Dnia wtorek, 31 października 2006 01:33, Ciaran McCreesh napisał:
> The thing is, at any given time there are probably a hundred or more
> bugs assigned to arch teams with people whining for attention. At least
> two thirds of those whines are unhelpful and serve no purpose.
> Filtering out the leg
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 05:23:50PM +0200, arfrever wrote:
> In connection with latest globalization of mplayer USE flag I would like to
> ask for globalizing cairo, openexr and udev USE flags. These flags are used
> by enough amount of packages.
I vote for a 'libnotify' global USE flag. It is u
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:46:25 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| I'm actually going to agree with jakub here. I wouldn't even say
| they need to fix the bug; but just acknowledge that they even read it
| or paid attention or "hey we are working on it" or "hey we don't give
| a flying ra
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:33:26 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
| > | What on earth are you talking about here? And why almost 6 months
| > | is not enough for someone to respond on a bug with a simple
| > | "we'll only support newer ver
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:33:26 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
| > | What on earth are you talking about here? And why almost 6 months
| > | is not enough for someone to respond on a bug with a simple
| > | "we'll only support newer versions and don't care abou
Everything else below is ugly.
--
Chris White
Gentoo Developer aka:
xx (Scissors Were Here) xx
pgpSSQTAPnIyc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To whomever added the oracle use flag,
Please mask it on all architectures Oracle doesn't support on Linux. Or
better yet, mask it everywhere and only unmask it on the architectures
that support Oracle.
Thanks,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Te
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 22:44 +0100, KLessou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have to make a Live ebuild (from a CVS repository). But econf don't
> find the configure script.
>
> >> !!! no configure script found .
>
> The configure file is into ${WORKDIR}/package/, I have defined ${S}
> here, but no
> Sorry, but this mailing list is not really the best place for "just for
> fun" bash foo. I suggest you take it somewhere else.
Actually that was a question which whitespaces are allowed in IUSE, so I think
it's not the worst place for it. Especially if you count the number of flame
senseless po
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> Just for fun(=I wouldn't use it in ebuild/eclass):
Sorry, but this mailing list is not really the best place for "just for
fun" bash foo. I suggest you take it somewhere else.
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing lis
> And this is the point: Your definition of 'works' is (in my eyes) at
> least sloppy. If it doesn't work for all sensible cases, it shouldn't
> be labelled as 'works'.
Does "dirty portage-specific hack" mean "That's my bulletproof solution for
that problem"? I didn't mean that and I hope that's o
Hello, I have to make a Live ebuild (from a CVS repository). But econf don't find the configure script. >> !!! no configure script found . The configure file is into ${WORKDIR}/package/, I have defined ${S} here, but no result.
Thanks for advance if you have any idea. -- ~| kle
Am Montag, 30. Oktober 2006 22:19 schrieb Piotr Jaroszyński:
> > Whitespace. Not space.
> >
> > E_IUSE=$'foo\tX'
>
> Ok, you are right here. Sorry for saying that you don't know what you
> are talking about, it seems you do. But don't assume that everyone
> else don't. And for future you could be m
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> | What on earth are you talking about here? And why almost 6 months is
> | not enough for someone to respond on a bug with a simple "we'll only
> | support newer versions and don't care about MySQL 4.0.x any more, go
> | drop it"?
>
> Priorities. The arch teams could b
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:46:33 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
| > | As you have might have noticed, they already have a newer version
| > | stable. But apparently asking them to respond on a bug within 5
| > | months is way too much. :P
| >
| > Well yes, sinc
> Whitespace. Not space.
>
> E_IUSE=$'foo\tX'
Ok, you are right here. Sorry for saying that you don't know what you are
talking about, it seems you do. But don't assume that everyone else don't.
And for future you could be more specific, "Doesn't work", esp. If something
do work(not the right wa
Hello Piotr
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 09:40:28PM +0100, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> E_IUSE=${E_IUSE// X } - deletes every X with whitespace around it.
What happens if someone uses newlines, horizontal tabs, vertical tabs or
any other whitespace character instead of spaces? Boom.
Greets,
Michael
--
> E_IUSE=${E_IUSE// X } - deletes every X with whitespace around it.
This should be E_IUSE=${E_IUSE// X / }.
--
Piotr Jaroszyński
Gentoo Developer
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> | As you have might have noticed, they already have a newer version
> | stable. But apparently asking them to respond on a bug within 5 months
> | is way too much. :P
>
> Well yes, since there's no clear link between bugs and packages. Things
> can get stabled incident
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:30:56 +0100 Piotr Jaroszyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Why there is always *someone* who wants to win a pink elephant in the
| last word contest?
