Please give him the usual flamy welcome.
/me hugs Pierre-Yves
--
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
Gentoo Linux Security Team
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Friday 13 July 2007 01:17, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:43:59 -0700
Chrissy Fullam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An additional method discussed was to have all non-dev emails on
a timeout, pick a number of hours, and then the email if not
moderated would be released. (non-dev
On Friday 13 July 2007 03:41, Daniel Ostrow wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 13:24 -0700, Mike Doty wrote:
alot of good stuff snipped
Works for me.
--
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
Gentoo Linux Security Team
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Monday 02 July 2007 21:10, Torsten Veller wrote:
Let me nominate the current council members:
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen jaervosz
YES. When I start on my new job I'll be a lot more online. I'll write some
more before election time. But already now I can say that I will work for
keeping
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
Fact is -dev's volume is getting to the point where it's productivity is
diminishing. Both with dev - dev and dev - world. The entire idea
here is to help correct that and makes things BETTER :)
I hear you. (Although I disagree that there is a relationship
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 18:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
you proposing we rearchitect it all or just for testing purposes before going
live ? i can see both ...
I am proposing rethinking all of it. My current thoughts run something
like this:
arch/amd64
arch/ppc
On Sat, July 14, 2007 8:30 pm, Petteri Räty wrote:
It's a joint pleasure for me and diox to introduce to you Pierre-Yves
py Rofes. Instead of the snake people he will be joining our security
team. Py originates from Paris, France, and has just finished his
studies in computer science. He'll be
On Saturday 14 July 2007 12:13:38 Christian Heim wrote:
The following packages need some love and/or a new maintainer:
Here are some more :|
Previously maintained by Elfyn McBratney (beu):
- app-admin/procinfo
- app-admin/usermin
- app-admin/xtail
- app-doc/howto-html
-
- dev-cpp/Ice (cpp herd ?)
cpp will take that one
- dev-util/cflow
I'll take that one
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 11:27 +0200, Christian Heim wrote:
- media-libs/exiftool (Assigned to graphics and perl)
I'll be happy to take this, I already said as much in the open bugs for
it.
Kind regards,
Hans
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 2007/07/10, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for some flags yes ... for others, i dislike that idea for the exact
same reason for the other profile-based suggestions: these defaults
should live in the ebuild, not the profile
I agree that putting per-package defaults in ebuilds is
Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Sat, 14 Jul 2007 23:54:44 -0400:
I do like the gentoo-politics idea that came up a few weeks ago, which
was to move politics off gentoo-dev and to another list, but I'd view it
from another perspective (and avoid the
Christian Heim wrote:
- dev-tex/hyphen_show (Assigned to tex)
I'll take this; I had originally contributed it in 2005.
Ulrich
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Torsten Veller schrieb:
Let me please point out that no infrastructure team member is
on the list right now.
As infra is often involved in implementing council decisions we should
take care that the information flows. IMHO the easiest way to achieve this
is electing an infra member to the
Will Briggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 15 Jul
2007 17:54:10 +1000:
At the moment gentoo-dev is a one big noisy room forum. This is seen
as a problem
Propose solutions have included:
1) The Let's divide up the room solution - (and so we have
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 03:07:28AM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
As it seems, you do not have the time and/or interest to cleanup the
qmail mess, but don't want anyone to touch (net)qmail ebuilds either, i
have put the updated ebuilds for qmail and friends into my overlay. [1]
You interpret
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tiziano Müller wrote:
Torsten Veller schrieb:
Let me please point out that no infrastructure team member is
on the list right now.
As infra is often involved in implementing council decisions we should
take care that the information flows. IMHO
* Tiziano Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Torsten Veller schrieb:
Let me please point out that no infrastructure team member is
on the list right now.
As infra is often involved in implementing council decisions we should
take care that the information flows. IMHO the easiest way to achieve
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:53:08 +0200
Thomas de Grenier de Latour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007/07/10, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for some flags yes ... for others, i dislike that idea for the exact
same reason for the other profile-based suggestions: these defaults
should
On 2007/07/15, Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:53:08 +0200
Thomas de Grenier de Latour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My point is just that it doesn't work that well with the USE_ORDER
that have been chosen. Even keeping the -* in make.conf case
appart (obviously
Hi,
At the moment, we have a quite problematic situation with the php ebuilds. Due
to various people doing research on php-issues, there has been a vast number
of security issues in the last months (mopb and others).
