* Theo Chatzimichos :
> For the record, Kacper told me today that every developer is allowed to touch
> ppc/ppc64 profiles. Archies that don't want others to touch their profiles
> should mention it in the devmanual. I was not aware of that, I thought that
> !arch member is not allowed to touch
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 23:34:07 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 11:01 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nikos Chantziaras:
> >> On 02/02/2011 10:30 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
> >>> W dniu 02.02.2011 08:59, Nikos Chantziaras pisze:
> It seems that KDE 4.6 is still
On 02/02/2011 11:01 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi,
Nikos Chantziaras:
On 02/02/2011 10:30 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
W dniu 02.02.2011 08:59, Nikos Chantziaras pisze:
It seems that KDE 4.6 is still hard-masked for x86 and amd64
because it's waiting for ppc and ppc64 keywords. I believe i
Hi,
Nikos Chantziaras :
> On 02/02/2011 10:30 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
> > W dniu 02.02.2011 08:59, Nikos Chantziaras pisze:
> >> It seems that KDE 4.6 is still hard-masked for x86 and amd64
> >> because it's waiting for ppc and ppc64 keywords. I believe it
> >> would be beneficial for people if
# Hans de Graaff (02 Feb 2011)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Superseded by
# dev-libs/Ice[ruby].
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 02/02/2011 10:30 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
W dniu 02.02.2011 08:59, Nikos Chantziaras pisze:
It seems that KDE 4.6 is still hard-masked for x86 and amd64 because
it's waiting for ppc and ppc64 keywords. I believe it would be
beneficial for people if they wouldn't have to wait for arches that
W dniu 02.02.2011 08:59, Nikos Chantziaras pisze:
> It seems that KDE 4.6 is still hard-masked for x86 and amd64 because
> it's waiting for ppc and ppc64 keywords. I believe it would be
> beneficial for people if they wouldn't have to wait for arches that
> don't affect them at all.
>
> It seems