We want to be damned sure that neither you nor anyone else is going to
persist with this kind of stupidity.
--
Ciaran McCre
> | > Just what do you think will happen when another eclass sets
> | > IUSE="Xaw3d"?
> |
> | Specially for you and your pink elephants:
> | E_IUSE=${E_IUSE// X }
> | E_IUSE=${E_IUSE#X }
> | E_IUSE=${E_IUSE% X}
>
> No go. Arbitrary whitespace is allowed.
I thought that you really know what you are
> ...yet. Past Portage releases don't have it. Future Portage releases may
> not. Other package managers don't. Using it at all is to intentionally
> screw around with things that ebuilds should not know or need to, is
> asking for trouble, and will have a certain group on your back as soon
> as th
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:50:06 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
| > | > | 5 months of no response from the arches says something is
| > | > | wrong on their side.
| > | >
| > | > Or it tells you where their priorities lie...
| > |
| > | Sure. So they don't nee
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:04:47 +0100 Piotr Jaroszyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > Yes, I do want to bet. You don't have a clue what you're talking
| > about and you don't have a clue how to use bash substitution
| > correctly.
|
| Have you bet that you won't be kicked from gentoo also?
Oh, I thi
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:04:47 +0100
Piotr Jaroszyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just what do you think will happen when Portage internals change?
> > This has happened several times with those variables?
> E_IUSE was added in 2.0.50-r10 or r11 and was never changed.
...yet. Past Portage relea
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> | > | 5 months of no response from the arches says something is wrong on
> | > | their side.
> | >
> | > Or it tells you where their priorities lie...
> |
> | Sure. So they don't need the keywords nor the package.
>
> No no. They might need the package, just not nece
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:09:56 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
| > On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:28:29 -0800 "Robin H. Johnson"
| > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > | To generalize on Francesco's email, how long should developers
| > | wait for minority arches to mark s
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Your solution is approximately on par with fixing a wobbly chair by
sawing off all four legs and then attaching what's left to a crocodile.
+1 for creativity and making me literally laugh out loud
--
Andrew Gaffneyhttp://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffn
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:28:29 -0800 "Robin H. Johnson"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | To generalize on Francesco's email, how long should developers wait
> | for minority arches to mark stuff stable, after a security bug, and
> | then a reminder more than 4 months late
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:21:46 +0100 Piotr Jaroszyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > And it doesn't work.
|
| Wanna bet? Of course you must put it in the x-modular.eclass, but I
| thought that's quite obvious as spyderous was talking about adding
| IUSE="" to that eclass.
Yes, I do want to bet. You
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Monday 30 October 2006 17:26, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> Anyone got any ideas? The only one I have is to add significant missing
>> functionality to font.eclass and switch every font package over that
>> instead of x-modular.eclass.
>
> if [[ ${CATEGORY} == "me
> And it doesn't work.
Wanna bet? Of course you must put it in the x-modular.eclass, but I thought
that's quite obvious as spyderous was talking about adding IUSE="" to that
eclass.
--
Piotr Jaroszyński
Gentoo Developer
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:44:30 +0100 Piotr Jaroszyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > I really want to use font.eclass in x-modular.eclass to get rid of
| > a lot of code duplication and more possible bugs. Problem is, it
| > brings in IUSE=X for every single X package. I cannot figure out
| > how to
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 11:09:53AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 08:28 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote:
> > Wanna guess how many of those happen to be stale?
>
> I would suspect fewer than you think. As an example, I have a few
> packages which belong to no herd, but have
> I really want to use font.eclass in x-modular.eclass to get rid of a lot
> of code duplication and more possible bugs. Problem is, it brings in
> IUSE=X for every single X package. I cannot figure out how to prevent
> this. Setting IUSE="" after the inherit in x-modular.eclass is not enough.
E_IU
On Monday 30 October 2006 17:26, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Anyone got any ideas? The only one I have is to add significant missing
> functionality to font.eclass and switch every font package over that
> instead of x-modular.eclass.
if [[ ${CATEGORY} == "media-font" ]]; then
fonteclass="font"
end
понеділок, 30. жовтень 2006 17:49, Olivier Crete Ви написали:
> > Should we also disallow adding new no-herd/maintainer-needed ebuilds?
> > (As the apparent use of maintainer-needed is to track the ebuilds already
> > in the tree that need some love).
>
> Isn't adding an ebuild without setting ones
On Mon, 2006-30-10 at 17:40 +0100, George Shapovalov wrote:
> понеділок, 30. жовтень 2006 17:16, Chris Gianelloni Ви написали:
> > allow valid devs, and maintainer-needed in maintainer.
> Should we also disallow adding new no-herd/maintainer-needed ebuilds?
