Re: [gentoo-dev] Switching order of packages in virtual/pkgconfig

On 02/01/13 15:29, Luca Barbato wrote: last I checked prefix didn't have issues with the pkg-config bootstrap either. there is no circular deps either. check glib deps iirc some non-glibc platforms have few problems with it. not if you enable USE=internal-glib. i've added the USE flag on requ

Re: [gentoo-dev] collision-protect -> protect-owned ?

On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 00:25 -0500, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > On 01/03/2013 12:06 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:49:02 -0800 > > ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: > > > >> It came up again with , > >> and I think it's worth to

Re: [gentoo-dev] collision-protect -> protect-owned ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/03/2013 12:06 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:49:02 -0800 > ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: > >> It came up again with , >> and I think it's worth to think about a better fix. I stil

Re: [gentoo-dev] collision-protect -> protect-owned ?

On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:49:02 -0800 ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: > It came up again with , > and I think it's worth to think about a better fix. I still keep hitting > mysterious collisions with orphaned files from time to time. > > How about switch

Re: [gentoo-dev] collision-protect -> protect-owned ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/02/2013 10:49 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > It came up again with , > and I think it's worth to think about a better fix. I still keep hitting > mysterious collisions with orphaned files from tim

[gentoo-dev] collision-protect -> protect-owned ?

It came up again with , and I think it's worth to think about a better fix. I still keep hitting mysterious collisions with orphaned files from time to time. How about switching the developer profile from collision-protect to protect-owned, and proce

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

On Wednesday 02 January 2013 18:41:26 Pacho Ramos wrote: > and similar in some eclasses (like eutils, multilib) but not others i added it to the most popular eclasses and the ones i maintained. i left the rest up to other people to add it and make sure things still worked. -mike signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge --depclean vs missing IUSE in older ebuild.. what exactly is right?

On 01/02/2013 08:49 AM, Leho Kraav wrote: > Ok my conclusion is then that gdm-3.4.1.ebuild should be patched for > [systemd?-], considering it seems otherwise fully compatible with current > stable pambase. Opinions? Since gdm is using EAPI 4, sys-auth/pambase[consolekit?,systemd(-)?] seems doab

Re: [gentoo-dev] ship app-arch/pbzip2 instead of app-arch/bzip2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/02/2013 06:11 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El lun, 29-10-2012 a las 10:39 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió: >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina >> wrote: >>> I'm confident no one would >>> attempt to block my adding eselect-bzi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to end-of-life tree-clean old profiles/updates/ files

On 01/02/2013 02:46 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 08:59 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: >> >>> gentoo-x86/profiles/updates $ LANG=C ls -1 --sort=time >>> [long list omitted] >> >>> old entries are done in different context (compa

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools-multilib: wrapper eclass for multilib builds.

Alexis Ballier wrote: > - I have package foo and package bar, both depending on ffmpeg and > canditates for a multilib build. However, package foo does not link to > ffmpeg but simply spawns the 'ffmpeg' binary to process some files, > package bar links to libavcodec. You need ffmpeg[multilib] for

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

On 1/2/2013 6:54 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On 1/2/2013 6:41 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> What is the purpose of this stuff: >> if [[ ${___ECLASS_ONCE_EUTILS} != "recur -_+^+_- spank" ]] ; then >> ___ECLASS_ONCE_EUTILS="recur -_+^+_- spank" >> >> and similar in some eclasses (like eutils, multilib) but

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

On 1/2/2013 6:41 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > What is the purpose of this stuff: > if [[ ${___ECLASS_ONCE_EUTILS} != "recur -_+^+_- spank" ]] ; then > ___ECLASS_ONCE_EUTILS="recur -_+^+_- spank" > > and similar in some eclasses (like eutils, multilib) but not others > (like python-single-r1 that I was

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About unresolved bugs assigned to voip for ages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pacho Ramos schrieb: > Looks like finally you added yourself to metadata but with instructions > to bug-wranglers to CC you and assign to herd. I would like to confirm > this way of assigning things The difference is almost inconsequential in practi

[gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

What is the purpose of this stuff: if [[ ${___ECLASS_ONCE_EUTILS} != "recur -_+^+_- spank" ]] ; then ___ECLASS_ONCE_EUTILS="recur -_+^+_- spank" and similar in some eclasses (like eutils, multilib) but not others (like python-single-r1 that I was looking some days ago for learning how to use it)?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Make connman a global USE flag

El sáb, 21-07-2012 a las 13:51 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: > Several packages are using it with the same sense (support connman), > maybe we should move it from local to global USEs, what do you think? Will proceed then ;) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools-multilib: wrapper eclass for multilib builds.

