Re: [gentoo-dev] openssh sftplogging patch

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 23:11:09 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 12 November 2006 11:38, Rumi Szabolcs wrote: > > Could anybody please tell what happened? > > it's been integrated upstream so there's no point in having a patch anymore > -mike Shouldn't this be mentioned i

[gentoo-dev] What's the use of mozilla-launcher?

Hello! A while back, I discovered that mozilla-launcher is causing problems, when the URL contains a "," (comma); eg. http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,447923,00.html In Knode/KDE, I configured, that firefox is to be used as the browser, so that when I click on a URL, it's loaded in firefo

Re: [gentoo-dev] openssh sftplogging patch

* Rumi Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-13 09:15]: > On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 23:11:09 -0500 > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sunday 12 November 2006 11:38, Rumi Szabolcs wrote: > > > Could anybody please tell what happened? > > > > it's been integrated upstream so there's no

Re: [gentoo-dev] What's the use of mozilla-launcher?

Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > loaded. Instead of http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,447923,00.html > it would load http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,447923. Reason is, that > firefox executes mozilla-launcher which will eventually run > "mozilla-xremote-client o

[gentoo-dev] Re: What's the use of mozilla-launcher?

Matthew Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > >> loaded. Instead of http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,447923,00.html >> it would load http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,447923. Reason is, >> that >> firefox executes mozilla-launcher w

[gentoo-dev] Re: New developer: Cédric Krier

Petteri Räty wrote: > It's my pleasure to introduce to you Cédric "cedk" Krier. He is joining > us to help with the netmon herd. Previously he has been filling the > bugzilla with new ebuilds and participating in the sunrise overlay. Welcome! Finally some of those many many ebuilds you made will

Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 1.x and GNOME 1.x dependent package masking

Hello I think gtk+1 is very important for embedded profile, and It is very useful. Lorenzo Marussi > Hope you guys aren't seriously considering dropping gtk+1. As long as > we have packages that depend on it (packages that has nothing to do > with gnome herd/team), gtk+1 should stay in th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What's the use of mozilla-launcher?

Hello Alexander On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 04:13:07PM +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote: > ) is not a valid character in a URL, though - or is it? According to RFC2396[1], it is: 2.3. Unreserved Characters Data characters that are allowed in a URI but do not have a reserved purpose are called unr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Resolve build time default editor dependency. (was: How get ebuild provider virtual/category.)

On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:17:37 +0500 "Anatoly Shipitsin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okey. I'm remove all get editor from runtime enviroment EDITOR and > disable --with-editor. The run emerge fcron. I'm got: > > checking for vi... no > configure: error: > Cannot determine path to vi: try option --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Resolve build time default editor dependency. (was: How get ebuild provider virtual/category.)

On Monday 13 November 2006 20:21, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > --with-editor=/bin/nano would do fine. I already CC'd bsd@ on the bug > to figure out if nano is part of their defaults, but it probably does > not matter because BSD does have $(which vi) AFAIK. We are Gentoo in that regard, we don't instal

Re: [gentoo-dev] What's the use of mozilla-launcher?

On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:02:25 +0100, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem with that is, that openURL accepts two parameters and > they are seperated with a ,. So it sees two parameters: > http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,447923 and 00.html - 00.html > is not a valid param

[gentoo-dev] Re: What's the use of mozilla-launcher?

· Thomas de Grenier de Latour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:02:25 +0100, Alexander Skwar > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The problem with that is, that openURL accepts two parameters and >> they are seperated with a ,. So it sees two parameters: >> http://www.spiegel.de/wirtscha

Re: [gentoo-dev] What's the use of mozilla-launcher?

On 11/13/06, Thomas de Grenier de Latour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:02:25 +0100, Alexander Skwar Though, an other reason for not accepting this patch is that some websites may expect URL like this one, which relies on both encoded and raw commas: http://foo.bar/param-1,para

Re: [gentoo-dev] What's the use of mozilla-launcher?

Matthew Kennedy wrote: [Mon Nov 13 2006, 10:05:23AM EST] > I'd be interested to hear what its purpose is exactly. All of the reasons are primarily historical, and I haven't kept track of which still apply and which don't: - separate distribution of the launcher script from the program so that

Re: [gentoo-dev] What's the use of mozilla-launcher?

On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:17:46 -0700, "Richard Fish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/13/06, Thomas de Grenier de Latour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Huh? Both of the following requests are equivalent: > > http://foo.bar/param-1,param-2%2Cwith%2Ccommas,param-3 > http://foo.bar/param-1%2Cpara

Re: [gentoo-dev] Xbox-sources

Mike Frysinger wrote: and is unmaintained. says you :P Following up from IRC earlier: You're interested in maintaining this until a new maintainer is found. Are you prepared to handle the security bugs here? Alternatively we could either put it in hardmask until a maintainer is found, or w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Resolve build time default editor dependency. (was: How get ebuild provider virtual/category.)

Ah, so this happens when no package provides $(which vi)? Then weshould default to something that is universally available. Check  fcron configure.in. Configure get editor from enviroment parameter EDITOR it not set by default vi. --with-editor=/bin/nano would do fine. I already CC'd bsd@ on the bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Resolve build time default editor dependency.

Anatoly Shipitsin wrote: Ah, so this happens when no package provides $(which vi)? Then we should default to something that is universally available. Check fcron configure.in . Configure get editor from enviroment parameter EDITOR it not set by default vi.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Resolve build time default editor dependency.

So USE_EXPAND $Editor and use the flags to figure out what the defaulteditor should be.  Or just set EDITOR so that when fcron builds it finds the editor you used.  You can always emerge fcron with EDITOR=nano andthen unmerge nano and claim fcron is 'broken'.  I think most peoplewouldn't care thoug

Re: [gentoo-dev] Resolve build time default editor dependency.

On Monday 13 November 2006 23:33, Alec Warner wrote: > Then again I'd say > thats a sudo configuration problem, not necessarily a build problem. which is solved by declaring EDITOR as env_keep -mike pgpPOINWwj4Ue.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] openssh sftplogging patch

On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:15:46 +0100 Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In what ChangeLog, the portage package ChangeLog? > Yeah, I also had to look at the OpenSSH ChangeLog to find out that > SFTP logging has been added as a new feature. Yep, of course I meant the openssh package ChangeL