On Thursday 20 December 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 15:05 Mon 17 Dec , Jim Ramsay (lack) wrote:
> > Added:rox-2.7-r2.ebuild
> >
> > IUSE="+svg +video"
>
> svg already defaults on for all the desktop profiles, so I'm not really
> sure what that's gaining you.
today for a
I have a script coming up that can remove virtual/libc dependencies from
ebuilds automatically but can this be done safely for all ebuilds are
are there ebuilds in system that really need this dep for stage building
etc? Are there other deps to like this that could be removed? At least
sys-libs/zli
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 08:38:10 +0100
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Multiply number of dep types (build, run, install, compile against,
> > post, probably more) by number of requirement levels (required,
> > suggested, recommended) by number of ABI combinations by number of
> > system co
Hi,
Are there any developers who use svgalib and would be interested in
helping out maintenance-wise?
It's currently maintained by Mike (spanky) but he doesn't use it or have
any interest in it - he just looks after it because nobody else does.
I believe he's about to commit the fix for the
There are currently a few issues open with the motif related ebuilds
that need resolving.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=motif
The ones I see as big issues right now (since they are in QA's bug list):
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147067
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bu
Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends in parallel? Is
it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends after the ebuild
process has terminated? Discuss.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2007-12-30 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-libs/libcpml2007-12-27 11:56:48 armin76
dev-libs/libcxml2007-12-27 11:56:50 armin76
dev-lang/ccc
This is a very very rough draft/question about how we should move
forward with USE flag documentation and specification. The entire idea
of a single USE flag having different meanings will need to be revisted
later. I just want to get an idea of how we can document these
different meanings. Plea
On 12/30/07, Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a very very rough draft/question about how we should move
> forward with USE flag documentation and specification. The entire idea
> of a single USE flag having different meanings will need to be revisted
> later. I just want to get an
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
> Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends in parallel? Is
> it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends after the ebuild
> process has terminated? Discuss.
>
Do you/anybody know if they are used in parallel in the tree at the moment?
Regards,
P
On 12/30/07, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends in parallel? Is
> it legal for ebuilds to call has_version and friends after the ebuild
> process has terminated? Discuss.
If the pm implements read/write locking on the underlying dat
Luca Barbato wrote:
> Some items I have in wishlist
>
> - LRDEPEND link runtime dep (I need to link against that in order to run)
I heartily concur with a link dependency, since it's such a fundamental
relationship between packages: if A links to B we need to recompile A when
the ABI for B chang
12 matches
Mail list logo