El mar, 25-09-2012 a las 10:21 -0300, Alexis Ballier escribió: > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:49:13 +0200 > Thomas Sachau wrote: > > > It is not hard by itself to inherit an eclass. There is just the > > limitation, that occurs with an eclass, e.g.: > > > > -the one from mgorny only does it for autoto

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About unresolved bugs assigned to voip for ages

El jue, 11-10-2012 a las 08:13 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: > El mié, 10-10-2012 a las 20:11 -0400, Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) escribió: > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn > > wrote: > > > Pacho Ramos schrieb: > > >> I am noticing for a long time that bugs related

Re: [gentoo-dev] ship app-arch/pbzip2 instead of app-arch/bzip2

El lun, 29-10-2012 a las 10:39 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina > wrote: > > I'm confident no one would > > attempt to block my adding eselect-bzip2 to the tree (aside from my poor > > coding skills), > > ++ > > > but would anyone be inte

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-text/dbacl is up for grabs

El jue, 27-12-2012 a las 21:40 +0100, Amadeusz Żołnowski escribió: > Quoting Pacho Ramos (2012-12-27 12:20:11) > > Steev contacted me few hours ago to tell me he won't maintain dbacl > > anymore and, then, it's now up for grabs. > > > > Thanks for taking care of it > > If nobody is interested I c

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Panagiotis Christopoulos < pchr...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 22:52 Thu 20 Dec , Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Due araujo no longer taking care of them: > > dev-lang/gnu-smalltalk > > ... > > I'm taking this one. > > -- > Panagiotis Christopoulos ( pchrist ) > ( Gent

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 22:52 Thu 20 Dec , Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due araujo no longer taking care of them: > dev-lang/gnu-smalltalk > ... I'm taking this one. -- Panagiotis Christopoulos ( pchrist ) ( Gentoo Lisp Project ) pgpJt1_yi2GXq.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to end-of-life tree-clean old profiles/updates/ files

On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 08:59 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > > gentoo-x86/profiles/updates $ LANG=C ls -1 --sort=time > > [long list omitted] > > > old entries are done in different context (comparing to 2012): > > > - some packages change n

Re: [gentoo-dev] Local bindist descriptions

On Wednesday 02 January 2013 12:58:01 Cyprien Nicolas wrote: > Alexis Ballier wrote: > > It's probably too idealistic but I tend to consider that global flags > > should be enabled/disabled globally while local flags on a > > per-package basis. bindist is really something you want to enable > > glo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Local bindist descriptions

Alexis Ballier wrote: It's probably too idealistic but I tend to consider that global flags should be enabled/disabled globally while local flags on a per-package basis. bindist is really something you want to enable globally. On the other hand, "doc" is a global flag you don't want to enable g

Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge --depclean vs missing IUSE in older ebuild.. what exactly is right?

Ok my conclusion is then that gdm-3.4.1.ebuild should be patched for [systemd?-], considering it seems otherwise fully compatible with current stable pambase. Opinions? -- Sent from my Nokia N9On 31.12.12 17:34 Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:22:16 +0200 Leho Kraav wrote: > Just bum

Re: [gentoo-dev] Switching order of packages in virtual/pkgconfig

Rich Freeman schrieb: > Double-standards aside, I don't think the "original" implementation is > what matters, so much as what works best for our users (and ourselves) > in practice. I don't think the "original" matters either. But I wouldn't mind having libusb over libusbx, jpeg over libjpeg-turb

Re: [gentoo-dev] Switching order of packages in virtual/pkgconfig

On 1 January 2013 16:46, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 01/01/2013 22:29, Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon wrote: >> That sounds like a clear win. If it has survived the tinderboxing there >> likely isn't much to hold you back. As non-contentious topics sometimes >> end up with no replies at all... consider

