> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 07:31:10PM +1300, Alistair Bush wrote:
> > > On Saturday 27 of March 2010 21:58:41 William Hubbs wrote:
> > >
> > > It's really freaking silly to wait months for stabilization of some
> > > random php/perl library that's known to work.
> >
> > Have you ever just consider
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 07:31:10PM +1300, Alistair Bush wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 of March 2010 21:58:41 William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > It's really freaking silly to wait months for stabilization of some random
> > php/perl library that's known to work.
>
> Have you ever just considered closing the
> On Saturday 27 of March 2010 21:58:41 William Hubbs wrote:
>
> It's really freaking silly to wait months for stabilization of some random
> php/perl library that's known to work.
Have you ever just considered closing the stabilization bug and ignoring the
arch. If they take so long to mark yo
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 01:03:43AM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> I seriously hate changing USE flags for the sake of changing use
> flags. This provides a moderate amount of annoyance for anyone that
> maintains more then one Gentoo box because they need to then tinker
> with their /etc/make.conf
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 03/24/2010 08:30 PM, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
>
>> For qemu-kvm the problem is that there is only one implementation (i.e.
>> gnutls), and if I want to have ssl support I have to enable gnutls for
>> this package.
>
> In this case the ebuil
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> See this thread for background:
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_0673a33fe75961e510872fd2c1044ced.xml
>
> I think we should go through all the ssl use flag using packages and
> unify the use flag descriptions and behavior to the fol
On Saturday 27 of March 2010 21:58:41 William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:45:51PM +0100, Torsten Veller wrote:
> > * Petteri R?ty :
> > > So let's summarize for assigning to the single arch:
> > >
> > > In support (and my comments in support):
> > > - Can be used as a gentle reminde
I was just thinking how nice it could be if we acknowledged some of the
projects that contribute to gentoo but are actually developed primarily
outside of gentoo's dev community. How about a page on gentoo.org
So lets me start with a couple of obvious ones.
kportagetray
pkgcore
paludis
There
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:45:51PM +0100, Torsten Veller wrote:
> * Petteri R?ty :
> > So let's summarize for assigning to the single arch:
>
> > In support (and my comments in support):
> > - Can be used as a gentle reminder for slacker arches
>
> And if not "only one arch" or "single arch" is
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 05:27:46PM +, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:28:29 +, Alec Warner
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Dale wrote:
>
> >> As a user, I still think this could turn into a real mess. ??I think
> there
> >> will be quite a few that will see
Alec Warner wrote:
> Could we generate a bugzilla search for arch teams? Do arch teams
> already use existing bugzilla functionality?
At least when i was with the ppc team, we had a bugzie search. And
bugzie already sorts your query for you. I guess it could be made to
only show keyword=STABLEREQ
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Torsten Veller wrote:
> * Petteri Räty :
>> So let's summarize for assigning to the single arch:
>
>> In support (and my comments in support):
>> - Can be used as a gentle reminder for slacker arches
>
> And if not "only one arch" or "single arch" is slacking?
> I
* Petteri Räty :
> So let's summarize for assigning to the single arch:
> In support (and my comments in support):
> - Can be used as a gentle reminder for slacker arches
And if not "only one arch" or "single arch" is slacking?
I guess you would find another gentle way to remind them.
How abou
On 03/27/2010 04:51 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
>
> The only reason I don't really like this is because it breaks
> consistency. We have a ground rule, assign to maintainer, CC arch(es).
> Why make it more complicated? I have a feeling people will continue
> CCing arches out of habit.
>
I don't thi
See this thread for background:
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_0673a33fe75961e510872fd2c1044ced.xml
I think we should go through all the ssl use flag using packages and
unify the use flag descriptions and behavior to the following standing
policy (handed down probably):
1) packages alw
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 04:26:46PM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 03/12/2010 09:18 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
> > bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in
> > question but there's a difference of op
On 03/24/2010 08:30 PM, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
> For qemu-kvm the problem is that there is only one implementation (i.e.
> gnutls), and if I want to have ssl support I have to enable gnutls for
> this package.
In this case the ebuild should have only ssl use flag.
> When I wrote a bug about th
On 03/12/2010 09:18 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
> bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in
> question but there's a difference of opinion here:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=272160#c5
> Let's
18 matches
Mail list logo
