On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 23:35 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 14:09:24 +0100
> Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This kind of conversation is not technical at all... Ciaranm, are you
> > a MIPS user? If so, do you think that running KEYWORDS="mips" is less
> > likely
Christian Faulhammer kirjoitti:
Hi,
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 00:35:41 +0100
Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/ypoxyg> is a list of closed security bugs
where mips is still cced. 163 is the total number, where surely
some duplica
Hi,
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 00:35:41 +0100
> Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://tinyurl.com/ypoxyg> is a list of closed security bugs
> > where mips is still cced. 163 is the total number, where surely
> > some duplicates can be found (PH
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-01-06 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
net-proxy/middleman 2007-12-31 22:10:07 solar
dev-embedded/gpio 2007-12-31 22:15:42 solar
app-emacs/md5
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 00:35:41 +0100
Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://tinyurl.com/ypoxyg> is a list of closed security bugs
> where mips is still cced. 163 is the total number, where surely some
> duplicates can be found (PHP, Mozilla products), but we can assume
> that quite
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 14:09:24 +0100
Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This kind of conversation is not technical at all... Ciaranm, are you
> a MIPS user? If so, do you think that running KEYWORDS="mips" is less
> likely to result in breakage than running KEYWORDS="~mips"?
I think you'd
Hi,
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Who knows how long that request would have languished if not for
> > the security bug?
> Who knows indeed... Wouldn't the Council be better served with
> examples where we do know?
http://tinyurl.com/ypoxyg> is a list of closed security bugs where
mip
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 11:36:06 -0600
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How will providing specific examples of how people are being held up
> > not be beneficial to the decision-making process?
>
> First you have to acknowledge that old perpetually open bugs and old
> unmaintained ebuilds ar
Does not build, was already p.masked for a long time:
# Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (24 May 2007)
# Doesn't compile atm. See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164074
# for more details.
=app-text/jasperreports-1.0.1
Moved to java junkyard. Could be added back to tree when bumped and
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
"Caleb Tennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If anyone has any examples of where they really are being held back
and where they really have given the arch teams plenty of time to do
something, I'd like to see them... Somehow I doubt it happens very
often, if at all.
Why? Yo
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> Might as well toss a coin or check the phase of the moon...
Forgot those and dropping mips from the main repo as whole, yes.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo Council Member
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
+# Markus Ullmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06 Jan 2008)
+# Broken on compilation, pending removal
+# see bug 192627 for details
+net-analyzer/driftnet
+
Greetz
-Jokey
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Santiago M. Mola wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2008 11:40 AM, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 10:18 +, Richard Brown wrote:
>> > While this thread remains highly entertaining, I'm sure as a past
>> > gentoo developer Roy remembers that we don't generally use gentoo-dev
>>
On Sunday 06 of January 2008 13:04:13 Luca Barbato wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:19:10 +0100
> >
> > Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> PS: has anybody checked how viable is now qemu-system ?
> >
> > Testing on qemu isn't anything like testing on real hardware
Roy Marples wrote:
> So, the question is, do we want to maintain one massive KV_to_int that
> has different code paths for uname -s output, or get function.sh to
> include an OS specific file we supply just for this one function?
>
> Or just put the function in modules-update and udev as they are
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 09:12 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:08:47 +0100
> "Denis Dupeyron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No. What he meant and doesn't dare to say is you didn't ask, but
> > demanded, in your usual dry and pesky "I'm a spoiled 6-year old" tone.
> > And this a
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:19:10 +0100
> Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> PS: has anybody checked how viable is now qemu-system ?
>
> Testing on qemu isn't anything like testing on real hardware. It's not
> a reliable or useful way of doing arch work.
>
We ALL know
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:51:35PM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Topic of #gentoo-dev will be updated with status as usual, and a
> completion or abort mail will be sent to gentoo-dev.
Ok, it all went fine, after one VERP hickup.
If anybody sees a mailing list losing mail, please leave a detail
В Сбт, 05/01/2008 в 18:17 -0600, Ryan Hill пишет:
> I don't know, I can kinda see both sides. Alt arches tend to be finicky
> so it's important that updates are well tested on them. Also they're
> more prone to break during upgrades, not only because they're more
> fragile but because upstream
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:08:47 +0100
"Denis Dupeyron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No. What he meant and doesn't dare to say is you didn't ask, but
> demanded, in your usual dry and pesky "I'm a spoiled 6-year old" tone.
> And this as usual results in people ignoring you. People aren't as
> stupid as
On Jan 6, 2008 1:33 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 09:03:43 -0500 (EST)
> "Caleb Tennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If anyone has any examples of where they really are being held back
> > > and where they really have given the arch teams plenty of time to
21 matches
Mail list logo
