Petteri Räty posted on Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:25:07 +0200 as excerpted:
> n my opinion python-3 should go stable when there's enough ebuilds
> needing it as a dependency. It doesn't need to nowhere near 90% of
> python packages in the tree.
Indeed.
Given that it's slotted and (barring bugs) won't i
On 03/07/2010 11:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 07 March 2010 14:08:29 Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 03/07/2010 08:36 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Sunday 07 March 2010 13:31:56 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 03/07/2010 07:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 06 March 2010 02:11:15
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 09:08:14PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:11:47 -0500
> Mark Loeser wrote:
>
> > > Has QA given their blessing to this?
> >
> > Absolutely not. Its actually the opposite. Until 90+% of the tree just
> > works with the new version of python, it should no
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 12:16:24 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
> While you're touching this, could you improve this part a bit:
>
> # maybe the user is screwing around with perms they shouldnt #289168
> if [[ ! -r ${base} ]] ; then
> eerror "Unable to read ${base} -- perms are screwed ?"
> die
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 21:39:32 -0500
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 February 2010 12:03:16 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > If no one objects, I will look forward to committing the patch in a
> > week or two.
>
> commit it already :p
Thanks for the reminder. In the same commit have also made the
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:09:28 +
David Leverton wrote:
> On Saturday 06 March 2010 15:26:10 Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
> > Well, I personally would prefer to have two keywords at least, one for
> > candidates and another for confirmed bugs.
>
> This sounds like the sort of thing Bugzilla's "flags
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:11:47 -0500
Mark Loeser wrote:
> > Has QA given their blessing to this?
>
> Absolutely not. Its actually the opposite. Until 90+% of the tree just
> works with the new version of python, it should not be stabilized. The
> stable tree should all Just Work together. Stabi
On Thursday 04 March 2010 16:52:50 Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> Hello
> I have managed to split the desktop profile to gnome and kde submenus. The
> result can be found in kde-crazy overlay (not in layman) [1]
> I splitted every desktop/ folder i found. The following issues raised
> though: 1) I didn
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2010-03-07 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-libs/libredblack2010-03-01 12:05:12 ssuominen
net-libs/libnemesi 2010-03-01 12:09:43 ssuominen
dev-util/git
On Sunday 07 March 2010 14:08:29 Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 03/07/2010 08:36 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sunday 07 March 2010 13:31:56 Petteri Räty wrote:
> >> On 03/07/2010 07:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> On Saturday 06 March 2010 02:11:15 Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 03/05/2010 08:59 PM
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:26:24 +0200
Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 03/07/2010 07:32 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > no need to stabilize experimental python, not even convinced it should
> > be in ~arch yet (but package.masked for testing)
> I don't think upstream considers python 3 experimental so when i
On 03/07/2010 08:36 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 07 March 2010 13:31:56 Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 03/07/2010 07:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Saturday 06 March 2010 02:11:15 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 03/05/2010 08:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> sometimes i have optional patches
On Sunday 07 March 2010 13:31:56 Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 03/07/2010 07:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 06 March 2010 02:11:15 Petteri Räty wrote:
> >> On 03/05/2010 08:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> sometimes i have optional patches (ignoring the "patches should always
> >>> be ap
On 03/07/2010 07:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 06 March 2010 02:11:15 Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 03/05/2010 08:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> sometimes i have optional patches (ignoring the "patches should always be
>>> applied") where autotools should be run. always inheriting autot
On 03/07/2010 07:32 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
> +1
>
> no need to stabilize experimental python, not even convinced it should
> be in ~arch yet (but package.masked for testing)
>
I don't think upstream considers python 3 experimental so when it can be
installed side by side with 2.6 so that
On 03/07/2010 07:11 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
>
> Absolutely not. Its actually the opposite. Until 90+% of the tree just
> works with the new version of python, it should not be stabilized. The
> stable tree should all Just Work together. Stabilizing python-3 at this
> point would be the equivale
On Sunday 07 March 2010 13:59:25 ChIIph wrote:
> On 03/07/10 14:50, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sunday 07 March 2010 12:54:34 ChIIph wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >> The commas are only added when there's LDFLAGS being changed.
> >
> > you missed my point. read the whole eclass -- this function isnt only
On 03/07/10 14:50, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 07 March 2010 12:54:34 ChIIph wrote:
>
>> [snip]
>> The commas are only added when there's LDFLAGS being changed.
>>
> you missed my point. read the whole eclass -- this function isnt only used
> on
> LDFLAGS. your patch opens the doo
On Sunday 07 March 2010 12:54:34 ChIIph wrote:
> On 03/06/10 23:27, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 24 February 2010 15:27:21 ChIIph wrote:
> >> Here are some minor changes I'd like to propose to flag-o-matic's
> >> _filter-var() to work properly with LDFLAGS.
> >> Without this, things like
On Saturday 06 March 2010 02:11:15 Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 03/05/2010 08:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > sometimes i have optional patches (ignoring the "patches should always be
> > applied") where autotools should be run. always inheriting autotools is
> > currently annoying because it always
On 03/07/2010 07:11 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Sebastian Pipping said:
>> On 03/04/10 19:22, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>>> All problems, which were blocking stabilization of Python 3, have been
>>> fixed.
>>> Stabilization of Python 3.1.2 is currently scheduled on 2010-04-19.
>>
>>
Sebastian Pipping said:
> On 03/04/10 19:22, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> > All problems, which were blocking stabilization of Python 3, have been
> > fixed.
> > Stabilization of Python 3.1.2 is currently scheduled on 2010-04-19.
>
> #python on Freenode still reads "It's too earl
On 03/06/10 23:27, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 February 2010 15:27:21 ChIIph wrote:
>
>> Here are some minor changes I'd like to propose to flag-o-matic's
>> _filter-var() to work properly with LDFLAGS.
>> Without this, things like "-Wl,-O1,--as-needed" won't be affected by any
>> ki
On Sunday 07 March 2010 04:30:55 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> What I wonder now is:
> - Will it work with our very instance of Bugzilla?
The security team uses (or at least has used in the past) flags on Gentoo
Bugzilla.
> - Can certain flag states be required when searching?
It looks like you ne
Le 01/03/2010 11:38, Samuli Suominen a écrit :
> I'd prefer EAUTORECONF (as it's already used in xfconf.eclass for the
> same purpose, and has no reason to differ) or even SNAPSHOT, but XORG_
> prefix seems redudant
We decided to put the prefix to make things clearer for ebuild writers
and to make
From ubuntu-bugs-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com Sun Mar 07 02:25:46 2010
Return-path:
Envelope-to: arch...@mail-archive.com
Delivery-date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 02:25:46 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx284.postini.com ([64.18.0.108] helo=psmtp.com)
by mail-archive.com with smtp (Exim 4.69)
(e
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 07-03-2010 01:19:49 -0600, Dale wrote:
Fabian Groffen wrote:
# Fabian Groffen (06 Mar 2010)
# Masked for security issues and discontinued interest from upstream to
# support non-Windows platforms. Bug #233928
# Pending removal on April 6, 2010
app-antivirus
On 07-03-2010 01:19:49 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > # Fabian Groffen (06 Mar 2010)
> > # Masked for security issues and discontinued interest from upstream to
> > # support non-Windows platforms. Bug #233928
> > # Pending removal on April 6, 2010
> > app-antivirus/f-prot
>
> I
28 matches
Mail list logo
