually gain by having "herds"? For the most part
> > it's just a way to asso
On Sunday 29 October 2006 01:26, Marius Mauch wrote:
> So if now you're on a herd alias but not listed in herds.xml for a herd,
> what practical difference does it make if the herd exists or not?
huh ?
-mike
pgpmO3uG0vGTB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 29 October 2006 01:26, Marius Mauch wrote:
So if now you're on a herd alias but not listed in herds.xml for a herd,
what practical difference does it make if the herd exists or not?
huh ?
-mike
I think one of his points is that you still get the bugmail...I gu
Hello!
Recently new firefox-2.0 was released.
I (and probably many other users) am interested when this new version would
be unmasked and stabilized. If there are any problems, what are they and what
to expect if i would force installation now? Is there any roadmap or timeline
for stabilization al
26 matches
Mail list logo
