Andrew D Kirch wrote:
Obviously the software needs to work, and therefore we need patches, but
Gentoo has not done enough to date to get them pushed upstream. Lets
look at some cringeworthy statistics on outstanding patches.
Have you even _looked_ at the patches? Can you tell which ones are :
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Andrew D Kirch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
Looks like you counted the number of files in the files/
subdirectories. Not all of these are patches. Also, you probably
forgot to count seds, as some of us use sed more than patches.
Oh, and like Jeremy was hinting
On 14:12 Fri 01 Aug , Ferris McCormick wrote:
> Required ethical disclaimer: I provide this only for information. It
> is not a legal opinion, nor am I qualified to give a legal opinion on
> international privacy laws. I will go so far as to say that the
> Freenode privacy statement looks as
On 23:17 Thu 31 Jul , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> This is your friendly reminder! Same bat time (typically the 2nd/4th
> Thursdays at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
> irc.freenode.net) !
>
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote
> on, le
Andrew D Kirch wrote:
[...patches...]
Common practice is to work with upstream (if alive) and have the patches
merged asap. Nothing _that_ strange IMHO.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo Council Member
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
Josh Saddler wrote:
> XML doesn't put a space between the attribute and the closing slash --
> XHTML does. Common mistake. Also, use " for attributes, rather than '.
Nope, both is perfectly legal in XML (and illegal per the GDP coding
style, which certainly doesn't apply to metadata.xml) :p.
Chee
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Andrew D Kirch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>>
>> Andrew D Kirch wrote:
>>
>>
>> Good points, I take it that you have found a mentor and are becoming a dev
>> to drive this project then?
>>
>> -Jeremy
>
> I've spoken in the past with both Elfyn
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Andrew D Kirch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Patches in the metadata.xml should have some sort of status tracking for
> each patch, repoman should flag any that don't, and warn on any that have
> not been submitted upstream unless the status is signed off on by a h
On 03:01 Thu 14 Aug , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 23:17 Thu 31 Jul , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > This is your friendly reminder! Same bat time (typically the 2nd/4th
> > Thursdays at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
> > irc.freenode.net) !
> >
> > If you have someth
On 03:01 Thu 14 Aug , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Here's a rough agenda. I'll hash it out a bit more a few hours in
> advance of the meeting. Basically, council members haven't responded to
> these items on the mailing list, and that's what needs to happen.
For all of the items below, here's wh
Am Donnerstag, 14. August 2008 17:24:41 schrieb Santiago M. Mola:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Andrew D Kirch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Patches in the metadata.xml should have some sort of status tracking for
> > each patch, repoman should flag any that don't, and warn on any that have
>
2008/8/14 Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Why aren't fired developers banned from the channels where they
>> displayed this behavior?
Isn't this one effectively withdrawn? I asked yngwin which devs he
was referring to, and he said there weren't any, so is there anything
left to discuss?
Hello everybody,
I recently noticed, that there are two imlibs in the tree, media-libs/imlib
and media-libs/imlib2.
There are also two corresponding useflags, imlib and imlib2, while imlib is
a global useflag and imlib2 a local one.
At the moment of writing, a total of 48 ebuilds in the tree use on
David Leverton wrote:
> 2008/8/14 Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Why aren't fired developers banned from the channels where they
>>> displayed this behavior?
>
> Isn't this one effectively withdrawn? I asked yngwin which devs he
> was referring to, and he said there weren't any, so is t
"Benedikt Morbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:56:16 +0200:
> Possible solutions include: (sorted by necessary effort) 1. Leaving
> everything like it is (not a real solution) 2. Removing the imlib2
> useflag 3. Changing the 24 ebuilds dep
Rémi Cardona wrote:
Andrew D Kirch wrote:
Obviously the software needs to work, and therefore we need patches, but
Gentoo has not done enough to date to get them pushed upstream. Lets
look at some cringeworthy statistics on outstanding patches.
Have you even _looked_ at the patches? Can you te
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Andrew D Kirch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
Looks like you counted the number of files in the files/
subdirectories. Not all of these are patches. Also, you probably
forgot to count seds, as some of us use sed more than patches.
Oh, and
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:55:12AM -0400, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
> Here's the script that I used to generate this. I have not manually
> reviewed all of thousands of patches to determine the unique situation of
> each patch, however I would like a suggestion on how to demonstrate _real_
> statis
Andrew D Kirch wrote:
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Andrew D Kirch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[...]
Looks like you counted the number of files in the files/
subdirectories. Not all of these are patches. Also, you probably
forgot to count seds, as some of us use sed mor
19 matches
Mail list logo