> (As the apparent use of maintainer-ne
On Mon, 2006-30-10 at 08:26 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Alternate subject: On the sudden appearance of USE=X for tons of stuff
>
> I really want to use font.eclass in x-modular.eclass to get rid of a lot
> of code duplication and more possible bugs. Problem is, it brings in
> IUSE=X for every
понеділок, 30. жовтень 2006 17:16, Chris Gianelloni Ви написали:
> Well, we enforce the maintainer tag if herd is no-herd. Then, we only
With this explicit requirement I think it should be Ok.
> allow valid devs, and maintainer-needed in maintainer.
Should we also disallow adding new no-herd/ma
Alternate subject: On the sudden appearance of USE=X for tons of stuff
I really want to use font.eclass in x-modular.eclass to get rid of a lot
of code duplication and more possible bugs. Problem is, it brings in
IUSE=X for every single X package. I cannot figure out how to prevent
this. Setting I
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 03:05 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 28 October 2006 02:46, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 08:11:37AM +0200, George Shapovalov wrote:
> > > One of the reasons herds were introduced was to explicitly see what
> > > packages lack maintenance. It
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 08:28 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote:
> Wanna guess how many of those happen to be stale?
I would suspect fewer than you think. As an example, I have a few
packages which belong to no herd, but have me listed as maintainer.
Many of the no-herd packages are the same. Not bei
Matthew Kennedy wrote:
No one is working on the Scheme herd in Gentoo. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
includes only me, but I'm not doing anything with Scheme and don't
really care to either.
Several of our Scheme implementations in Portage are out of date,
(chicken, gambit, drscheme, bigloo and, dare I men
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just a heads up...
This is part of the reason that dbus > .9x is still p.masked.
We are moving from dbus-core back to dbus - dbus will NOT be a meta
package for dbus > .9x. It will be the core daemon. You should be
depending on either just the bin
Tach Christian, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Christian Heim schrieb:
> Its my pleasure to introduce to you Christian Faulhammer (also known as
> opfer), our latest addition helping with xemacs and the x86 monkeys.
Please! Don't! Not XEmacs! Pure GNU Emacs, nothing m
> qlist ${CPV} | scanelf -L -n -q -F '%n #F' | tr , ' ' | xargs qfile -C |
> sort -u
>
> This oneliner does more or less what checkrdeps does ...
Didn't know it's so simple. Idea of my script was to also show on which level
and by what these rdpes are satisfied, which can help keeping your rdeps
On Monday 30 October 2006 14:23, Ferris McCormick wrote:
> I might be mistaken, but I believe sparc responds pretty quickly to
> security bugs, either by taking the requested action or by explaining
> why the requested action is impossible (i.e., build problems).
Yes, the Sparc team is rather quic
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:28:29 -0800 "Robin H. Johnson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| To generalize on Francesco's email, how long should developers wait
| for minority arches to mark stuff stable, after a security bug, and
| then a reminder more than 4 months later?
Indefinitely. There's no harm lea
I wouldn't do it until mplayerplug-in works on it. I just realized it
doesn't, last night. lot of people would probably be upset if it were
stabilized. but they couldn't watch movies.
On 10/29/06, Josh Saddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michal Kurgan wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Recently new firefox-2.0
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 00:28 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 07:49:22PM -0700, Jason Wever wrote:
> > Please triple check what you want to commit and verify that you don't do
> > any of the following (which are punishable by death):
> >
> > 1) remove the last ebuild that i
On 10/30/06, Jason Wever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please triple check what you want to commit and verify that you don't do
any of the following (which are punishable by death):
1) remove the last ebuild that is keyworded for a given arch, especially
when resulting in broken dependencies.
On Monday 30 October 2006 10:26, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> A single person doesn't constitute a team [1]. More than one person
> does...
>
> [1] Unless you're SpanKY.
You forget that vapier also works with SpanKY ;)
--
Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/Linux Developer (baselayout, networkin
As per summary, bpmdj is currently not actively maintained in Gentoo, the
ebuild has a few problems itself, I fixed a few issues before, but I don't
use it nor I can test it myself (-amd64).
If noone steps up, it will removed next month. Stefan, you filed the bump
request, if you're using this
On 29/10/06, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/28/06, Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I'd go further and question the whole herd concept.
It also gives users the impression that there is an entire "team" of
people maintaining a package,when in fact it might be just on
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 07:49:22PM -0700, Jason Wever wrote:
> Please triple check what you want to commit and verify that you don't do
> any of the following (which are punishable by death):
>
> 1) remove the last ebuild that is keyworded for a given arch, especially
>when resulting in broke
56 matches
Mail list logo
