On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 08:19 +0200, Xavier Miller wrote:
> Quoting Theo Chatzimichos :
>
> > Finished, everything seems fine again. Please let us know if you
> > notice any weird behavior
>
>
> Hello,
>
> When I want to see an attachment, the URL becomes
> https://#bug_od#.b.g.o and I need to
Quoting Xavier Miller :
Quoting Theo Chatzimichos :
Finished, everything seems fine again. Please let us know if you
notice any weird behavior
Hello,
When I want to see an attachment, the URL becomes
https://#bug_od#.b.g.o and I need to register the certificate for
every bug.
Xavier
Quoting Theo Chatzimichos :
Finished, everything seems fine again. Please let us know if you
notice any weird behavior
Hello,
When I want to see an attachment, the URL becomes
https://#bug_od#.b.g.o and I need to register the certificate for
every bug.
Xavier
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:02:28 -0400
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
>> That is exactly what Doug (cardoe) proposed, and he is working on the
>> docs for that.
>>
>
> Ah yes, it's been a long-winded thread. :)
>
>
> jer
>
I got a little busier th
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Albert W. Hopkins
wrote:
> There are kernel-dependent packages that (seem to) always look for
> configuration options, symbols, etc. in /usr/src/linux. When you use O=
> then those features do not exist in /usr/src/linux and thus those
> packages will fail. So I h
On Wednesday 04 July 2012 21:36:02 Albert W. Hopkins wrote:
> Might it be better if you could tell portage to look for kernel builds
> in another location than /usr/src/linux. Perhaps you can already and I'm
> not aware.
export KBUILD_OUTPUT=...
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digital
On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 02:49 +0300, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:56 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > Actually the directories do not need write permissions either. Take a
> > look at the O= option documented in /usr/src/linux/README.
>
> The KBUILD_OUTPUT / O= option seems like the
On 07/04/2012 07:58 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
>> The KBUILD_OUTPUT / O= option seems like the best solution to me
>> (especially so as I build three kernel images from a single sources
>> tree), and it works well, except that it sometimes doesn
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> The KBUILD_OUTPUT / O= option seems like the best solution to me
> (especially so as I build three kernel images from a single sources
> tree), and it works well, except that it sometimes doesn't with
> especially monstrous and hard to config
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:56 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> Actually the directories do not need write permissions either. Take a
> look at the O= option documented in /usr/src/linux/README.
The KBUILD_OUTPUT / O= option seems like the best solution to me
(especially so as I build three kernel images
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:46:47PM +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Recently, I have again bumped into the question whether one
> should compile the kernel as root. One of the things that puzzles
> me is why almost every HowTo, blog post and book recommends
> building as non-root -- yet b
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> All,
>
> bugs.gentoo.org will be down for 30 minutes sometime between 2100 and 2200
> UTC. We are migrating the database replication to newer and faster boxes.
> Apologies for the short notice. We'll let you know with a newer announcement
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 20:06:58 +0200
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 04 Jul 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
> > There's a very simple yet custom solution I'm using. Shortly saying:
> > checkout the kernel git to /usr/src/linux and chown to your user. As
> > far as it goes, it's superior to hav
On 07/02/2012 11:51 AM, Natanael Olaiz wrote:
It is LGPL, not GPL.
diff -aru liblo_original/liblo-0.26.ebuild liblo/liblo-0.26.ebuild
--- liblo_original/liblo-0.26.ebuild2011-09-12 20:38:28.0 +0200
+++ liblo/liblo-0.26.ebuild 2012-07-02 10:43:29.0 +0200
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Michael Weber wrote:
> I think running kernels from non-root checkouts is a pretty big
> security hole.
Suggest think again.
The Linux kernel should not and really must not be built as root.
This is neither supported nor recommended nor tested by upstream.
You may recall there was a kernel build
All,
bugs.gentoo.org will be down for 30 minutes sometime between 2100 and 2200
UTC. We are migrating the database replication to newer and faster boxes.
Apologies for the short notice. We'll let you know with a newer announcement
when it is finished.
the Gentoo Infrastructure team
signature.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/04/2012 08:56 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 02:20:36PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 07/04/2012 01:58 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> We could allow writes i
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 02:20:36PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/04/2012 01:58 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 19:46:47 +0200
> > Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> >
> >> Recently, I have again bumped into the question w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/04/2012 01:58 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 19:46:47 +0200
> Tobias Klausmann wrote:
>
>> Recently, I have again bumped into the question whether one
>> should compile the kernel as root. One of the things that puzzles
>> me is w
Hi!
On Wed, 04 Jul 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
> There's a very simple yet custom solution I'm using. Shortly saying:
> checkout the kernel git to /usr/src/linux and chown to your user. As
> far as it goes, it's superior to having kernel sources installed by
> ebuilds.
>
> I just have to remember
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 19:46:47 +0200
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Recently, I have again bumped into the question whether one
> should compile the kernel as root. One of the things that puzzles
> me is why almost every HowTo, blog post and book recommends
> building as non-root -- yet basically no dist
Hi!
Recently, I have again bumped into the question whether one
should compile the kernel as root. One of the things that puzzles
me is why almost every HowTo, blog post and book recommends
building as non-root -- yet basically no distribution /helps/ the
user with doing that.
I've discussed thi
On 07/01/2012 01:41 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> I guess, you are mixing cross-compile support in multilib profiles and
> cross-compile support with cross-toolchains, multilib-portage is for the
> first one, while crossdev is for the second one.
>
> My suggestion does not support e.g. compiling for
The change has been made.
Please remember to cvs up metadata/layout.conf and update portage (if
necessary) before committing.
Thanks
24 matches
Mail list logo
