Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 17:11 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
If there are no objections then I don't so any reason not to go ahead and add
the manifest1_obsolete sometime in the near future. Thoughts?
Let's do it. I look forward to a lot less inodes on my disks.
Let's schedule
Le dimanche 27 janvier 2008 à 17:44 -0800, Chris Gianelloni a écrit :
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 17:11 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
If there are no objections then I don't so any reason not to go ahead
and add
the manifest1_obsolete sometime in the near future. Thoughts?
Let's do it. I look
Zac Medico a écrit :
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Related to the top level of the tree, can we get a release of repoman
that detects if a checkout is a subset only (eg no top level), for folk
that have subtree checkouts only? (Probably look for skel.*/profile
items two levels up).
I think we
now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils and integrated
straight into coreutils, perhaps it's time to ask how important this package
is to everyone. current debianutils is part of system and provides:
- installkernel
- run-parts
- tempfile
- savelog
- mkboot
do people
On Jan 28, 2008 2:44 AM, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think throwing up an announcement today/tomorrow for Thursday/Friday
should be sufficient for this sort of a change, as it won't affect any
user who has a version of portage released in the past ~1.5 years.
+1, too.
--
On 28-01-2008 07:23:18 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
do people consider these things critical ? i dont know the last time i
personally needed/wanted any of these ...
Given that it needs a jumbo patch to compile on non-GNU/Linux systems
lacking GNU getopt, I wouldn't mind if it would get
Mike Frysinger a écrit :
do people consider these things critical ? i dont know the last time i
personally needed/wanted any of these ...
I for one didn't even know what tools it provided ... let alone what I
might use them for.
Rémi
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:23:18 -0500
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils and
integrated straight into coreutils, perhaps it's time to ask how
important this package is to everyone. current debianutils is part
of system and
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 28 Jan
2008 07:23:18 -0500:
current debianutils is part of system and provides:
- installkernel
- mkboot
do people consider these things critical ? i dont know the last time i
personally needed/wanted
Duncan wrote:
At minimum, I'd say make the usual BIG WARNING NOISES in the usual
places, and probably still expect complaints. It may still be worth
doing to cut down on system size... or not, depending on where the system
size vs. inevitable complaints comes down. (FWIW, it's precisely this
Hallo,
Please write in English, not everybody speaks German.
Christian Faulhammer pisze:
Hallo,
Dirk Spiekermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Die IPSec-tools und Openswan habe ich schon neu emerged. Auch die
neue Option Authenc support im Kernel habe ich aktiviert.
OpenSwan ist
Mike Frysinger wrote:
now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils and integrated
straight into coreutils, perhaps it's time to ask how important this package
is to everyone. current debianutils is part of system and provides:
- installkernel
- run-parts
- tempfile
-
Yuri Vasilevski kirjoitti:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:23:18 -0500
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils and
integrated straight into coreutils, perhaps it's time to ask how
important this package is to everyone. current debianutils is
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:23:18AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils and integrated
straight into coreutils, perhaps it's time to ask how important this package
is to everyone. current debianutils is part of system and provides:
-
Krzysiek Pawlik kirjoitti:
Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
I would say drop it from system and add to RDEPEND in kernel-2.eclass
for ${ETYPE} == sources.
IMHO that's a bad idea - everybody use some kernel sources, but not
everybody runs `make install'. I'm for dropping debianutils from system.
Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
I would say drop it from system and add to RDEPEND in kernel-2.eclass
for ${ETYPE} == sources.
IMHO that's a bad idea - everybody use some kernel sources, but not everybody
runs `make install'. I'm for dropping debianutils from system.
--
Krzysiek Pawlik nelchael at
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:59:39 +0200
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BSD, prefix etc. I would say breaking make install is worse than
requiring people to keep debianutils installed. They can just use
package.provided if they want to get rid of it.
...which then breaks things that have a
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:59:39 +0200 Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Krzysiek Pawlik kirjoitti:
Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
I would say drop it from system and add to RDEPEND in kernel-2.eclass
for ${ETYPE} == sources.
IMHO that's a bad idea - everybody use some kernel sources, but not
Hi arches,
just to let you know that I will start marking above monster stable on
Wednesday 30 Jan 2008 from 0800 CET for x86. Please leave the
kde-base category alone for some hours.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/, #gentoo-lisp on
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:59:39 +0200
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BSD, prefix etc. I would say breaking make install is worse than
requiring people to keep debianutils installed. They can just use
package.provided if they want to get rid of it.
...which then
Mateusz Mierzwinski pisze:
Hallo,
Please write in English, not everybody speaks German.
Christian Faulhammer pisze:
Hallo,
Dirk Spiekermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Die IPSec-tools und Openswan habe ich schon neu emerged. Auch die
neue Option Authenc support im Kernel habe ich aktiviert.
Hallo,
Dirk Spiekermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Die IPSec-tools und Openswan habe ich schon neu emerged. Auch die
neue Option Authenc support im Kernel habe ich aktiviert.
OpenSwan ist mittlerweile in Version 2.4.11 (nicht in
Portage) erschienen, eventuell ist die Version angepasst.
V-Li
--
# Alexis Ballier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (28 Jan 2008)
# Provided by all our TeX distributions and thus
# collides with them. Bug #153168
# Masked for removal, due some day after 28 Feb 2008
dev-tex/koma-script
Alexis.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Duncan wrote:
Mainstream kernel's default make install uses /sbin/installkernel if it
exists, so I've been using it, invoking the kernel's make install from my
own kernel scripts. installkernel invokes mkboot...
We (the docs team) have never suggested out users to run `make install`
for
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:43:38 +0100
Matthias B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's wrong with making it an optional dependency? Something like a
useflag
Because if this would be done consistently we'd end up with several
thousand use flags long term, not really what I'd call managable.
Remi (or rane.. or some other r- dev ;]) was asking a couple days ago how to
write a package.mask entry for removals so the script picks it up. Actually
there is no script (just me), and there's no real rules. but I thought I'd
mention a couple things that would make life easier.
In your
Okay, this is my first attempt at writing an eclass, so comments are
welcome.
First of all, here's the background. Sword modules are currently lumped
together in one general package (sword-modules), when it would be
simpler and easier to track them by having them as individual packages,
27 matches
Mail list logo