We still have 5.2.2 in the tree. A user, christian hoffmann, is maintaining
On Sunday 15 July 2007 15:02:45 Hanno Böck wrote:
Hi,
At the moment, we have a quite problematic situation with the php ebuilds.
Due to various people doing research on php-issues, there has been a vast
number of security issues in the last months (mopb and others).
We still have 5.2.2 in
Alle domenica 15 luglio 2007, Ferris McCormick ha scritto:
Here's one I should sleep on -- I didn't:
Not much.
Very few Comments.
I'll start them.
1. Council is just wrong. They are also just gone.
2. I am just wrong. Most likely.
3. Council blew it. They ignore what
3. Council blew it. They ignore what proctors were doing, killed
COC, and
punted..
++
Poor job or rather interests conflict.
On 7/15/07, Ferris McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here's one I should sleep on -- I didn't:
Not much.
Very few
Christina Fullam wrote:
I suppose the problem is high-volume and excessive flaming/trolling/OT.
The proposed solution asks that every developer take an active role,
yes, so that could easily equal more work - but I have little doubts
that there are developers that will take an interest in
On Sunday 15 July 2007 15:02, Hanno Böck wrote:
Christian is doing a quite well job in the overlay. I'd prefer if we could
merge his work into the main tree. I could do that, although I'd prefer to
get some review from other devs. php is a hell to maintain I think.
Christian just provided an
After being bribed with beer from edit_21, welp and a few others I
accept my nomination too.
Thanks
Roy
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Sunday 15 July 2007, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
My point is just that it doesn't work that well with the USE_ORDER that
have been chosen. Even keeping the -* in make.conf case appart
(obviously my opinion on how it should behave was not widely shared, i
can live with that), there is
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:19:08 +0200
Michael Hanselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 03:07:28AM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
As it seems, you do not have the time and/or interest to cleanup the
qmail mess, but don't want anyone to touch (net)qmail ebuilds
either, i have
Christian Heim wrote:
Here are some more :|
Previously maintained by Elfyn McBratney (beu):
- app-doc/howto-html
- app-doc/howto-html-single
- app-doc/single-unix-specification
I'll take these.
--
dirtyepic salesman said this vacuum's guaranteed
gentoo org it
Torsten Veller [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 15 Jul
2007 13:40:29 +0200:
* Tiziano Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Torsten Veller schrieb:
Let me please point out that no infrastructure team member is on the
list right now.
As infra is often involved
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
2007-07-15 21:22:07 Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
On Sunday 15 July 2007, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
the day you switch from IUSE=nocxx to IUSE=+cxx, will you
remember that, as a consequence, you have to fix hardened/2.6/minimal
profile?
On Sunday 15 July 2007, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2007-07-15 21:22:07 Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
On Sunday 15 July 2007, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
the day you switch from IUSE=nocxx to IUSE=+cxx, will you
remember that, as a consequence, you have to fix
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 13:24 -0700, Mike Doty wrote:
All-
We're going to change the -dev mailing list from completely open to where only
devs can post, but any dev could moderate a non-dev post. devs who moderate
in
bad posts will be subject to moderation themselves. in addition the
Resending, as it seems gmail eats my outcoming mail..
Hi Christian.
The corresponding bug is #138059, quoting nattfodd:
The list of software we could add is quite long, too...
Well, looks like the herd did not collect as many packages as it was expected
to do. Considering that, I agree that
Duncan wrote:
I like the gentoo-project (yes, that's better than politics) idea as
well, and believe it /could/ solve the problem here, given a couple
conditions are met.
One, -project is not to be required reading for devs as -dev is. Devs
(and others) can ignore it if they wish.
Two,
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2007-07-15 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
net-firewall/firestarter2007-07-10 21:54:09 mr_bones_
app-emacs/ilisp-cvs 2007-07-12 06:37:54 opfer
app-emacs/ilisp
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
Matthias Langer wrote:
by banning non-dev contributors from this list some of you may feel
better
- but gentoo as a whole will probably suffer. silencing people doesn't
make their opinions invalid.
I keep seeing this argument over and over again. Many people are just
38 matches
Mail list logo