Re: [gentoo-dev] Switching order of packages in virtual/pkgconfig

Rich Freeman wrote: > >> i'd say never. there is no benefit in switching. pkg-config is the > >> default implementation from freedesktop.org. > > > > That's one awful double standard. :\ > > Double-standards aside, I don't think the "original" implementation is > what matters, so much as what work

Re: [gentoo-dev] Switching order of packages in virtual/pkgconfig

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Samuli Suominen wrote: >> i'd say never. there is no benefit in switching. pkg-config is the >> default implementation from freedesktop.org. > > That's one awful double standard. :\ Double-standards aside, I don't think the "original" implemen

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/pypy:1.8

# Mike Gilbert (03 Jan 2013) # No longer maintained upstream. # Please upgrade to PyPy 1.9 or 2.0. # Removal in 30 days. dev-python/pypy:1.8 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Switching order of packages in virtual/pkgconfig

Samuli Suominen wrote: > i'd say never. there is no benefit in switching. pkg-config is the > default implementation from freedesktop.org. That's one awful double standard. :\ dev-libs/libusb is the default implementation from libusb.org, yet you are astonishingly eager to *avoid* that it is the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Switching order of packages in virtual/pkgconfig

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > i'd say never. there is no benefit in switching. pkg-config is the default > implementation from freedesktop.org. > pkg-config is now lighter and has less dependencies than before as the > switch from bundled glib1 to glib2 allowed dropping

Re: [gentoo-dev] Switching order of packages in virtual/pkgconfig

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 01/01/13 23:01, Jeff Horelick wrote: >> >> I would like to propose a switch of the order of DEPENDs in >> virtual/pkgconfig to make dev-util/pkgconf[pkg-config] the default >> choice for new installations. >> >> dev-util/pkgconf has less

Re: [gentoo-dev] Switching order of packages in virtual/pkgconfig

On 02/01/13 13:11, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 01/01/13 23:01, Jeff Horelick wrote: >> I would like to propose a switch of the order of DEPENDs in >> virtual/pkgconfig to make dev-util/pkgconf[pkg-config] the default >> choice for new installations. >> >> dev-util/pkgconf has less external dependen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Switching order of packages in virtual/pkgconfig

On 01/01/13 23:01, Jeff Horelick wrote: I would like to propose a switch of the order of DEPENDs in virtual/pkgconfig to make dev-util/pkgconf[pkg-config] the default choice for new installations. dev-util/pkgconf has less external dependencies, is lighter and is faster than dev-util/pkgconfig w

Re: [gentoo-dev] About using a CONFIGURATION (or SETUP) file under /usr/share/doc for configuration information

On 01/02/2013 03:48 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El mar, 01-01-2013 a las 16:01 -0800, Zac Medico escribió: >> On 01/01/2013 05:39 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >>> El mar, 01-01-2013 a las 14:32 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: pkg_postinst() { @@ -48,6 +56,8 @@ elog fi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping keywords, again

On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 12:36:36 +0100 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > You are supposed to[1] tell the arch team when you drop their keyword. *PDL-2.4.11 (16 Jun 2012) 16 Jun 2012; Sébastien Fabbro +PDL-2.4.11.ebuild, +files/PDL-2.4.11-fortran.patch, +files/PDL-2.4.11-shared-hdf.patch, metadata.xm

Re: [gentoo-dev] About using a CONFIGURATION (or SETUP) file under /usr/share/doc for configuration information

El mar, 01-01-2013 a las 16:01 -0800, Zac Medico escribió: > On 01/01/2013 05:39 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El mar, 01-01-2013 a las 14:32 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > >> pkg_postinst() { > >> @@ -48,6 +56,8 @@ > >>elog > >>fi > >> > >> + echo ${CONFIGURATION_INSTRUCTIONS} | f

[gentoo-dev] Dropping keywords, again

*octave-3.6.2-r1 (11 Jun 2012) 11 Jun 2012; Sébastien Fabbro +octave-3.6.2-r1.ebuild: Re-add hdf5, some octave packages might need it. Do in source configuring for preventing more bugs. Drop hppa (needs hdf5) You are supposed to[1] tell the arch team when you drop their keyword.