On 2021-04-22 21:23, Sam James wrote:
Such pkg_setups are best avoided if possible because they can be
confusing and we have other tools to handle it, so I’m glad you asked!
I’d provide a USE flag for this tool and mask it on non-multilib amd64
profiles (or mask everywhere and unmask on the
Ah, looks like attachment isn't attached, post my ebuild in plain text.
EAPI=7
inherit multilib toolchain-funcs
DESCRIPTION="Open source assembly language compiler"
HOMEPAGE="https://flatassembler.net;
SRC_URI="https://flatassembler.net/${P}.tgz;
LICENSE="MIT"
SLOT="0"
KEYWORDS="amd64 x86"
> On 22 Apr 2021, at 22:07, Nekun wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
Hi!
> Working on the fasm ebuild, have some questions:
>
> 1. fasm is written on itself and has two variants: self-contained binary for
> x86 and amd64 and linked with libc only for x86. Also, there are tools for
> working with the
Hi all,
Working on the fasm ebuild, have some questions:
1. fasm is written on itself and has two variants: self-contained binary
for x86 and amd64 and linked with libc only for x86. Also, there are
tools for working with the proprietary symbolic information format which
is libc-linked and
On 2021-03-27 23:40, Joshua Kinard wrote:
The MIPS machine has functioning local disk drives, and currently, it
boots fine by just pulling a kernel off my TFTP server and booting
from the local drive, no initramfs needed because I compiled
everything into it.
Out of curiosity, if your kernel
On 2021-03-29 10:06, James Le Cuirot wrote:
Have you seen CONFIG_CMDLINE? It lets you bake command line args into
the kernel image itself.
And since 5.6, there is also bootconfig:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/bootconfig.html
--
MS
OpenPGP_signature
Description:
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 15:45:11 CEST Theo Anderson wrote:
> Hi Agostino,
>
> After some discussion in IRC we've agreed to have the maintainer of
> the respective packages be assigned to the bug with guru@g.o be CC'd.
> Where no maintainer exists for a package guru@g.o remains as the
>
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 01:45:11PM +, Theo Anderson wrote:
> After some discussion in IRC we've agreed to have the maintainer of
> the respective packages be assigned to the bug with guru@g.o be CC'd.
> Where no maintainer exists for a package guru@g.o remains as the
> assignee. If you could
> On 22 Apr 2021, at 14:31, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
>
> Thanks for all feedback.
>
> Please discuss all points internally (branch, email, trackers and so on) and
> send me an email with all changes you would like to have.
As an aside, I do appreciate the CI and it’s turned out to be pretty
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:30:10 +0200
Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:22:00 CEST Theo Anderson wrote:
> > On the subject of many bugs, there are now almost 150 open bugs
> > assigned to g...@gentoo.org. With this has come quite an email
> > avalanche for which I think people
Thanks for all feedback.
Please discuss all points internally (branch, email, trackers and so on) and
send me an email with all changes you would like to have.
Agostino
> On 22 Apr 2021, at 11:50, Joakim Tjernlund
> wrote:
>
> I have noted that python, portage and gentoolkit appers to install many MB of
> what appers
> to be test code:
> python: /usr/lib/python*/test, /usr/lib/python*/ctypes/test,
> /usr/lib/python*/lib2to3/tests,
>
> On 22 Apr 2021, at 13:59, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> [snip]
> And, even if you don't see it like that, someday someone may want
> to go on a fixing spree using those trackers (may it be for ::guru
> or ::gentoo) but will keep seeing them mixed up together.
Yes, this is particularly apt for me.
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 14:59:00 CEST Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> And, even if you don't see it like that, someday someone may want
> to go on a fixing spree using those trackers (may it be for ::guru
> or ::gentoo) but will keep seeing them mixed up together.
You can do it as wel by doing a
On 22/04/2021 14:39, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:02:20 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
Well, I suppose scanning the dev branch would be preferable over
the master branch. In reality, they are usually only a few hours apart
but it might be useful to know of new breakage in dev
On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 14:39 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:02:20 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
> > Well, I suppose scanning the dev branch would be preferable over
> > the master branch. In reality, they are usually only a few hours apart
> > but it might be useful to
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 8:39 AM Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
>
> On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:02:20 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
> > Well, I suppose scanning the dev branch would be preferable over
> > the master branch. In reality, they are usually only a few hours apart
> > but it might be useful to
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 02:39:02PM +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:02:20 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
> > One more thing: might be a good idea to consider splitting some
> > of the 'big' trackers (like CFLAGS) between Gentoo and GURU. I think
> > solving these bugs in
On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 10:50 +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> I have noted that python, portage and gentoolkit appers to install many MB of
> what appers
> to be test code:
> python: /usr/lib/python*/test, /usr/lib/python*/ctypes/test,
> /usr/lib/python*/lib2to3/tests,
>
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:02:20 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
> Well, I suppose scanning the dev branch would be preferable over
> the master branch. In reality, they are usually only a few hours apart
> but it might be useful to know of new breakage in dev before it's merged
> to master.
>
> It
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:22:00 CEST Theo Anderson wrote:
> On the subject of many bugs, there are now almost 150 open bugs
> assigned to g...@gentoo.org. With this has come quite an email avalanche
> for which I think people must have set up mail filters by now. I
> imagine this means that
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:25:50 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 11:59 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with
> > overlays.
> >
> > Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to
>
I have noted that python, portage and gentoolkit appers to install many MB of
what appers
to be test code:
python: /usr/lib/python*/test, /usr/lib/python*/ctypes/test,
/usr/lib/python*/lib2to3/tests,
/usr/lib/python*/unittest, /usr/lib/python*/distutils/tests ...
portage/gentoolkit:
On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 11:59 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with overlays.
>
> Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to implement
> and test the CI
>
> Atm it has been configured to work with
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:59:21 +0200
Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with
> overlays.
>
> Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to
> implement and test the CI
Thank you for implementing this, it certainly
On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 11:59 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with overlays.
>
> Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to implement
> and test the CI
>
> Atm it has been configured to work with
Hello,
I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with overlays.
Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to implement
and test the CI
Atm it has been configured to work with master branch.
I don't know how much is useful scan the dev branch since a
Dne 22. 04. 21 v 8:37 Kaibo Ma napsal(a):
Is there a tracking issue for Java 11 on Bugzilla?
Kaibo Ma
this is it: https://bugs.gentoo.org/697014
fordfrog
# Michał Górny (2021-04-22)
# py3.7 backport with no revdeps left.
# Removal on 2021-05-22. Bug #784983.
dev-python/idna-ssl
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
Is there a tracking issue for Java 11 on Bugzilla?
Kaibo Ma
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 15:45, Miroslav Šulc wrote:
> hi guys,
>
> we're still far from unmasking java 11 on gentoo, but i hope it will
> happen, one day (or another...). currently there is one issue across the
> whole gentoo tree that
30 matches
Mail list logo
