Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2010/2011 - Nominations are now open

2010-06-06 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 05/06/2010 в 02:00 +0200, Torsten Veller пишет: > Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2010/2011 are now open for the next > two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2010). > > All nominations must be sent to the gentoo-dev mailing list. If you > were nominated and want to run, you have to accept yo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Alec Warner
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > Am 06.06.2010 15:44, schrieb Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis: >> 2010-06-06 12:40:28 Thomas Sachau napisał(a): >>> Additionally, it should define the supported slots, something like this: >>> >>> SUPPORTED_RUBY_SLOTS="1.8 1.9" or >>> SUPPO

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Brian Harring
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 01:35:55PM +, Domen Koooar wrote: > On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 14:41 +0200, Thomas Sachau wrote: > > Am 06.06.2010 13:50, schrieb Domen Kožar: > > >> And if you add a python slot or remove one, portage currently is not > > >> able to see that and to > > >> reinstall packages

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2010-06-06 23h59 UTC

2010-06-06 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2010-06-06 23h59 UTC. Removals: app-text/manedit2010-06-01 15:49:30 fuzzyray dev-java/odfdom-bin 2010-06-03 11:19:46 ali_bush app-mobilephon

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 12:40 +0200, Thomas Sachau wrote: > Every package defines the language(s), where it could be installed for > multiple slots, e.g.: > > MULTI_SLOT="python" or > MULTI_SLOT="python ruby" > > Additionally, it should define the supported slots, something like this: > > SUPPOR

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-06-06 15:54:23 Thomas Sachau napisał(a): > Am 06.06.2010 15:44, schrieb Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis: > > 2010-06-06 12:40:28 Thomas Sachau napisał(a): > >> Additionally, it should define the supported slots, something like this: > >> > >> SUPPORTED_RUBY_SLOTS="1.8 1.9" or > >> SUPPORTE

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Thomas Sachau
Am 06.06.2010 15:44, schrieb Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis: > 2010-06-06 12:40:28 Thomas Sachau napisał(a): >> Additionally, it should define the supported slots, something like this: >> >> SUPPORTED_RUBY_SLOTS="1.8 1.9" or >> SUPPORTED_PYTHON_SLOTS="2.5 2.6 3.0 3.1" >> >> Now the package man

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Thomas Sachau
Am 06.06.2010 15:35, schrieb Domen Kožar: > On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 14:41 +0200, Thomas Sachau wrote: >> Am 06.06.2010 13:50, schrieb Domen Kožar: And if you add a python slot or remove one, portage currently is not able to see that and to reinstall packages, which had modules install

[gentoo-dev] Extending EAPI="4"

2010-06-06 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
I would like to suggest that EAPI="4" be reopened for ability of using dots in USE flag names, which was suggested in bug #311795. -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-06-06 12:40:28 Thomas Sachau napisał(a): > Additionally, it should define the supported slots, something like this: > > SUPPORTED_RUBY_SLOTS="1.8 1.9" or > SUPPORTED_PYTHON_SLOTS="2.5 2.6 3.0 3.1" > > Now the package manager should take those vars and convert them to some > expanded USE var

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Domen Kožar
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 14:41 +0200, Thomas Sachau wrote: > Am 06.06.2010 13:50, schrieb Domen Kožar: > >> And if you add a python slot or remove one, portage currently is not able > >> to see that and to > >> reinstall packages, which had modules installed for that slot. You need > >> another tool

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Thomas Sachau
Am 06.06.2010 13:50, schrieb Domen Kožar: >> And if you add a python slot or remove one, portage currently is not able to >> see that and to >> reinstall packages, which had modules installed for that slot. You need >> another tool >> (python-updater) to check that and to call the needed reinstal

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Thomas Sachau
Am 06.06.2010 13:50, schrieb Domen Kožar: >> The current python eclass also uses some vars to specify the supported >> slots, yes, but it is more >> complex and harder to maintain in addition to the fact, that the dependency >> part is hidden from the >> package manager. >> >> I dont think, that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Domen Kožar
> The current python eclass also uses some vars to specify the supported slots, > yes, but it is more > complex and harder to maintain in addition to the fact, that the dependency > part is hidden from the > package manager. > > I dont think, that you can tell portage with the current implementa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 06/06/2010 02:08, Sebastian Pipping a écrit : > can you explain how that happens? Standard dependency resolution for packages with slots, there's nothing specific about python. Cheers, Rémi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Thomas Sachau
Am 06.06.2010 13:09, schrieb Matti Bickel: > On 06/06/2010 12:40 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: >> My base proposal for this is something like this: >> >> Every package defines the language(s), where it could be installed for >> multiple slots, e.g.: >> >> MULTI_SLOT="python" or >> MULTI_SLOT="python ru

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Thomas Sachau
Am 06.06.2010 09:37, schrieb Michał Górny: > On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 04:19:28 +0200 > Sebastian Pipping wrote: > >> Thomas, >> >> >> On 06/06/10 04:01, Thomas Sachau wrote: >>> Since python-3* is currently useless and not required for any >>> package, the dependency should by default only pull in pyt

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Dale
Michał Górny wrote: On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 04:19:28 +0200 Sebastian Pipping wrote: Thomas, On 06/06/10 04:01, Thomas Sachau wrote: not required by any package and by default not used by any package? That a question I haven't seen answered before, either. Arfrever?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Matti Bickel
On 06/06/2010 12:40 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > My base proposal for this is something like this: > > Every package defines the language(s), where it could be installed for > multiple slots, e.g.: > > MULTI_SLOT="python" or > MULTI_SLOT="python ruby" > > Additionally, it should define the suppor

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Thomas Sachau
Am 06.06.2010 08:36, schrieb Graham Murray: > Thomas Sachau writes: > >> Since python-3* is currently useless and not required for any package, the >> dependency should by >> default only pull in python-2* like this: >> >> =dev-lang/python-2* >> >> With that, the default way would not pull in a

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] toolchain-funcs.eclass: functions to call compiler

2010-06-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 00:17:27 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > i'm not saying `emake` covers all solutions you proposed, just that > the base usage isnt nearly as bleak. there are some cases where > having a wrapper around emake would be useful (such as compiling > multiple files or linking things in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 04:19:28 +0200 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Thomas, > > > On 06/06/10 04:01, Thomas Sachau wrote: > > [..] so even if it is not pulled in during installation, it will be > > pulled in during world update. > > sounds right. Preventing this requires either masking or a > dont-